"Sweet Baby Inc detected" and other noticings involving the Marxist takeover of gaming

[UltraFan123]

And when the execs found out it was ONLY their search doing it, they sent someone to look into it and fixed it post-haste.

At least the ones in charge of Google are aware that they aren't the only search engine in existence and that they have genuine competition, and I legit hope that whatever freak was responsible for that stunt was given the boot.

[Zothique]

Apparently Google does things:

No clue why but I like this lady. (I swear to god Stack of Turtles if you write "lady" again..."
Does play a lot of games (Though I am not a fan of her even playing the woke games, but I guess it's to make sure that she can actually judge them without people crying around about how she didn't play any of them)

The grift is real. She's a ******* dangerhair that probably sees where this **** is going and wants to make sure she's the prime fronthole still left standing after gaem industry wokies suicide in another year or so.

Never trust foids.

[Magick]

Apparently Google does things:

No clue why but I like this lady. (I swear to god Stack of Turtles if you write "lady" again..."
Does play a lot of games (Though I am not a fan of her even playing the woke games, but I guess it's to make sure that she can actually judge them without people crying around about how she didn't play any of them)

The grift is real. She's a ******* dangerhair that probably sees where this **** is going and wants to make sure she's the prime fronthole still left standing after gaem industry wokies suicide in another year or so.

Never trust foids.

Dangerhair, yes. (Though I saw many silly girls at school completely dying it, who weren't Karens / into politics).
Looking at the oldest vids, she seemed to have started off just doing vids about Magic The Gathering cards, 6y ago, then recording some gameplay. Then 5y ago she started making vids on gaming censorship (disappointment with diabolo) and against predatory / anti-consumer industry practices.

Doesn't look like a recent jump-in "I'm on your side boisss, teehee", at least. It is correct to act with some suspicion, but do consider there will be a few who are genuine.
Not seen any warning signs so far (besides the hair).

I'm not a follower of her vids, nor subscribed btw, so this is just based on some objective observation. Those who have seen stuff from her from way back may know better.

[Zothique]

No clue why but I like this lady. (I swear to god Stack of Turtles if you write "lady" again..."
Does play a lot of games (Though I am not a fan of her even playing the woke games, but I guess it's to make sure that she can actually judge them without people crying around about how she didn't play any of them)

The grift is real. She's a ******* dangerhair that probably sees where this **** is going and wants to make sure she's the prime fronthole still left standing after gaem industry wokies suicide in another year or so.

Never trust foids.

Dangerhair, yes. (Though I saw many silly girls at school completely dying it, who weren't Karens / into politics).
Looking at the oldest vids, she seemed to have started off just doing vids about Magic The Gathering cards, 6y ago, then recording some gameplay. Then 5y ago she started making vids on gaming censorship (disappointment with diabolo) and against predatory / anti-consumer industry practices.

Doesn't look like a recent jump-in "I'm on your side boisss, teehee", at least. It is correct to act with some suspicion, but do consider there will be a few who are genuine.
Not seen any warning signs so far (besides the hair).

I'll have some trust in your assessment. That said, women are trash and need to stay the **** out of gaming.

In fact, they should stay out of everything, including the kitchen. There's not a single thing they can not and will not **** up.

[Rand]

So, you don't HAVE to use the bloated black ***** as your commander, but they put her front and center in everything.
Who is this intended to appeal to?

[rusty_shackleford]

So, you don't HAVE to use the bloated black ***** as your commander, but they put her front and center in everything.
Who is this intended to appeal to?

Result of replacing an attractive white female protagonist with a fat negress.
This is why I don't buy games that are seemingly 'unwoke' anymore unless I know the developer is not a libtard. They use things like the former game to fund their fetish games.

[Hauberk]

Looks like it would fit on a box of rice or a bottle of soy sauce.

[UltraFan123]

Looks like it would fit on a box of rice or a bottle of soy sauce.

Yeah that is a face you put on some food stuff, not in a videogame. lol

[Rand]

Is the problem this Robotality?

[Rand]

Man, I am tempted to get the second game just to mod the black ***** out to annoy the devs.

[AmericanMonarchist]

Man, I am tempted to get the second game just to mod the black ***** out to annoy the devs.

Pay the people who hate you money. That will show them good!

[Breathe]

Man, I am tempted to get the second game just to mod the black ***** out to annoy the devs.

Is it available to pirate? And could you mod the pirated game files and then upload the mod? I don't know enough to know if this is viable or not. If yes, that would be funny.

[Rand]

Man, I am tempted to get the second game just to mod the black ***** out to annoy the devs.

Pay the people who hate you money. That will show them good!

Note I did NOT say buy.
Like I would give money to Chucklefish under any circumstances.

Is it available to pirate? And could you mod the pirated game files and then upload the mod? I don't know enough to know if this is viable or not. If yes, that would be funny.

Here's a user that understands.
And as to the question, In every case I can think of, absolutely yes.
Very funny indeed.
Pirate the DEI game to un-DEI the pirate.

[Rand]

[UltraFan123]

I believe this is good, since publishers actively being "concerned about review bombing" before the thing is even out is like the most blatant form of self-report.

That way we know beforehand about not spending money on their slop. lol

[CSM-101]

If you were going to get GTA6 after that first trailer, you played yourself.

[Rand]

Ubisoft's "apology" (somehow arrogant plea for mercy) translated into normal person english.

