No Alphabets 7.1 — Baldur's Gate 3

[rusty_shackleford]

**** I'm sure Larian will never survive this

As far as I understand it's not even related to larian…

[Face]

What in the ****, they have MORE to add?

They think they do, but they don't. This is just what happens when Discord trannydom, modfaggotry and hyperautism intersects. Which unfortunately is more like a full sphere than anything resembling a proper venn diagram.

This is why I don't jump on all these different offered discord servers.

[Luckmann]

What in the ****, they have MORE to add?

They think they do, but they don't. This is just what happens when Discord trannydom, modfaggotry and hyperautism intersects. Which unfortunately is more like a full sphere than anything resembling a proper venn diagram.

This is why I don't jump on all these different offered discord servers.

Very reasonable. (see my signature for reference)

► Show Spoiler

Everyone knows that the truly patrician way to deal with this whole thing is to join Larian's server, offhandedly criticize China or the CCP, and immediately be permanently banned for it.

[MadRussian]

Sorry to be a ******* tard, but what was updated on 02/22? ModHQ page says the mod was updated but I don't see any files updated with that date on the first page.

[orinEsque]

Sorry to be a ******* tard, but what was updated on 02/22? ModHQ page says the mod was updated but I don't see any files updated with that date on the first page.

Formatting. I am always updating formatting and description.

If I publish a mod change I always make a post about it. And the date updated will also change in the table. I've put a subscribestar link (free) in case you want notifications for mod updates specifically.

[Faceless_Sentinel]

Hello,

Sorry for going off topic, since I really liked BG3, I took the liberty of taking Divinity 2, are there LGBT things and racial quotas? Does anyone have any mods to recommend for this game?

I played through the first act and begining of the second and if i remember correctly, the only thing that considered as LGBT is in the begging of the second act all your companions regardless of sex ask you the same question in different wordings, witch can be summarized as: "Why do you care about me so much?" and you regardless of sex can romance companion or be friend with him/her (Thanks God there only he or she among companions).

[Dreogan]

Something struck me the other day. Almost every person in a top leadership position in this game (with the exception of villains) are females (and even those villains often have 2nd-in-commands who are female). There are exceptions, but it's far from a 50/50 split, and it seems the bigger the role of the organization the greater the odds it's headed by a woman. (A woman even owns the forge that Dammon works at in Act 3.) I guess the only surprise is that this didn't strike me sooner.

[orinEsque]

Something struck me the other day. Almost every person in a top leadership position in this game (with the exception of villains) are females (and even those villains often have 2nd-in-commands who are female). There are exceptions, but it's far from a 50/50 split, and it seems the bigger the role of the organization the greater the odds it's headed by a woman. (A woman even owns the forge that Dammon works at in Act 3.) I guess the only surprise is that this didn't strike me sooner.

You might be interested in this thread: viewtopic.php?t=1475-baldurs-gate-3-def ... od-request

Something to do for the future.

[ANONYMOUS_FRI3ND]

Hello,

Sorry for going off topic, since I really liked BG3, I took the liberty of taking Divinity 2, are there LGBT things and racial quotas? Does anyone have any mods to recommend for this game?

I played Divinity: Original Sin 2 for 500 hours and didn't see a single LGBT person among the NPCs there. At least, there definitely weren't any among the main NPCs, I'm 100 percent sure of that. And that's why I was shocked when I saw so many LGBT NPCs in BG3. I didn't expect such a dirty trick from Larian.

[Xenich]

@orinEsque

Quick question about your modding. Does BG3 allow for any real serious adjustments to mechanics of the game, for instance as the original D:OS engine released, or are you constrained to working mostly with the assets and existing functionality of the game?

[orinEsque]

Hello,

Sorry for going off topic, since I really liked BG3, I took the liberty of taking Divinity 2, are there LGBT things and racial quotas? Does anyone have any mods to recommend for this game?

I played Divinity: Original Sin 2 for 500 hours and didn't see a single LGBT person among the NPCs there. At least, there definitely weren't any among the main NPCs, I'm 100 percent sure of that. And that's why I was shocked when I saw so many LGBT NPCs in BG3. I didn't expect such a dirty trick from Larian.

Either it's WOTSC's stipulations or Sweet Baby consultation. It doesn't feel like Larian at all to me.

