TKVNC wrote: ↑
November 9th, 2024, 22:59
ArcaneLurker wrote: ↑
November 9th, 2024, 21:16
Bold of you to call this preachy slop a "joke." It's obvious it was supposed to be very meta and topical to what libtards like to parrot & complain about.
"We actually salvage from ruins, so we don't harm people UNLIKE SOME PEOPLE (the British)."
Success breeds jealousy. We're so fond of the handicap that we've ran our country into the ground for a laugh.
We could probably change it quite quickly if we got bored with our pets, though.
That said - the pathetic preaching of people who do not even bother to read History, let alone learn from it, is very vexing. Same as the ******* who say the Chagos Islands belong to Mauritius, even though they're nearly 2000 Miles away, because at one point in time, the entire region was packaged up by the French for easy administration.
Minds exist on a spectrum, some people are just *******. They don't care about that history because they're just using the complaint to get something. It might be something incredibly petty. You have to read less into what they're saying and more into the sub context, and their underlying basic urges. You can't reason with everyone as if they're driven by logic & truth.
On one side, you have people that are not capable of much autonomy, at the extreme, they do not even have an internal monologue.
They may misunderstand concepts, in not being able to relate to them, and sometimes will say things because of the reaction it invokes, or because they are subconsciously compelled to fit in with their ingroup/ identity. Think about how many Leftists go on about 'empathy', yet display a complete lack of cognitive empathy. They associate the word "empathy" with doing things for specific groups that are painted as underdogs. Like a little girl that sees how her parents give her things, when they "empathise" with her sobbing, so she sobs, again and again, whenever she wants something. They go along with the flow of those that have the most influence over them, and focus on themselves, their immediate urges or emotions, without being able to think for themselves to a strong enough degree.
On the other side, you have highly individualistic people with strong imaginations, that are capable of in-depth thought, and because of their self-awareness & critical thinking skills, are able to formulate original worldviews and alter them accordingly. Schizotypal are people that show symptoms that could be mistaken for Schizophrenia, but are actually being withdrawn, loners with 'mood disorders'-- and of course, why wouldn't they be if they're so unlike everyone around them? These people show a strong disregard for popular notions or peer pressure, but it's not because they do not realise it (like extreme autism or downsies), they can either override the urge to conform or they lack it.
That's not to say those in the former camp are worthless or not deserving of consideration.
They are very much like children, subconsciously repeating whatever was drummed into them since they were children, or what appears to them to be the popular notion of their ingroup & authorities or influencers.
Peers stacked upon peers, with the rare thinker caught in-between, unable to reason with those around them. It's incredibly hard to reach them without institutional/ political power & relevance, but I suppose, being someone dear to them, is more important than any evidence or reasoning you could give them-- the issue is, how loyal can they be?
The European people have incredible potential when their society is cultivated & maintained by the right people.
Only once the nervous system is restored, can the lymphatic & immune system be restored, so that the defective cells & the foreign bodies can be neutralised or expelled... basic biology.
Our story is a testament to how far absolutely anyone can fall.
