Are video game devs inherently dirty commies, or did blackrock make them that way?

[Magick]

Because the few that aren't, can't get any funding.

The reason there aren't any non-libtard developers is because libtards purge ranks. They infiltrate libertarian spaces and take over.

And the ESG funding supports them in doing that, and gets throttled to anyone who doesn't bend the knee.

^ This is just the END result. The companies controlling the trillions of your tax and especially workplace pension investments, are who are controlling this. It's MUCH, MUCH bigger than just Vanguard & Blackrock.

[rusty_shackleford]

Because the few that aren't, can't get any funding.

The reason there aren't any non-libtard developers is because libtards purge ranks. They infiltrate libertarian spaces and take over.

And the ESG funding supports them in doing that, and gets throttled to anyone who doesn't bend the knee.

^ This is just the END result. The companies controlling the trillions of your tax and especially workplace pension investments, are who are controlling this. It's MUCH, MUCH bigger than just Vanguard & Blackrock.

If you make money, there are investment firms that will invest in your company.
How 'woke' do you think the Saudi Arabia national oil company is? The CEO of Aramco is on the board of blackrock: https://ir.blackrock.com/news-and-event ... fault.aspx

These are the people who care only about money, not the game developers.

[Irenaeus]

How 'woke' do you think the Saudi Arabia national oil company is? The CEO of Aramco is on the board of blackrock: https://ir.blackrock.com/news-and-event ... fault.aspx

Reminder that Saudi Arabia and Israel are allies. The CEO of Aramco probably shits on a different hooker every few hours (he has diarhea from filthy arab food).

[WaterMage]

waiting for the inevitable "larian put bear **** gay romance in their game because um… their private company is seeking ESG funding!!!"

Nope. They are the company which believes in the Baizuo religion. But the point is not that the woke insanity started with ESG, is just that ESG trowed fuel to the fire and made problems like incompetent diversity hires producing woke bugfests much worse.

This problem dates Frankfurt infection in the west.

[rusty_shackleford]

They are the company which believes in the Baizuo religion.

They all believe in it. There's an extreme COOOOPE from the right-wing that these companies are just doing it for the money. They have religious devotion to watching their wife get railed by the BVLL that can only be matched by people who are similarly religious.

[WhiteShark]

They all believe in it. There's an extreme COOOOPE from the right-wing that these companies are just doing it for the money. They have religious devotion to watching their wife get railed by the BVLL that can only be matched by people who are similarly religious.

And they can sustain this despite it being massively unpopular because of BlackRock and co.

[rusty_shackleford]

They all believe in it. There's an extreme COOOOPE from the right-wing that these companies are just doing it for the money. They have religious devotion to watching their wife get railed by the BVLL that can only be matched by people who are similarly religious.

And they can sustain this despite it being massively unpopular because of BlackRock and co.

If they can sustain it why are so many being fired and shut down?

[rusty_shackleford]

This is effectively the same argument the game journos make: "if you're so rich, why do you keep firing developers REEEE"
Because corporations like blackcock only care about money. Fink is a moneyjew, he's acquiring his dragon's hoard.

[WhiteShark]

If they can sustain it why are so many being fired and shut down?

That's fair. I suppose I should have said that they could sustain it, because they've been doing this for a long time now while financial necessity should have made it stop much sooner. Of course, they're still not really stopping, just cutting their losses a little.

[gerey]

just cutting their losses a little.

To note is that singular publishers and developers don't really matter, since they have a stranglehold on nearly the whole gaming industry. All they care about is output of Marxist slop.

Also, just like BlackRock recently announcing they'd retire ESG (in favor of a new scheme with the exact same purpose), they'll also stop supporting developers that the majority of the public views as political. They're desperate to not make too many gentiles realize they're trying to socially engineer them.

I vehemently disagree that profit is Fink's motive, because if he wanted to make money, he wouldn't keep financing projects laced with propaganda that is proven to drive customers away.