[Xenich]

Hello,

Sorry for going off topic, since I really liked BG3, I took the liberty of taking Divinity 2, are there LGBT things and racial quotas? Does anyone have any mods to recommend for this game?

I played Divinity: Original Sin 2 for 500 hours and didn't see a single LGBT person among the NPCs there. At least, there definitely weren't any among the main NPCs, I'm 100 percent sure of that. And that's why I was shocked when I saw so many LGBT NPCs in BG3. I didn't expect such a dirty trick from Larian.

It's been a long time since I played it, but I remember there was some of it in D:OS 2 and I remember some people giving them flack as they ramped it up to a more noticeable occurrence over D:OS.

[Anon]

I also thought that but Larian seems pretty serious on the trooning. And I think they got real cash from the alphabets adopting BG3 as "the lgbtqia+-friendly game", while the normal crowd also bought the game bacause of lack of better things in the market (and not knowing how alphabetized the game was). We'll be sure on their next game.

[orinEsque]

@orinEsque

Quick question about your modding. Does BG3 allow for any real serious adjustments to mechanics of the game, for instance as the original D:OS engine released, or are you constrained to working mostly with the assets and existing functionality of the game?

We are able to add things to the game using scriptextender, though that isn't my expertise.
Even without Scriptextender we can create new assets like weapons etc. Dialogue can be added but mouth won't move. NPC can be added as well.. I accidentally added a duplicate of an NPC once.

[Xenich]

@orinEsque

Quick question about your modding. Does BG3 allow for any real serious adjustments to mechanics of the game, for instance as the original D:OS engine released, or are you constrained to working mostly with the assets and existing functionality of the game?

We are able to add things to the game using scriptextender, though that isn't my expertise.
Even without Scriptextender we can create new assets like weapons etc. Dialogue can be added but mouth won't move. NPC can be added as well.. I accidentally added a duplicate of an NPC once.

Interesting, I will be sure to pick your brain and read your guides in the foundry. Thanks!

[Xenich]

I also thought that but Larian seems pretty serious on the trooning. And I think they got real cash from the alphabets adopting BG3 as "the lgbtqia+-friendly game", while the normal crowd also bought the game bacause of lack of better things in the market (and not knowing how alphabetized the game was). We'll be sure on their next game.

Which is also ironic due to their response at the developer awards about serving their player base. Doesn't seem they understand who their player base is with the result of their game.

Sven has been careful in the past I think because they were really running the tanks empty on D:OS and it had to be a success I think as they were all in.

Seems pretty silly for him to put all that work into his company only to toss it to the wind for political virtual signaling by releasing such content. Someone has to be leveraging him with some type of promise of reward, because we both know that a continued attention to that focus will eventually lead to the failure of his projects over time. If they get worse or repeat another BG3, I am not sure it will do nearly as well. I know many who feel very slighted by how BG3 turned out.

[Anon]

I also thought that but Larian seems pretty serious on the trooning. And I think they got real cash from the alphabets adopting BG3 as "the lgbtqia+-friendly game", while the normal crowd also bought the game bacause of lack of better things in the market (and not knowing how alphabetized the game was). We'll be sure on their next game.

Which is also ironic due to their response at the developer awards about serving their player base. Doesn't seem they understand who their player base is with the result of their game.

Sven has been careful in the past I think because they were really running the tanks empty on D:OS and it had to be a success I think as they were all in.

Seems pretty silly for him to put all that work into his company only to toss it to the wind for political virtual signaling by releasing such content. Someone has to be leveraging him with some type of promise of reward, because we both know that a continued attention to that focus will eventually lead to the failure of his projects over time. If they get worse or repeat another BG3, I am not sure it will do nearly as well. I know many who feel very slighted by how BG3 turned out.

Yeah we'll have to wait and see their next game to give a verdict. But I say I'd be very surprised if they do another 180º and erases wokeism from their next game. Definitely not betting on that.

[Dreogan]

Either it's WOTSC's stipulations or Sweet Baby consultation. It doesn't feel like Larian at all to me.

WotC and Hasbro are particularly aggressive on this front. Still, I find it hard to believe Larian itself hasn't heavily infiltrated by activist devs over the past five years (if it's bad in Europe as it is in the US/Canada, and I've no reason to suspect it isn't). It's everywhere in games now.

Did Sweet Baby actually work on BG3, or are you just alluding to that style of creative-subversive activism in general?

