Start video, skip ahead, foid talking about characters she voiced.
They ******* ruined it
Start video, skip ahead, foid talking about characters she voiced.
I had pretty much forgotten how this remake is still a thing until now, don't really think I'll play this even for free, like these ***** have even ****** up the combat.
That's not new. The behind the scenes had spanish foids talking about Gothicrusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ November 8th, 2025, 02:58Start video, skip ahead, foid talking about characters she voiced.
They ******* ruined it
A pretty cool site, thanks for sharing! They apparently want to make a game that implements the original vision of Gothic from the early design documents.OGchan wrote: ↑ January 31st, 2026, 14:56These lads seem to be working on a game inspired by Gothic called Phoenix.
Is it weird that we typically say "gold coins" and not "golden coins"?
Also has very little equipment altogether, rarely get new armorOyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 13th, 2026, 20:41Oblivion being made fun of for reducing the number of gear slots when Gothic II has significantly fewer is very funny (Skyrim has twice as many lol lmao)
4 pieces of armor, 170 unique worthless weaponsrusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 13th, 2026, 20:46Also has very little equipment altogether, rarely get new armorOyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 13th, 2026, 20:41Oblivion being made fun of for reducing the number of gear slots when Gothic II has significantly fewer is very funny (Skyrim has twice as many lol lmao)
Gothic games are RPGs because of design, very weak on the mechanics
I saw a mudcrab the other day.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 21st, 2026, 00:34These NPCs repeating the same lines constantly is starting to drive me a little batty!
You're very probably rightTweed wrote: ↑ February 21st, 2026, 00:36I saw a mudcrab the other day.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 21st, 2026, 00:34These NPCs repeating the same lines constantly is starting to drive me a little batty!
Same old mudcrab, every time.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 21st, 2026, 00:39You're very probably rightTweed wrote: ↑ February 21st, 2026, 00:36I saw a mudcrab the other day.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 21st, 2026, 00:34These NPCs repeating the same lines constantly is starting to drive me a little batty!
No, because the gold describes what's in the coins, not merely their physical appearance. A "golden" thing is just yellowish, and generally contains approximately 0% gold, whereas a "gold" thing contains at least some meaningful % of gold.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 10th, 2026, 04:45Is it weird that we typically say "gold coins" and not "golden coins"?
No. A "gold coin" is usually a coin made of gold, while a "golden coin" could be anything painted gold.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ February 10th, 2026, 04:45Is it weird that we typically say "gold coins" and not "golden coins"?
I think there was a mod needed which fixed a lot of the bugs. Maybe someone here remembers it I dont. Probably worth playing once, certainly better than most modern **** these days. Just a lot bigger in size than the first 2 games and less memorable.Killagain665 wrote: ↑ May 29th, 2026, 17:32Is Gothic 3 worth playtime? I keep getting mixed ideas, some say 3 was good some say it is dog doo doo not made by the same people. Want to play through the series in one complete swoop of 1-2-3. And won't play 3 if it is just a headache.
I thought it was pretty great. Just make sure you use the fan patch. Also turn the view distance up to insane levels. Makes the game more immersive.Killagain665 wrote: ↑ May 29th, 2026, 17:32Is Gothic 3 worth playtime? I keep getting mixed ideas, some say 3 was good some say it is dog doo doo not made by the same people. Want to play through the series in one complete swoop of 1-2-3. And won't play 3 if it is just a headache.
It is not as good as 1 or 2 and is a little badly made and has stupid parts, but it's fun enough.Killagain665 wrote: ↑ May 29th, 2026, 17:32Is Gothic 3 worth playtime? I keep getting mixed ideas, some say 3 was good some say it is dog doo doo not made by the same people. Want to play through the series in one complete swoop of 1-2-3. And won't play 3 if it is just a headache.
It's the roi parameter or whatever, I mention it in the post I link above. It only simulates the game in a tiny radius by default and yea it becomes super immersive if you crank it up.GhostCow wrote: ↑ May 30th, 2026, 21:25I thought it was pretty great. Just make sure you use the fan patch. Also turn the view distance up to insane levels. Makes the game more immersive.Killagain665 wrote: ↑ May 29th, 2026, 17:32Is Gothic 3 worth playtime? I keep getting mixed ideas, some say 3 was good some say it is dog doo doo not made by the same people. Want to play through the series in one complete swoop of 1-2-3. And won't play 3 if it is just a headache.
It's one of the worst ******* ****, don't ever listen to anyone who said the otherwise as they all have a **** taste.Killagain665 wrote: ↑ May 29th, 2026, 17:32Is Gothic 3 worth playtime? I keep getting mixed ideas, some say 3 was good some say it is dog doo doo not made by the same people. Want to play through the series in one complete swoop of 1-2-3. And won't play 3 if it is just a headache.
Soooo, kind of like most bethesda games. kinda jank and bland up front, but 10 mods and 2 unofficial patches later it starts getting good.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 31st, 2026, 00:22If you don't want to bother with modding Gothic 3 yourself I packaged the version I prefer into a single download fyi
viewtopic.php?p=190570-gothic-3#p190570
I had a lot of fun with it and imo underrated. Definitely bad without mods but the community did a ton of work.
No. It's not "good". It's just "okay".Killagain665 wrote: ↑ May 31st, 2026, 00:38Soooo, kind of like most bethesda games. kinda jank and bland up front, but 10 mods and 2 unofficial patches later it starts getting good.