I didn't play this when it came out; I've been meaning to get around to playing through, but always started and then put off for one reason or another, so this was a good opportunity to get through it. Having played Tactics and later, Fallout 1, comparatively, is tonally more subdued and less in your face with the references, which is a nice change of pace. It's also significantly shorter than I was expecting, unless I happened to miss a lot of points of interest. You can see a lot of the ideas of interactivity that would end up in Arcanum, like healing a guy with an antidote unprompted for XP, but it's not nearly as developed. I can see why it made as big of an impact as it did, but playing this for the first time almost 30 years after its release, it's fine.
We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
Junior Adventurer's Guild: May - Fallout: A Post Nuclear Role Playing Game
Completed. @Oyster Sauce badge me, please.
Thoughts
I didn't play this when it came out; I've been meaning to get around to playing through, but always started and then put off for one reason or another, so this was a good opportunity to get through it. Having played Tactics and later, Fallout 1, comparatively, is tonally more subdued and less in your face with the references, which is a nice change of pace. It's also significantly shorter than I was expecting, unless I happened to miss a lot of points of interest. You can see a lot of the ideas of interactivity that would end up in Arcanum, like healing a guy with an antidote unprompted for XP, but it's not nearly as developed. I can see why it made as big of an impact as it did, but playing this for the first time almost 30 years after its release, it's fine.
► Show Spoiler
I didn't play this when it came out; I've been meaning to get around to playing through, but always started and then put off for one reason or another, so this was a good opportunity to get through it. Having played Tactics and later, Fallout 1, comparatively, is tonally more subdued and less in your face with the references, which is a nice change of pace. It's also significantly shorter than I was expecting, unless I happened to miss a lot of points of interest. You can see a lot of the ideas of interactivity that would end up in Arcanum, like healing a guy with an antidote unprompted for XP, but it's not nearly as developed. I can see why it made as big of an impact as it did, but playing this for the first time almost 30 years after its release, it's fine.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I nominate The Witcher 1. I better not see any of you side with nonhumans
Steam friend code: 1525876263
First time playing FO1 (beat FO2 before), so pls no bully on the ez metagaming build
@Oyster Sauce badge please and thank you
► Show Spoiler
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
So, 200 percent, huh?
I didn't know what else to spend points on. I didn't anticipate switching to energy weapons, but then I got a plasma rifle.
I thought I remembered from playing FO2 that only some skills were helpful beyond 100% and it was only the combat ones. Also, I was playing Fallout1in2, so I'm not sure if that changes anything.
Edit: It does seem that going beyond 100% reduces some accuracy penalties. I was using a sniper rifle before switching to the plasma.
Last edited by enisey on May 24th, 2026, 17:26, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah, I think around 120 the diminishing returns are so low you don't need to invest any more.
I've never heard of Elex. I think you meant ELEX.
Then I'll rationalize it as roleplaying. Just ignore the other min-maxed stats.Acrux wrote: ↑ May 24th, 2026, 17:38Yeah, I think around 120 the diminishing returns are so low you don't need to invest any more.
Is there any ingame indication of this?Acrux wrote: ↑ May 24th, 2026, 17:38Yeah, I think around 120 the diminishing returns are so low you don't need to invest any more.
Steam friend code: 1525876263
You get in combat every so often.Valter wrote: ↑ May 24th, 2026, 18:21Is there any ingame indication of this?Acrux wrote: ↑ May 24th, 2026, 17:38Yeah, I think around 120 the diminishing returns are so low you don't need to invest any more.
the 1 intelligence can be helped by Mentats and severe addiction. just so people with a low intel can still function at a low communication level and not be hosed by not having dialog choices.
yes i know many who see this will already know this or have a better or alternative way around this.
yes just killing everyone is an option too. except the overseer you need to turn the chip into.
can we get a mod to make it where if you kill everyone in vault 13 you don't need to turn in the chip
or is it already that way?
yes i know many who see this will already know this or have a better or alternative way around this.
yes just killing everyone is an option too. except the overseer you need to turn the chip into.
can we get a mod to make it where if you kill everyone in vault 13 you don't need to turn in the chip
or is it already that way?
Last edited by Killagain665 on May 24th, 2026, 19:29, edited 3 times in total.
I forfeit my nomination this month since someone already has a better idea .
Eyestabber wrote: ↑ May 8th, 2026, 21:41By the power invested in me by this nice RPGHQJAG badge, I rally the forces of GOOD and INCLINE and nominate The Temple of Elemental Evil for the next poll.
https://www.gog.com/en/game/the_temple_ ... ental_evil
a day may come rpg.jpg
Nominating Planescape: Torment
Don't complain about split vote in a couple days...
Wouldn't worry about that. Clearly 120% of the vote will go to Dark Messiah!
Oh ****, are we gonna have mail in ballots for DM? Safest election ever!!!J1M wrote: ↑ May 26th, 2026, 22:00Wouldn't worry about that. Clearly 120% of the vote will go to Dark Messiah!
I don't understand the point in participating in these things.
-
rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 45443
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
You get a neat badge!
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Who gives a ****? (apparently a lot of you do)
-
rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 45443
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
No reason to be upset because you don't have a badge, you can start today.Algol wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:47Who gives a ****? (apparently a lot of you do)
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Yeah, and I'm going to keep it that way.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:47No reason to be upset because you don't have a badge, you can start today.![]()
You are so cool dudeAlgol wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:49Yeah, and I'm going to keep it that way.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:47No reason to be upset because you don't have a badge, you can start today.![]()
⩩ Lord Jesus Christ, O Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner ⩩
It's fun. Just like gaming itself.Algol wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:47Who gives a ****? (apparently a lot of you do)
Someone should give him a yellow paint badge.Algol wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:49Yeah, and I'm going to keep it that way.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:47No reason to be upset because you don't have a badge, you can start today.![]()
I don't.Algol wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 01:47Who gives a ****? (apparently a lot of you do)
You could do it because you want to be part of the community.
The majority of RPG discussion online is based on 20 year old vague memories. It would be better with fresh opinions.
But if you don't play old games every now and then, what else are you even playing? AAA slop? Derivative "retro" slop? Gooner Slop?Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 03:19The majority of RPG discussion online is based on 20 year old vague memories. It would be better with fresh opinions.
Complaining about games you haven't played onlineTinky Winky wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 06:48But if you don't play old games every now and then, what else are you even playing? AAA slop? Derivative "retro" slop? Gooner Slop?Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ May 27th, 2026, 03:19The majority of RPG discussion online is based on 20 year old vague memories. It would be better with fresh opinions.
