"Sweet Baby Inc detected" and other noticings involving the Marxist takeover of gaming

[Tweed]

Maybe they want people to go outside and play?

[1998]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

You vastly overestimate them if you think they have anything like a game or business plan. Just look at them, they are the most one dimensional group of people imaginable.

[Faceless_Sentinel]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

Destroy the industry in a sense that there will be no games without gender ideology, like when filmmakers burned old films so people had nothing to watch except new that they made.

[UltraFan123]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

Destroy the industry in a sense that there will be no games without gender ideology, like when filmmakers burned old films so people had nothing to watch except new that they made.

Hence why I label them as delusional narcissists since they can destroy their own propaganda vehicles if they want and accelerate the gaming crash, because the actual game industry itself will be sustained by indie developers who make games that people actually want to play.

And yes, I'm aware that there's a considerable amount of woke indies as well, but those will be filtered out by the free market.

[Manny V]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

Is it a he or a she? I'm not certain.

****** lose all naming privileges, they abandoned their biological sex in a vain attempt to masquerade as the opposite. they remain in a disturbing state of limbo in between, so, IMO, they should simply be referred to as 'it'

[Faceless_Sentinel]

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

Destroy the industry in a sense that there will be no games without gender ideology, like when filmmakers burned old films so people had nothing to watch except new that they made.

Hence why I label them as delusional narcissists since they can destroy their own propaganda vehicles if they want and accelerate the gaming crash, because the actual game industry itself will be sustained by indie developers who make games that people actually want to play.

And yes, I'm aware that there's a considerable amount of woke indies as well, but those will be filtered out by the free market.

Their target is AAA and AA games that being consumed by mass consumer, normie if you want, mass consumer rarely buy indie games, they don't have those AAA and AA budgets and marketing.

[Marcus]

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

I can think of at least (((one group))) that has always benefited from the misery of others.

[cyberfriend]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

Is it a he or a she? I'm not certain.

*it*

[Xenich]

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

I can think of at least (((one group))) that has always benefited from the misery of others.

Yep, my bet is they will actually profit on these companies collapsing while the normie investors lose their ***.

[ArcaneLurker]

They're the type to promote one thing with a group, in order to sabotage them, whilst creating competitors that do the opposite. Then when they have total monopoly, as a group, they can do what they like.

[Cheeseknife]

Then when they have total monopoly, as a group, they can do what they like.

That's already the case and has been for a while now. They worked their way into the system about 10 or so years ago and what we're seeing right now in the industry are the fruits of their labor. My guess is that it won't be until 2035 that we start to see another change and far less of a push for all this Left Wing propaganda. I'm hoping Larian Studio, among others, will show the industry the way of things.

[ArcaneLurker]

Then when they have total monopoly, as a group, they can do what they like.

That's already the case and has been for a while now. They worked their way into the system about 10 or so years ago and what we're seeing right now in the industry are the fruits of their labor. My guess is that it won't be until 2035 that we start to see another change and far less of a push for all this Left Wing propaganda. I'm hoping Larian Studio, among others, will show the industry the way of things.

That's what my comment already implies, right?

It will be even harder to undo by 2035

[Unhelpful Contrarian]

I'm hoping Larian Studio, among others, will show the industry the way of things.

[Cheeseknife]

It will be even harder to undo by 2035

Nah, it's already being undone. I don't think we'll ever "go back" so to speak, but what we will have will be completely different.

[J1M]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????

Forgot the "claim oppression" and "demand socialism" steps.

[ArcaneLurker]

It will be even harder to undo by 2035

Nah, it's already being undone. I don't think we'll ever "go back" so to speak, but what we will have will be completely different.

It requires more than a superficial concession, which could be momentary in the grand scheme of things.

[Cheeseknife]

It will be even harder to undo by 2035

Nah, it's already being undone. I don't think we'll ever "go back" so to speak, but what we will have will be completely different.

It requires more than a superficial concession, which could be momentary in the grand scheme of things.

Momentary implying things will just default? But to default is to die. To die means the things that last or have lasting value will prevail. That's what I'm getting at. You cannot sustain stupidity.

[ArcaneLurker]

Nah, it's already being undone. I don't think we'll ever "go back" so to speak, but what we will have will be completely different.

It requires more than a superficial concession, which could be momentary in the grand scheme of things.

