AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:00majority of women don't look like super models like in video games

AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:00majority of women don't look like super models like in video games

And guess what, the large majority of the women (of any ethnicity btw) LOVE barbie. Go figure...rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:16AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:00majority of women don't look like super models like in video games![]()
He-man is badass dude.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:16AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:00majority of women don't look like super models like in video games![]()
I really hate the weird pseudo-armor prevalent in much of fantasy
Nooneatall wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:24He-man is badass dude.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:16AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:00majority of women don't look like super models like in video games![]()
the sexlab defeat is very old mod by now and it does all that.aweigh wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 19:07we also need rape in games where it's natural, like all those female bandits and female barbarians who try to kill you in Skyrim. Obviously they would be mercilessly raped in real life, but there's no way to do that in the game.Red7 wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 17:00what about non gay players that want to rape vagina in game (if its multiplayer)?
**** are always so self centered.
this is an inherent problem with having female enemies in games. the reality is the player character would just rape them, but this is never properly implemented in the games.
It depends. Is it multiplayer? Or maybe you're streaming it? In single player, you probably want your guy to look good. But if there's an additional audience, sometimes you just want to make the most hideous eyesore you can, so that everyone else has to see that. God created ugly people for a reason, after all.BobT wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:46What's this "expectation"? Since when is someone expecting YOU to be like something in a game, just because you're playing it?
Also in RPGs when you're PLAYING a ROLE, why would you choose to play a fat **** with a belly? Unless you're literally playing one of those Ugly ******* hentai rape games from Red7's library.
That's why I put "unless it literally has a character creator in which case, enjoy." And in the multiplayer scenario, you're then doing it for the laughs, not just to make yourself feel better..Norfleet wrote: ↑ April 10th, 2024, 19:32It depends. Is it multiplayer? Or maybe you're streaming it? In single player, you probably want your guy to look good. But if there's an additional audience, sometimes you just want to make the most hideous eyesore you can, so that everyone else has to see that. God created ugly people for a reason, after all.BobT wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:46What's this "expectation"? Since when is someone expecting YOU to be like something in a game, just because you're playing it?
Also in RPGs when you're PLAYING a ROLE, why would you choose to play a fat **** with a belly? Unless you're literally playing one of those Ugly ******* hentai rape games from Red7's library.
The modern rejection of beauty is part of the left agenda to have people hate the past, and to despise everything that is good, in order to tolerate that which is not.BobT wrote: ↑ April 10th, 2024, 19:33That's why I put "unless it literally has a character creator in which case, enjoy." And in the multiplayer scenario, you're then doing it for the laughs, not just to make yourself feel better..
You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.Anon wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:21And guess what, the large majority of the women (of any ethnicity btw) LOVE barbie. Go figure...rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:16AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:00majority of women don't look like super models like in video games![]()
I don't want to reject beauty btw. But I think it's a subjective thing. For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay. I don't find all men/women attractive either.TKVNC wrote: ↑ April 10th, 2024, 19:41The modern rejection of beauty is part of the left agenda to have people hate the past, and to despise everything that is good, in order to tolerate that which is not.BobT wrote: ↑ April 10th, 2024, 19:33That's why I put "unless it literally has a character creator in which case, enjoy." And in the multiplayer scenario, you're then doing it for the laughs, not just to make yourself feel better..
Because, as in the Hollow Men, they want to dismantle the old world, with a "whimper". The best way to achieve this is to errode all that is good, until nothing but sadness and apathy remains.
WTF is this another gay man on my polish RPG forum? I tell you this place has gone to the dogs.AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:25For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay.
I'm not saying you are, but then I'm not surprised a woman can't understand how averages and outliers work. Regardless, Slopdivers using the same model for both Sexes is textbook woke. orin put it pretty well:AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:25I don't want to reject beauty btw. But I think it's a subjective thing. For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay. I don't find all men/women attractive either.