[Dreogan]

...
Seems pretty silly for him to put all that work into his company only to toss it to the wind for political virtual signaling by releasing such content. Someone has to be leveraging him with some type of promise of reward, because we both know that a continued attention to that focus will eventually lead to the failure of his projects over time. If they get worse or repeat another BG3, I am not sure it will do nearly as well. I know many who feel very slighted by how BG3 turned out.

Well Disney isn't learning despite catastrophic financial repercussions. I doubt Larian will believe it's suffering any impact from feelings while it's drowning in revenue. However, if Sven watches wider industry trends he might realize the current absurdist take on Diversity isn't a long-term winner, and could well compromise a future release (that doesn't come with DnD's current built-in Theater Kid audience). I'm fairly sure he's smart enough to not use BG3's good fortune to bind himself to another third party's IP and influence going forward, so whatever they do next will be a Divinity title or something completely new that Larian will own. Beyond that it's all guesswork.

I also know that purging a studio of subversives, or somehow keeping them around while shutting them up, would be an ugly battle. And those elements will feel emboldened by BG3, and will push even harder to make the next game even more extreme. So if he's even inclined to resist (and I've no expectation that he is), it will be an internal and PR bloodbath. So don't get your hopes up. Being in the rare position of having the cache to do the right thing has never guaranteed one won't just do the wrong thing anyway.

[orinEsque]

Either it's WOTSC's stipulations or Sweet Baby consultation. It doesn't feel like Larian at all to me.

WotC and Hasbro are particularly aggressive on this front. Still, I find it hard to believe Larian itself hasn't heavily infiltrated by activist devs over the past five years (if it's bad in Europe as it is in the US/Canada, and I've no reason to suspect it isn't). It's everywhere in games now.

Did Sweet Baby actually work on BG3, or are you just alluding to that style of creative-subversive activism in general?

It's a suspicion, considering the entire game seems to be gendered under the bonnet and every ***** appears at end of act 2 and onwards. They came in and made it lame and gay.

[Anon]

...
Seems pretty silly for him to put all that work into his company only to toss it to the wind for political virtual signaling by releasing such content. Someone has to be leveraging him with some type of promise of reward, because we both know that a continued attention to that focus will eventually lead to the failure of his projects over time. If they get worse or repeat another BG3, I am not sure it will do nearly as well. I know many who feel very slighted by how BG3 turned out.

Well Disney isn't learning despite catastrophic financial repercussions. I doubt Larian will believe it's suffering any impact from feelings while it's drowning in revenue. However, if Sven watches wider industry trends he might realize the current absurdist take on Diversity isn't a long-term winner, and could well compromise a future release (that doesn't come with DnD's current built-in Theater Kid audience). I'm fairly sure he's smart enough to not use BG3's good fortune to bind himself to another third party's IP and influence going forward, so whatever they do next will be a Divinity title or something completely new that Larian will own. Beyond that it's all guesswork.

I also know that purging a studio of subversives, or somehow keeping them around while shutting them up, would be an ugly battle. And those elements will feel emboldened by BG3, and will push even harder to make the next game even more extreme. So if he's even inclined to resist (and I've no expectation that he is), it will be an internal and PR bloodbath. So don't get your hopes up. Being in the rare position of having the cache to do the right thing has never guaranteed one won't just do the wrong thing anyway.

I suspect Disney is being sustained through jew money (just see their stocks keeping going up despite multiple failures) so customer money isn't as important for them anymore.

Larian I believe is still relying on actual customer money, so they do need their **** to be successful.

[orinEsque]

...
Seems pretty silly for him to put all that work into his company only to toss it to the wind for political virtual signaling by releasing such content. Someone has to be leveraging him with some type of promise of reward, because we both know that a continued attention to that focus will eventually lead to the failure of his projects over time. If they get worse or repeat another BG3, I am not sure it will do nearly as well. I know many who feel very slighted by how BG3 turned out.

Well Disney isn't learning despite catastrophic financial repercussions. I doubt Larian will believe it's suffering any impact from feelings while it's drowning in revenue. However, if Sven watches wider industry trends he might realize the current absurdist take on Diversity isn't a long-term winner, and could well compromise a future release (that doesn't come with DnD's current built-in Theater Kid audience). I'm fairly sure he's smart enough to not use BG3's good fortune to bind himself to another third party's IP and influence going forward, so whatever they do next will be a Divinity title or something completely new that Larian will own. Beyond that it's all guesswork.