► Show Spoiler

► Show Spoiler

► Show Spoiler

► Show Spoiler

[Magick]

Ubisoft's "apology" (somehow arrogant plea for mercy) translated into normal person english.

► Show Spoiler

► Show Spoiler

► Show Spoiler

► Show Spoiler

Nothing besides the guillotine is suitable for these people.

[Rand]

Insert "Yes" meme here.
That's the point of the bad reviews.
EAT THE **** YOU SERVED. Eat it ALL up.
You deserve everything that's coming to you, you DEI infested woke gay race commie assholes.

[rusty_shackleford]

Yes meme. That's the point.
EAT THE **** YOU SERVED. Eat it ALL up.
You deserve everything that's coming to you, you woke gay race commie assholes.

summary:
"customers shouldn't be allowed to give us negative reviews"

[Oyster Sauce]

Yes meme. That's the point.
EAT THE **** YOU SERVED. Eat it ALL up.
You deserve everything that's coming to you, you woke gay race commie assholes.

summary:
"customers shouldn't be allowed to give us negative reviews"

Steam hides legitimate reviews pretty frequently so there's no reason for Rockstar not to take advantage.

[rusty_shackleford]

To some extent, I agree with the idea that negative reviews aren't actually helpful — but that's not what they're arguing. The same useful information can be conveyed with an 'informational review' or somesuch without actually downboating the game. But I see many, many useless negative reviews that must be annoying to receive, especially as a small developer.
Perhaps a system like "percent that left a positive review after N hours of playing" metric or somesuch.

[1998]

To some extent, I agree with the idea that negative reviews aren't actually helpful — but that's not what they're arguing. The same useful information can be conveyed with an 'informational review' or somesuch without actually downboating the game. But I see many, many useless negative reviews that must be annoying to receive, especially as a small developer.
Perhaps a system like "percent that left a positive review after N hours of playing" metric or somesuch.

Sure there are tons of useless < 1h reviews, both positive and negative. But if you would introduce a metric like that, you are already skewing the results by potentially leaving out legit negative reviews. Steam scores as it stands right now are already way too high for most games.

Generally, I prefer to filter for only negative, they are overall more useful and in-depth.

[Kalarion]

To some extent, I agree with the idea that negative reviews aren't actually helpful — but that's not what they're arguing. The same useful information can be conveyed with an 'informational review' or somesuch without actually downboating the game. But I see many, many useless negative reviews that must be annoying to receive, especially as a small developer.
Perhaps a system like "percent that left a positive review after N hours of playing" metric or somesuch.

Reviews either shouldn't be used at all to drive filtering mechanisms, or the filtering mechanisms and metrics should be completely exposed to players to allow them to filter on their own. Something like tags (or more likely, just let tags be used by players to handle all filtering decisions).

Trying to make reviews a basis for automated filtering of any kind is taking a sledgehammer to smash a haystack in the hopes a needle will fly out. It's not fit for purpose. On the other hand individual people can deal with exceptions and problems that crop up with filtering on a case-by-case basis.

[UltraFan123]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

[Rand]

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

The fact that you watched this subhuman's moronic nonsense at all is amazing to me.

[Gregz]

******* getting paid by **** to destroy the white man's recreation. Should we be surprised?

[Zothique]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

Is it a he or a she? I'm not certain.

[WhiteShark]

Is it a he or a she? I'm not certain.

Neither is he or she.

[Unhelpful Contrarian]

Okay this is either pure narcissistic delusion or desperation at the face of imminent defeat

Here's the full article: https://thatparkplace.com/sweet-baby-in ... the-ground
If you don't feel like digesting the whole thing, here are some excerpts that I found interesting.

Wild declared “the stories we tell each other are way more than entertainment. They are how we create debate and preserve our collective values and beliefs. And we can and should make better more expansive, more representational content.”

Yeah sure you love "creating debate", unless you're the one being debated against. lol

In the next slide titled “So why am I still here?” One of the bullet points states, “To prove that space where whiteness doesn’t have to live-is where some of the best stories are told.”

Wild explained, “A lot of us who are really fighting for more inclusive games and storytelling don’t have a choice when it comes to discomfort. A lot of us who are just existing don’t have a choice. Which makes this really hard often. But recently I started realizing that discomfort or the place where whiteness doesn’t have to live is where some of the best stories are told. And it’s where genre storytelling lives.”

"Existing is so hard for us! Waaaaah"

“Because you can just tell in the text, but it’s also a fact that Brooks worked with black writers to make sure the jokes came at the expense of whiteness and chipped away in an absurd social hierarchy. It’s deliberately and unexpectedly a narrative that contributes to the liberation of people like me. It isn’t respectful. It’s offensive. But, yeah, it offends the right people, which is to me the point of truly incisive, intentional genre work.”

I do agree that art should be offending the right people, queerfreaks should indeed be offended as much as possible.

However, he then points to Django Unchained being an example of this. While explaining his point of view, Wild stated, “So a context free version of art is supposed to make people uncomfortable. As an autuer Quentin Tarantino feels like someone who grasps after edginess when they don’t really have any human tragedy to explore the depths of. They don’t understand that growth comes from trauma, sure, but it also comes from joy.”

“He holds a no pain no gain mentality that I think is unshakably rooted in white supremacist patriarchal values,” Wild asserted.

This guy and other freaks like him believe that gain should be obtained without any pain, and instead says that gain should come from "joy". lmfao

I couldn't stomach more stupidity after this part.

I truly don’t understand there game plan.


>Burn industry to ground

>Everyone looses there job

>Profit ???????