What a shame, but atleast a new Brante game is coming. first one was great.1998 wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 01:09
Also, would be very interesting to play an Arknian.
What a shame, but atleast a new Brante game is coming. first one was great.1998 wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 01:09
First game has a very interesting setting and well written, I enjoyed it a lot. Definitely not an RPG, closer to something like a digital gamebook.1998 wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 01:09
Interesting. I would've gone for a new setting, but we will see.1998 wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 01:09
I give you permission to make itJordy wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 21:56When are we going to have an official RPGHQ ranking list for RPGs rated by the members?
Any suggestions about the best way to go about it? Maybe take one post from each member about their top 3, 5 or 10 and assign points to each?Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 23:20I give you permission to make itJordy wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 21:56When are we going to have an official RPGHQ ranking list for RPGs rated by the members?
My vote's for Geneforge.Jordy wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 23:23Any suggestions about the best way to go about it? Maybe take one post from each member about their top 3, 5 or 10 and assign points to each?
I am glad to see that Niggerman made it into a dungeon crawler.1998 wrote: ↑ July 10th, 2024, 16:04I actually liked his first game, but **** not sure how long I can look at that green.
A poll that contains every single rpg ever made, with only 1 vote available to each user.Jordy wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 23:23Any suggestions about the best way to go about it? Maybe take one post from each member about their top 3, 5 or 10 and assign points to each?Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 23:20I give you permission to make itJordy wrote: ↑ July 26th, 2024, 21:56When are we going to have an official RPGHQ ranking list for RPGs rated by the members?
Missed this some how. It does look interesting...Finarfin wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 16:13New Game is called "The Life and Suffering of Prince Jerian"
Might be something for @Vergil lol
Vergil wrote: ↑ July 27th, 2024, 17:14Missed this some how. It does look interesting...Finarfin wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 16:13New Game is called "The Life and Suffering of Prince Jerian"
Might be something for @Vergil lol
Did you play the first one?
rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ July 27th, 2024, 17:16Did you play the first one?Vergil wrote: ↑ July 27th, 2024, 17:14Missed this some how. It does look interesting...Finarfin wrote: ↑ July 25th, 2024, 16:13New Game is called "The Life and Suffering of Prince Jerian"
Might be something for @Vergil lol
No the protag doesnt look cute.
1998 wrote: ↑ July 10th, 2024, 16:04From the dev of this one
Comes now...
I actually liked his first game, but **** not sure how long I can look at that green.
![]()
He's been showing mockups to get feedback on an updated look.

Acrux wrote: ↑ July 27th, 2024, 22:22He's been showing mockups to get feedback on an updated look.1998 wrote: ↑ July 10th, 2024, 16:04From the dev of this one
Comes now...
I actually liked his first game, but **** not sure how long I can look at that green.
![]()
![]()
Looks fantastic honestly, really high quality stuff if he could manage to make the whole game look that good.
Acrux wrote: ↑ July 27th, 2024, 22:22He's been showing mockups to get feedback on an updated look.1998 wrote: ↑ July 10th, 2024, 16:04From the dev of this one
Comes now...
I actually liked his first game, but **** not sure how long I can look at that green.
![]()
![]()
Tell him the one on the right is significantly better.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery wrote:A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Missing the spirit of the quote entirely, both of you, but I believe @Acrux was joking, you have no such excuse for your retardation.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 07:32Funny you should quote a fr*nchie. Regardless that quote doesn't apply to an artistic medium like video games, sure in the earliest days of the medium a few dots on the screen is the best you could hope for, but now that designers have a limitless canvass with which to paint masterpieces with, we should expect more than that.
Well from an artistic standpoint, the quote is nonsensical. What usually detracts from an artistic piece is the absence of something, there really is no such thing as a "bloated" painting unless the artist himself is poor and paints a confusing image. The quote really can only be applied to software and other non-artistic works. If we're arguing that a literal game about white dots on a black screen is acceptable, well, you might like to visit a modern art museum.Lhynn wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 14:24Missing the spirit of the quote entirely, both of you, but I believe @Acrux was joking, you have no such excuse for your retardation.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 07:32Funny you should quote a fr*nchie. Regardless that quote doesn't apply to an artistic medium like video games, sure in the earliest days of the medium a few dots on the screen is the best you could hope for, but now that designers have a limitless canvass with which to paint masterpieces with, we should expect more than that.
What the frenchie ****** meant with it is that perfection comes when only what works remains. This only means that any element that detracts from the experience must go.
You still get to use all them tools and elements designers have an abundance of, you have to know when its too much.
Its about being wise with what you use to paint your picture, not about miserly or minimalistic.