Momentary implying things will just default? But to default is to die. To die means the things that last or have lasting value will prevail. That's what I'm getting at. You cannot sustain stupidity.

The source of the rot has to be cauterised in it's entirety.

Because it's not as explicit as an aristocratic clique or dynasty, people struggle to see those in power as a tangible group, but they exist and they're the ones dragging multiple nations towards the same end goal with the vast influence & resources at their disposal. There's no chance of entertainment returning to the hands of the people, without everything else being fixed too.

[Cheeseknife]

It requires more than a superficial concession, which could be momentary in the grand scheme of things.

Momentary implying things will just default? But to default is to die. To die means the things that last or have lasting value will prevail. That's what I'm getting at. You cannot sustain stupidity.

The source of the rot has to be cauterised in it's entirety.

Because it's not as explicit as an aristocratic clique or dynasty, people struggle to see those in power as a tangible group, but they exist and they're the ones dragging multiple nations towards the same end goal with the vast influence & resources at their disposal. There's no chance of entertainment returning to the hands of the people, without everything else being fixed too.

Entertainment as a mainstream facet? Yes. However, as we become more and more tribal, so will our entertainment. Things will be sequestered and set apart. Those parts of entertainment which contain worthwhile cultural values versus those that seek death will prevail and outlast us and (hopefully) our children. I think that's the future.

I'd encourage everyone to get into gear and create your own projects, your own stories, games, media, etc. Do this, set apart from the mainstream. And, as the mainstream crumbles, find some way of making your own work survive--be it your family, your friends, or community who partakes in it.

[UltraFan123]

I'd encourage everyone to get into gear and create your own projects, your own stories, games, media, etc. Do this, set apart from the mainstream. And, as the mainstream crumbles, find some way of making your own work survive--be it your family, your friends, or community who partakes in it.

I'm currently learning how to make digital art precisely because of this.

And yeah, I know AI art is advancing at light-speed but I still would never trust a machine to make stuff precisely the way I want it to down to the last little detail.

[ArcaneLurker]

Momentary implying things will just default? But to default is to die. To die means the things that last or have lasting value will prevail. That's what I'm getting at. You cannot sustain stupidity.

The source of the rot has to be cauterised in it's entirety.

Because it's not as explicit as an aristocratic clique or dynasty, people struggle to see those in power as a tangible group, but they exist and they're the ones dragging multiple nations towards the same end goal with the vast influence & resources at their disposal. There's no chance of entertainment returning to the hands of the people, without everything else being fixed too.

Entertainment as a mainstream facet? Yes. However, as we become more and more tribal, so will our entertainment. Things will be sequestered and set apart. Those parts of entertainment which contain worthwhile cultural values versus those that seek death will prevail and outlast us and (hopefully) our children. I think that's the future.

I'd encourage everyone to get into gear and create your own projects, your own stories, games, media, etc. Do this, set apart from the mainstream. And, as the mainstream crumbles, find some way of making your own work survive--be it your family, your friends, or community who partakes in it.

In some countries this is possible, and of course, you can do what you want on your own, or with a few trusted friends, but they have implemented means to prevent White people from segregating, in certain countries, it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex (this happens in industries where there is obviously no need for any intentional plot for it to happen, so the heat on industries that influence large groups of people is going to be even worse). There are discrimination/ hate speech laws on what you can espouse, produce or fund. Thus it requires a complete collapse of the political system to get to that point, and at that point, people aren't going to have any money to waste on new entertainment.

In UK, things are so bad that the supposed "Far Right" party doesn't actually recognise English people's right to deny immigration into UK on the basis of ancestry or race, or preventing the genocidal plot for genotypic extinction, it's just a meritocratic/ civnat thing that wants to reduce illegal immigration, and promote cultural cohesiveness with the growing 'diversity' by demanding more assimilation from immigrants...

[UltraFan123]

it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex

So you simply can't say that this particular woman or colored guy wasn't hired because she/he doesn't has the skills and/or experience you are looking for? That is always what I hear every time I try to apply for a new job that isn't a ****** call center.

[Unhelpful Contrarian]

it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex

So you simply can't say that this particular woman or colored guy wasn't hired because she/he doesn't has the skills and/or experience you are looking for? That is always what I hear every time I try to apply for a new job that isn't a ****** call center.

