We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/

Dare you enter my magical realm?

For discussing role-playing video games, you know, the ones with combat.
Ignore Topic
User avatar
Atlantico
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2098
Joined: Feb 23, '23

Geolocation

Dare you enter my magical realm?

Post by Atlantico »

The problem with role playing is that it attracts people who put an entirely different meaning and idea into the term "role-playing".

Hence ******.
Last edited by rusty_shackleford on April 7th, 2025, 04:46, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lancaster
Posts: 481
Joined: Jan 31, '24

Geolocation

Post by Lancaster »

Atlantico wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 13:43
The problem with role playing is that it attracts people who put an entirely different meaning and idea into the term "role-playing".

Hence ******.
Then they claim that the faggotry was there all along, and we were just too ignorant to see it back then. Just like there are conveniently now more prominent black figures portrayed in European history....and Japanese lol.
Last edited by Lancaster on April 6th, 2025, 18:53, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vergil
Posts: 15670
Joined: Sep 6, '23

Geolocation

Post by Vergil »

DnD has an entire race based on femdom fetishes
I'm just stating the facts.
Question is are you going to gargle the truth or swallow?
User avatar
fkirenicus
Posts: 783
Joined: Feb 29, '24

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by fkirenicus »

Lancaster wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 18:43
Then they claim that the faggotry was there all along, and we were just too ignorant to see it back then. Just like there are conveniently now more prominent black figures portrayed in European history....and Japanese lol.
Yep. As we all know, Anne Boleyn was black. :groan:
User avatar
Lancaster
Posts: 481
Joined: Jan 31, '24

Geolocation

Post by Lancaster »

fkirenicus wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 19:08
Lancaster wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 18:43
Then they claim that the faggotry was there all along, and we were just too ignorant to see it back then. Just like there are conveniently now more prominent black figures portrayed in European history....and Japanese lol.
Yep. As we all know, Anne Boleyn was black. :groan:
I had to look that one up lol, I had no idea they went as far to portray royalty as being black.
User avatar
Roguey
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 3184
Joined: Feb 4, '23

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by Roguey »

Ed Greenwood always intended for the Forgotten Realms to be gay as hell, it was the risk-averse moneymen who kept it out of the role-playing games. https://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/dnd ... ality.html
In FR as Ed Greenwood envisioned it, polygamy and "free love" are very commonplace, and homosexual relationships are common without being controversial at all. Mind you, Greenwood in his own notes on the Realms was very explicit about the sexuality in the Realms (I believe you can find his extensive notes on the "Candlekeep" website, at least you used to be able to), and his notes are far more "mature" rated than any printed version of the Realms.

The earlier, TSR editions of the FR published material whitewashed this almost completely, because of the particular "morality code" that TSR had developed under Lorraine William's reign of terror.

However, the new WoTC FR is more "PG" in this subject matter, detailing openly several major NPCs who are homosexual, bisexual or polyamourous. Its done in a fairly low-keep way, just noting it as another little detail of the rich descriptiveness of the Realms as a setting.
User avatar
Atlantico
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2098
Joined: Feb 23, '23

Geolocation

Post by Atlantico »

Roguey wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 19:33
Ed Greenwood always intended for the Forgotten Realms to be gay as hell, it was the risk-averse moneymen who kept it out of the role-playing games. https://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/dnd ... ality.html
In FR as Ed Greenwood envisioned it, polygamy and "free love" are very commonplace, and homosexual relationships are common without being controversial at all. Mind you, Greenwood in his own notes on the Realms was very explicit about the sexuality in the Realms (I believe you can find his extensive notes on the "Candlekeep" website, at least you used to be able to), and his notes are far more "mature" rated than any printed version of the Realms.

The earlier, TSR editions of the FR published material whitewashed this almost completely, because of the particular "morality code" that TSR had developed under Lorraine William's reign of terror.

However, the new WoTC FR is more "PG" in this subject matter, detailing openly several major NPCs who are homosexual, bisexual or polyamourous. Its done in a fairly low-keep way, just noting it as another little detail of the rich descriptiveness of the Realms as a setting.
Truth. In my adolescence I read many TSR fantasy novels, and one of them was Spellfire by Greenwood. Hypercringe stuff.
User avatar
Lancaster
Posts: 481
Joined: Jan 31, '24

Geolocation

Post by Lancaster »

Roguey wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 19:33
Ed Greenwood always intended for the Forgotten Realms to be gay as hell, it was the risk-averse moneymen who kept it out of the role-playing games. https://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/dnd ... ality.html
In FR as Ed Greenwood envisioned it, polygamy and "free love" are very commonplace, and homosexual relationships are common without being controversial at all. Mind you, Greenwood in his own notes on the Realms was very explicit about the sexuality in the Realms (I believe you can find his extensive notes on the "Candlekeep" website, at least you used to be able to), and his notes are far more "mature" rated than any printed version of the Realms.

The earlier, TSR editions of the FR published material whitewashed this almost completely, because of the particular "morality code" that TSR had developed under Lorraine William's reign of terror.