I am also conflicted on the idea of subjective beauty - as I would argue certain opinions are demonstrable wrong, or the work of a corrupted mind. I will not go into much detail in this regard, as it opens the gateway to semantics, and pointless argumentation -- the short, and more interesting view, I would propose, is that the idea of 'subjective' beauty is a woke tool, employed to convince people that you cannot shame a view that is not commonly held, because, it's just like your opinion man. However, for nearly all of human history, certain standards have remained constant.orinEsque wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:08Erasing the female form is a direct attack on women by ****** that can never have it.
hoeflation is outrageous these days
Yep... Terms like symmetry, consonance, etc... are all terms used to describe those standards you mention. Most people find such things pleasing being of that nature (ie shapes, sound, and colors), establishing it as the normality of the human perception. The contrast to them are established as such throughout history of various arts. One can certainly say they individually find asymmetry, dissonant sounds, or clashing colors appealing, but it is not because they are "pleasing" generally, as a rule, but more of an individual taste to which they subjectively established due to various reasons.TKVNC wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:57I'm not saying you are, but then I'm not surprised a woman can't understand how averages and outliers work. Regardless, Slopdivers using the same model for both Sexes is textbook woke. orin put it pretty well:AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:25I don't want to reject beauty btw. But I think it's a subjective thing. For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay. I don't find all men/women attractive either.
I am also conflicted on the idea of subjective beauty - as I would argue certain opinions are demonstrable wrong, or the work of a corrupted mind. I will not go into much detail in this regard, as it opens the gateway to semantics, and pointless argumentation -- the short, and more interesting view, I would propose, is that the idea of 'subjective' beauty is a woke tool, employed to convince people that you cannot shame a view that is not commonly held, because, it's just like your opinion man. However, for nearly all of human history, certain standards have remained constant.orinEsque wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 16:08Erasing the female form is a direct attack on women by ****** that can never have it.
Time to change the name to GayPoleHQA Chinese opium den wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:43WTF is this another gay man on my polish RPG forum? I tell you this place has gone to the dogs.AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:25For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay.
The vanity and narscissm of this ****.AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:25I don't want to reject beauty btw. But I think it's a subjective thing. For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay. I don't find all men/women attractive either.TKVNC wrote: ↑ April 10th, 2024, 19:41The modern rejection of beauty is part of the left agenda to have people hate the past, and to despise everything that is good, in order to tolerate that which is not.BobT wrote: ↑ April 10th, 2024, 19:33That's why I put "unless it literally has a character creator in which case, enjoy." And in the multiplayer scenario, you're then doing it for the laughs, not just to make yourself feel better..
Because, as in the Hollow Men, they want to dismantle the old world, with a "whimper". The best way to achieve this is to errode all that is good, until nothing but sadness and apathy remains.
Maximilian Armour makes me bust.

Which flaws do you see in Barbie? Imo she represents the feminine universe extremely well. And the "oh but you're a man" card can't be pulled considering her massive feminine fanbase.AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:21You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.Anon wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:21And guess what, the large majority of the women (of any ethnicity btw) LOVE barbie. Go figure...
Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.AliciaDurge wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 16:21You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.Anon wrote: ↑ April 9th, 2024, 21:21And guess what, the large majority of the women (of any ethnicity btw) LOVE barbie. Go figure...
Cipher wrote: ↑ April 16th, 2024, 00:59Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.
Its a modded version of Clara from the Beamdog BG2.ArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ April 16th, 2024, 01:05Cipher wrote: ↑ April 16th, 2024, 00:59Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.The AI pfp looks pretty ugly already. Mid at best.
NOOOOOO! MY MIXED RACE FAMILY!!!Irenaeus wrote: ↑ April 15th, 2024, 23:08
Until I posted this meme I was reading the thread and almost forgot what it's about.

Multiplayer, melee-focused Roman Empire game when? Sexy gladiators, gore, violence and degeneracy everywhere. You'd think modern devs would love using it as a setting, hmm...
Well I've rejected most of those men lol. I just acknowledge that I fit some of the beauty standards that men find attractive. Attratcion doesn't equal to action.