You can however but you may loose certain financial benefits loans, grants and other insensitives as a corporation. When your small business you can away with being more selective in hiring practices but once you reach a certain size it becomes harder to following through hiring people who are non DEI applicants.

[ArcaneLurker]

it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex

So you simply can't say that this particular woman or colored guy wasn't hired because she/he doesn't has the skills and/or experience you are looking for? That is always what I hear every time I try to apply for a new job that isn't a ****** call center.

You ought to know how Libtards are. Merit doesn't matter as much as appeasing ******* and foids. Nobody under 6ft should be on the police force yet that requirement was canned because of how rare it is for a woman to be 6ft or more.
So sometimes people hire someone they know isn't as well suited for the job, just to appease those breathing down their necks, demanding demographic quotas to be fulfilled.

[Stack of Turtles]

it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex

So you simply can't say that this particular woman or colored guy wasn't hired because she/he doesn't has the skills and/or experience you are looking for? That is always what I hear every time I try to apply for a new job that isn't a ****** call center.

You can't, because of disparate impact theory - if you hire a white man over a colored and a court decides they were equally qualified, or if your hiring practices overall do not result in a disproportionate number of coloreds being hired, it will be presumed that the only reason this could happen is racism. Similarly for women and sexism.

[Xenich]

it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex

So you simply can't say that this particular woman or colored guy wasn't hired because she/he doesn't has the skills and/or experience you are looking for? That is always what I hear every time I try to apply for a new job that isn't a ****** call center.

You can't, because of disparate impact theory - if you hire a white man over a colored and a court decides they were equally qualified, or if your hiring practices overall do not result in a disproportionate number of coloreds being hired, it will be presumed that the only reason this could happen is racism. Similarly for women and sexism.

Which is why the Civil Rights Act needs to be removed. It is a direct violation of the Constitution anyway, but don't tell all those "murica" types as they will go ape **** as they are the most idiotic people when it comes to the Constitution (at least the commies know they are violating it). They don't know their head from their *** about it and are often the first to support pissing on it unfortunately.

[Norfleet]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

WTF, I'm in favor of Sweet Baby now? The games industry NEEDS burning to the ground. We haven't had a proper forest fire since '83, and the industry is more than 40 years overdue for a proper burnin'.

[UltraFan123]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

WTF, I'm in favor of Sweet Baby now? The games industry NEEDS burning to the ground. We haven't had a proper forest fire since '83, and the industry is more than 40 years overdue for a proper burnin'.

I think it's important to keep in mind that these freaks don't want to burn everything down to encourage new growth, they want to burn it down in a way that ensures that nothing ever grows back again.

They are starting to realize that they can't have an absolute monopoly of what games are made nor which games are guaranteed to be successful, so they want to destroy the industry because they have no control over.

[Norfleet]

I think it's important to keep in mind that these freaks don't want to burn everything down to encourage new growth, they want to burn it down in a way that ensures that nothing ever grows back again.

Why everything burns is secondary to the fact that everything burns. When everything is burning, it doesn't matter why it was burning, just that this is fine.

[rusty_shackleford]

it's all based on Civil Rights but it means that you'll be investigated for intentionally excluding others on the basis of race or sex

So you simply can't say that this particular woman or colored guy wasn't hired because she/he doesn't has the skills and/or experience you are looking for? That is always what I hear every time I try to apply for a new job that isn't a ****** call center.

Them sucking is your(the employer's) fault, it's called disparate impact. And yes, it's an actual thing most people seem completely oblivious of. Probably because even by clown world standards it's still rather insane.

Say you're an employer and you have a group of 30 applicants for a software job. All the whites and asians passed whatever tests you had plus the interview. 40% of women did, and 20% of blacks did.
Could you just include the 40% female and 20% blacks into your potential hiring pool?




No.


So, what do you do? You keep throwing out applicant pools until you get one that's just white and asian men. Of course, you have to be careful doing that because of Ricci v. DeStefano which is exactly about this: white firefighters had their promotion denied because not enough blacks were eligible for promotion — note that if 0 blacks were in the pool of potential candidates, they would have been fine, the whites were being punished just for the blacks existing.
They had to go all the way to the SCOTUS for someone to point out how ******* ridiculous that is.