Pong would like a word with you.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 14:38Well from an artistic standpoint, the quote is nonsensical. What usually detracts from an artistic piece is the absence of something, there really is no such thing as a "bloated" painting unless the artist himself is poor and paints a confusing image. The quote really can only be applied to software and other non-artistic works. If we're arguing that a literal game about white dots on a black screen is acceptable, well, you might like to visit a modern art museum.Lhynn wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 14:24Missing the spirit of the quote entirely, both of you, but I believe @Acrux was joking, you have no such excuse for your retardation.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 07:32Funny you should quote a fr*nchie. Regardless that quote doesn't apply to an artistic medium like video games, sure in the earliest days of the medium a few dots on the screen is the best you could hope for, but now that designers have a limitless canvass with which to paint masterpieces with, we should expect more than that.
What the frenchie ****** meant with it is that perfection comes when only what works remains. This only means that any element that detracts from the experience must go.
You still get to use all them tools and elements designers have an abundance of, you have to know when its too much.
Its about being wise with what you use to paint your picture, not about miserly or minimalistic.
I'm not ********, you're just being a clown. But no you're right, let's not strive for higher levels of art and aesthetic beauty, and let's just stick with Pong because as this "enlightened" frenchman (lol) says, "Shits only good if you can't strip anything else off yo!". Which to any reasonable person (i.e not a jackass) means "do just enough to get by". I don't know what sort of mental gymnastics you have to do to read that as anything else, but okay. I'll humor you this one time.Acrux wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 15:35Pong would like a word with you.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 14:38Well from an artistic standpoint, the quote is nonsensical. What usually detracts from an artistic piece is the absence of something, there really is no such thing as a "bloated" painting unless the artist himself is poor and paints a confusing image. The quote really can only be applied to software and other non-artistic works. If we're arguing that a literal game about white dots on a black screen is acceptable, well, you might like to visit a modern art museum.Lhynn wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 14:24
Missing the spirit of the quote entirely, both of you, but I believe @Acrux was joking, you have no such excuse for your retardation.
What the frenchie ****** meant with it is that perfection comes when only what works remains. This only means that any element that detracts from the experience must go.
You still get to use all them tools and elements designers have an abundance of, you have to know when its too much.
Its about being wise with what you use to paint your picture, not about miserly or minimalistic.
In one sense, you are correct because he is talking about design rather than art.
But on the other hand, if your takeaway is what you think that's what I or Lynn or Msr. du French were saying then you truly are ********.
Pss...I actually work in design, so I know exactly what the quote means - and it's NOT what you seem to think it means. At all.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 16:53I'm not ********, you're just being a clown. But no you're right, let's not strive for higher levels of art and aesthetic beauty, and let's just stick with Pong because as this "enlightened" frenchman (lol) says, "Shits only good if you can't strip anything else off yo!". Which to any reasonable person (i.e not a jackass) means "do just enough to get by". I don't know what sort of mental gymnastics you have to do to read that as anything else, but okay. I'll humor you this one time.Acrux wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 15:35Pong would like a word with you.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 14:38
Well from an artistic standpoint, the quote is nonsensical. What usually detracts from an artistic piece is the absence of something, there really is no such thing as a "bloated" painting unless the artist himself is poor and paints a confusing image. The quote really can only be applied to software and other non-artistic works. If we're arguing that a literal game about white dots on a black screen is acceptable, well, you might like to visit a modern art museum.
In one sense, you are correct because he is talking about design rather than art.
But on the other hand, if your takeaway is what you think that's what I or Lynn or Msr. du French were saying then you truly are ********.
You're talking out of your unwiped ***, ******. Nobody has to work in design to know what that asinine quote supposedly, "truly means!". And if you work in design, I suppose I should hold you responsible for creating the globohomo art style. After all, you couldn't possibly remove anything else from such an artistic style, so it must be perfect!. It's just enough right, just enough to be whatever it needs to be. This random fr*nch ******** would be proud.Acrux wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 17:13Pss...I actually work in design, so I know exactly what the quote means - and it's NOT what you seem to think it means. At all.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 16:53I'm not ********, you're just being a clown. But no you're right, let's not strive for higher levels of art and aesthetic beauty, and let's just stick with Pong because as this "enlightened" frenchman (lol) says, "Shits only good if you can't strip anything else off yo!". Which to any reasonable person (i.e not a jackass) means "do just enough to get by". I don't know what sort of mental gymnastics you have to do to read that as anything else, but okay. I'll humor you this one time.Acrux wrote: ↑ July 28th, 2024, 15:35
Pong would like a word with you.
In one sense, you are correct because he is talking about design rather than art.
But on the other hand, if your takeaway is what you think that's what I or Lynn or Msr. du French were saying then you truly are ********.