[rusty_shackleford]

I vehemently disagree that profit is Fink's motive, because if he wanted to make money, he wouldn't keep financing projects laced with propaganda that is proven to drive customers away.

they'll also stop supporting developers that the majority of the public views as political.

?

[Irenaeus]

I vehemently disagree that profit is Fink's motive, because if he wanted to make money, he wouldn't keep financing projects laced with propaganda that is proven to drive customers away.

they'll also stop supporting developers that the majority of the public views as political.

?

They're desperate to not make too many gentiles realize they're trying to socially engineer them.

[gerey]

Again, they have no need to care about developers in the singular sense, since they control the whole industry.

If FInk was in it to make money wouldn't the ESG guidelines encourage developers to make content that is proven to be profitable (as in, pandering to heterosexual men), instead of slop aimed at a tiny minority of mentally ill women and *******?

Do explain how BlackRock is trying to make money by actively encouraging developers to sabotage their projects.

[Magick]

This is effectively the same argument the game journos make: "if you're so rich, why do you keep firing developers REEEE"
Because corporations like blackcock only care about money. Fink is a moneyjew, he's acquiring his dragon's hoard.

It's more about societal destruction and control. The money flows in afterwards and via other means as that's happening.
If they 'only' cared about money, they'd be investing in whatever makes money, and not throttling only to companies that bow to ESG.
And like I said it's not just Blackrock and the private firms, it's all those that handle your tax & pension investments, which is a LOT of money only being thrown into certain pots.

They ONLY give it to funds that pledge ESG compliance, and those funds then only invest in companies that do the same. These are audited to make sure they're doing what they say.
The "money making" companies (regardless of ESG or not) are then invested in privately, rather than via the funds, however this is in much smaller amounts. This is why you see one or two projects make "just enough" profit (to give a few mil back to the moneybag ****), but industries as a whole die and/or become corrupted.

Blackrock itself is a red herring, this is much, much much bigger than that. We're talking YOUR money here, not just the private "investors".

[Irenaeus]

I said upstairs it's called "looting a country". Look it up.


Anyway, back to celebrating ****** gamedevs being fired.

[rusty_shackleford]

Again, they have no need to care about developers in the singular sense, since they control the whole industry.

If FInk was in it to make money wouldn't the ESG guidelines encourage developers to make content that is proven to be profitable (as in, pandering to heterosexual men), instead of slop aimed at a tiny minority of mentally ill women and *******?

Do explain how BlackRock is trying to make money by actively encouraging developers to sabotage their projects.

have you looked at how much money blackcock manages lately?
I don't think they care in the least about videogames.

[rusty_shackleford]

They ONLY give it to funds that pledge ESG compliance

Blackrock owns 17.2% of Sturm & Ruger(which has been increasing in the past few years FYI.) Do you think Ruger pledges "ESG compliance"?

[gerey]

I don't think they care in the least about videogames.

So you agree that they're not in it for the money?

[rusty_shackleford]

I don't think they care in the least about videogames.

So you agree that they're not in it for the money?

The section of video games that makes a ton of money is mobile.

[Val the Moofia Boss]

"Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League."

Never heard of this game until now. Sounds like more satanic crap about inverting what is good and holy.

[Nooneatall]

Typical Rusty trolling thread lol. Companies want the esg money so they hire women and browns and ****. Those people get even more esg money by making their game extremely gay. No sales but no one gives a **** because gamers aren't the cash cow, investors are and investors want more gays.
I think it's all probably true, Millennials are very gay and annoying and they are the game devs now and they are rewarded for it by these jew companies that invest

[gerey]

Millennials are very gay and annoying and they are the game devs now and they are rewarded for it by these jew companies that invest

The "spike" of LGBT oven dodgers among millennials is almost exclusively women claiming they are bisexual. The true percentage of sodomites hasn't changed significantly since they've begun tracking their numbers.