However, the new WoTC FR is more "PG" in this subject matter, detailing openly several major NPCs who are homosexual, bisexual or polyamourous. Its done in a fairly low-keep way, just noting it as another little detail of the rich descriptiveness of the Realms as a setting.
I looked into this a bit. Attractive bisexual women were only the ones mentioned pre-social contagion. I can really only find normalized homosexuality during the start of the social contagion (man-buns, metrosexuals, and emo ****) when everyone was getting on the gay agenda bandwagon.
User avatar
Stack of Turtles
Posts: 7378
Joined: May 7, '24
Location: Soon-to-be Iran

Geolocation

Post by Stack of Turtles »

Lancaster wrote: ↑ April 7th, 2025, 04:38
Roguey wrote: ↑ April 6th, 2025, 19:33
Ed Greenwood always intended for the Forgotten Realms to be gay as hell, it was the risk-averse moneymen who kept it out of the role-playing games. https://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/dnd ... ality.html
In FR as Ed Greenwood envisioned it, polygamy and "free love" are very commonplace, and homosexual relationships are common without being controversial at all. Mind you, Greenwood in his own notes on the Realms was very explicit about the sexuality in the Realms (I believe you can find his extensive notes on the "Candlekeep" website, at least you used to be able to), and his notes are far more "mature" rated than any printed version of the Realms.

The earlier, TSR editions of the FR published material whitewashed this almost completely, because of the particular "morality code" that TSR had developed under Lorraine William's reign of terror.

However, the new WoTC FR is more "PG" in this subject matter, detailing openly several major NPCs who are homosexual, bisexual or polyamourous. Its done in a fairly low-keep way, just noting it as another little detail of the rich descriptiveness of the Realms as a setting.
I looked into this a bit. Attractive bisexual women were only the ones mentioned pre-social contagion. I can really only find normalized homosexuality during the start of the social contagion (man-buns, metrosexuals, and emo ****) when everyone was getting on the gay agenda bandwagon.
Yes, but that's because WotC limited what was allowed to be published. Hippies like Greenwood were basically keeping the candle burning under the bushel for what you think was the "start of the social contagion".
VAE VICTIS
User avatar
rusty_shackleford
Site Admin
Posts: 46432
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Watermelon

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by rusty_shackleford »

TSR's FR was never Greenwood's FR. It doesn't matter what he claimed or his intentions, it wasn't his.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
User avatar
Atlantico
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2098
Joined: Feb 23, '23

Geolocation

Post by Atlantico »

It's like this. When people are introduced to roleplaying during adolescence, their reaction is either:

"wow I've always wanted to play a knight fighting evil orcs"

or

"I want to play a woman and have sex with elves"

These are not the same kinds of people and they're not talking about the same thing.
User avatar
Roguey
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 3184
Joined: Feb 4, '23

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by Roguey »

Lancaster wrote: ↑ April 7th, 2025, 04:38
I looked into this a bit. Attractive bisexual women were only the ones mentioned pre-social contagion. I can really only find normalized homosexuality during the start of the social contagion (man-buns, metrosexuals, and emo ****) when everyone was getting on the gay agenda bandwagon.
Yeah, straight guys find male homosexuality disgusting and either have to mindbreak themselves to depict it or actively hire fujoshi or gay men to write it for them.
User avatar
Tangerine
Posts: 3797
Joined: Dec 1, '24

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by Tangerine »

It's be easier to just not.
User avatar
Roguey
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 3184
Joined: Feb 4, '23

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by Roguey »

Tangerine wrote: ↑ April 7th, 2025, 12:35
It's be easier to just not.
Not if you're a liberal who's committed to being inclusive. I recall reading an interview with a liberal author on the topic of "forced diversity" and his response was something along the lines of "Yes, of course it's forced. You have to force it and keep forcing it until it becomes natural."
User avatar
Demonic Fate
Posts: 694
Joined: Feb 19, '25

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by Demonic Fate »

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 7th, 2025, 04:47
TSR's FR was never Greenwood's FR. It doesn't matter what he claimed or his intentions, it wasn't his.
Such a shame we never got to play as one of the Heralds of Faerun, who go around yelling at lords and kings for using the wrong shade of grey when painting a boar's head on their banner, and this somehow makes them an extremely respected and feared society instead of a bunch of autistic dweebs.

(In fairness, I think Greenwood was being a bit tongue-in-cheek by putting his heraldry club in the setting. He's never taken the FR entirely seriously, which was probably for the best.)
User avatar
Acrux
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 6747
Joined: Feb 8, '23

Geolocation

Adventurer's Guild

Post by Acrux »

Demonic Fate wrote: ↑ April 7th, 2025, 15:12
He's never taken the FR entirely seriously, which was probably for the best.)
Creators not taking their works seriously has given us 80% of the awful slop we see now.
Like my posts? Consider a donation: PayPal
Hate my posts? Consider a donation: PayPal
Indifferent to my posts? Consider a donation: PayPal