Even funnier if it's just a back-end slider.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 02:49Started paying attention to the skin color of NPCs after seeing it brought up, only the randomly generated citizens seem heavily skewed towards black. Going to be funny if it's a bug, I want to see the patch notes.
Story goes the black race came from Lemuria. Deepest lore.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 2nd, 2023, 20:14Think New Atlantis purposely has NPCs skewed towards black. Akila/Neon seem to have less.
You can clone a female from a male by just removing the Y chromosome and duplicating the X chromosome.
amd was always trash joke company so intel cant be sued for monopoly. no lower life form than amd fan boy even kuks that marry single mothers.
Why use FSR/DLSS at native resolution (slider set to 100%)?aweigh wrote: β September 1st, 2023, 16:26EDIT: I accidentally had the resolution set to 50% of native XD
GhostCow wrote: β September 1st, 2023, 03:15rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 1st, 2023, 02:52Wait till @dead finds out that Barrett is gayDead wrote: β September 1st, 2023, 02:10
Can you post the one that doesn't look like a ******** gay ****** haircut?
In this specific case (Starfield) there's little reason, however in some other games the DLSS anti-aliasing is a lot better than the game's native TAA. It will be less blurry, it will anti-alias more effectively. This is why there's also a specific mode in some games called 'DLAA' which is just the DLSS 'AA' technique without any resolution reconstruction.Cohesion wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 17:03Why use FSR/DLSS at native resolution (slider set to 100%)?aweigh wrote: β September 1st, 2023, 16:26EDIT: I accidentally had the resolution set to 50% of native XD
I would love to live in 2010 again, what's the weather like?Red7 wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 11:10amd was always trash joke company so intel cant be sued for monopoly. no lower life form than amd fan boy even kuks that marry single mothers.
speaking of superior tech, i asked on loverslab if any1 tried starfield on win7 and they deleted my thread lol.
Reminder that you were defending skyboxes because "muh big space" - so you were just being a **** slurping fanboy.. Chad Todd actually delivered a space sim so your gushing was not even required. How embarrassing.This took 25 minutes at 65x game speed... that's 27 hours of realtime travel. Space in Starfield is big but actually realized in-engine! Should mean that space travel mods are a possibility.
No, you misunderstood what I was stating.
You never said that or if you did I didn't read it that way.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 20:07No, you misunderstood what I was stating.
I posted a video of me approaching a planet, it was just very slow. I was stating that it wasn't a skybox like you thought, but just incredibly big.
APOLOGIZE TO TODDShillitron wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 20:12You never said that or if you did I didn't read it that way.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 20:07No, you misunderstood what I was stating.
I posted a video of me approaching a planet, it was just very slow. I was stating that it wasn't a skybox like you thought, but just incredibly big.
I saw you defending invisible skybox because "It's so big what's the point of making seamless travel"
I really feel like there's gonna be a DLC or mod or something that drops to make seamless space travel more doable. Could be interesting.
I like it the way it is.Shillitron wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 20:12I really feel like there's gonna be a DLC or mod or something that drops to make seamless space travel more doable. Could be interesting.
Another.
It is dumb, because they had plenty of time to make Daggerfall in space.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 20:10people simply don't understand how big space is and want it presented to them like it's Star Trek, e.g:
maidenhaver wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 21:21It is dumb, because they had plenty of time to make Daggerfall in space.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 20:10people simply don't understand how big space is and want it presented to them like it's Star Trek, e.g:
Or they want games that aren't hindered by unnecessary realism.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 21:27Again, nerds cannot into space because scifi has broken their brains on the concept of scale.
"OH sure.. we COULD have meaningful space exploration.. but it takes 63 billion years to travel between those two planets at speed of light.. and space is EMPTY!.. and most planets are dead rocks with nothing to see.. we weren't lazy it's just realism! And life is rare in the universe, so there's no intelligent life except humans, and it's NASA PUNK realistic aesthetic so everything has to be shaped like monochrome shipping crates!"Dead wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 22:12Or they want games that aren't hindered by unnecessary realism.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 21:27Again, nerds cannot into space because scifi has broken their brains on the concept of scale.
As I said in IRC.. I think if the game was more Space Opera.. or More Warhammer, I'd enjoy it a lot more.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 22:20What you want is a fantasy game, not a sci-fi space game.
Go play skyrim.
Listen here, Todd: No Man's Sky + Daggerfall. That's all you needed to do. You failed, only this time you aren't the only walking sim dev. There are other open worlds to play.rusty_shackleford wrote: β September 3rd, 2023, 22:20What you want is a fantasy game, not a sci-fi space game.
Go play skyrim.