As for the hires, that's likely less down to the majority of millennials being liberals, and more by the fact the companies selectively hire leftists, and purge anyone that isn't as ideologically pure as them.

Simple truth is that any community that doesn't proactively keep leftists out, will be consumed by them eventually.

[wndrbr]

"Nnno, wokeness is an entirely natural thing, Blackrock and ESG have nothing to do with it, it's the devs that are to blame, move along, nothing to see here"

[rusty_shackleford]

"Nnno, wokeness is an entirely natural thing, Blackrock and ESG have nothing to do with it, it's the devs that are to blame, move along, nothing to see here"

<@Rusty_Shackleford> fink is a moneyjew making money off of people who are irreversibly demoralized
<@Rusty_Shackleford> *invest in company before they announce EXCITING NEW TITLE* *divest right before it ships*
<@Rusty_Shackleford> and you guys probably think I'm being ******, but no. Here's an example: multiple investment funds owned significant amounts of CDPR prior to the release of cyberpozz. Now, not a single non-Polish entity owns a significant amount of shares.
<@Rusty_Shackleford> vanguard, fidelity, blackrock, etc., all owned significant amounts of CDPR and divested

[Decline]

"Nnno, wokeness is an entirely natural thing, Blackrock and ESG have nothing to do with it, it's the devs that are to blame, move along, nothing to see here"

<@Rusty_Shackleford> fink is a moneyjew making money off of people who are irreversibly demoralized
<@Rusty_Shackleford> *invest in company before they announce EXCITING NEW TITLE* *divest right before it ships*
<@Rusty_Shackleford> and you guys probably think I'm being ******, but no. Here's an example: multiple investment funds owned significant amounts of CDPR prior to the release of cyberpozz. Now, not a single non-Polish entity owns a significant amount of shares.
<@Rusty_Shackleford> vanguard, fidelity, blackrock, etc., all owned significant amounts of CDPR and divested

Rusty, any random portfolio tracker on the internet will tell you this never happened.
Why do you keep making things up?

[rusty_shackleford]

"Nnno, wokeness is an entirely natural thing, Blackrock and ESG have nothing to do with it, it's the devs that are to blame, move along, nothing to see here"

<@Rusty_Shackleford> fink is a moneyjew making money off of people who are irreversibly demoralized
<@Rusty_Shackleford> *invest in company before they announce EXCITING NEW TITLE* *divest right before it ships*
<@Rusty_Shackleford> and you guys probably think I'm being ******, but no. Here's an example: multiple investment funds owned significant amounts of CDPR prior to the release of cyberpozz. Now, not a single non-Polish entity owns a significant amount of shares.
<@Rusty_Shackleford> vanguard, fidelity, blackrock, etc., all owned significant amounts of CDPR and divested

Rusty, any random portfolio tracker on the internet will tell you this never happened.
Why do you keep making things up?

cope
https://web.archive.org/web/20200828223 ... 7/company/
https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/st ... 7/company/

[Gregz]

The youth are gullible, idealistic, and vulnerable to suggestion. BlackRock, AKA ****, programmed all of them to genocide themselves and to serve jewish interests. What better army of golems could you ask for?

[rusty_shackleford]

The youth

Marcin Piotr Iwiński (born June 30, 1974).

[Gregz]

The youth

Marcin Piotr Iwiński (born June 30, 1974).

The media (news and entertainment) are owned and controlled by *****. They program these kids from a very tender and malleable age. After that, they are then handed off to the educational complex, which just so happens to also be dominated by ****. These ***** operate as a collective; this is not the product of one person. It's been happening like this for decades now.

[rusty_shackleford]

The youth

Marcin Piotr Iwiński (born June 30, 1974).

The media (news and entertainment) are owned and controlled by *****. They program these kids from a very tender and malleable age. After that, they are then handed off to the educational complex, which just so happens to also be dominated by ****. These ***** operate as a collective; this is not the product of one person. It's been happening like this for decades now.

The funniest part of gregz's posts are when you remember he's actually jewish