I also know that purging a studio of subversives, or somehow keeping them around while shutting them up, would be an ugly battle. And those elements will feel emboldened by BG3, and will push even harder to make the next game even more extreme. So if he's even inclined to resist (and I've no expectation that he is), it will be an internal and PR bloodbath. So don't get your hopes up. Being in the rare position of having the cache to do the right thing has never guaranteed one won't just do the wrong thing anyway.

I suspect Disney is being sustained through jew money (just see their stocks keeping going up despite multiple failures) so customer money isn't as important for them anymore.

Larian I believe is still relying on actual customer money, so they do need their **** to be successful.

They keep printing money... while we suffer the consequence. Ah ****.. i derailed the topic .

[Xenich]

...
Seems pretty silly for him to put all that work into his company only to toss it to the wind for political virtual signaling by releasing such content. Someone has to be leveraging him with some type of promise of reward, because we both know that a continued attention to that focus will eventually lead to the failure of his projects over time. If they get worse or repeat another BG3, I am not sure it will do nearly as well. I know many who feel very slighted by how BG3 turned out.

Well Disney isn't learning despite catastrophic financial repercussions. I doubt Larian will believe it's suffering any impact from feelings while it's drowning in revenue. However, if Sven watches wider industry trends he might realize the current absurdist take on Diversity isn't a long-term winner, and could well compromise a future release (that doesn't come with DnD's current built-in Theater Kid audience). I'm fairly sure he's smart enough to not use BG3's good fortune to bind himself to another third party's IP and influence going forward, so whatever they do next will be a Divinity title or something completely new that Larian will own. Beyond that it's all guesswork.

I also know that purging a studio of subversives, or somehow keeping them around while shutting them up, would be an ugly battle. And those elements will feel emboldened by BG3, and will push even harder to make the next game even more extreme. So if he's even inclined to resist (and I've no expectation that he is), it will be an internal and PR bloodbath. So don't get your hopes up. Being in the rare position of having the cache to do the right thing has never guaranteed one won't just do the wrong thing anyway.

Yeah, I get you. I know for me personally, if BG3 didn't have all the check marks (BG title due to nostalgia, D&D ruleset even though I am not fond of 5th edition, and Larians approach to mechanics), I would have never even bothered to play it (and there are a lot of games I find interesting, but move on from without even playing due to these narratives). I didn't even buy it because it had so much politics and I first waited till it released and tried it before I made that decision. Even with the great work of many modders, it is still a hot mess and I won't be purchasing it (I have spent way too much money on being fooled by snake oil over the decades). I can't even bring myself to finish it (I am stuck at the start of Act 3) and because they have openly embraced it as it seems, I won't spend a dime on them, even if mods eventually repair every aspect of it. I consider having to repair their game from their virtual signaling, payment in full.

I wish there were more honest studios, they deserve the business, but it seems like every time I turn around, another studio has a Marxist flag being raised.

[Magick]

Either it's WOTSC's stipulations or Sweet Baby consultation. It doesn't feel like Larian at all to me.

WotC and Hasbro are particularly aggressive on this front. Still, I find it hard to believe Larian itself hasn't heavily infiltrated by activist devs over the past five years (if it's bad in Europe as it is in the US/Canada, and I've no reason to suspect it isn't). It's everywhere in games now.

Did Sweet Baby actually work on BG3, or are you just alluding to that style of creative-subversive activism in general?

They do have a lot of LGBT or supportive staff in the company. Shadowheart and the director she hooked up with during dev are literal lesbos. A ***** wrote a lot of the romance. Not sure how much Astarion's VA actually supports the virtue signalling now preaching.

Also Tencent owns a third of the company.. China is based but they're fully aware how this can be weaponised against the west.

[Xenich]

Well Disney isn't learning despite catastrophic financial repercussions. I doubt Larian will believe it's suffering any impact from feelings while it's drowning in revenue. However, if Sven watches wider industry trends he might realize the current absurdist take on Diversity isn't a long-term winner, and could well compromise a future release (that doesn't come with DnD's current built-in Theater Kid audience). I'm fairly sure he's smart enough to not use BG3's good fortune to bind himself to another third party's IP and influence going forward, so whatever they do next will be a Divinity title or something completely new that Larian will own. Beyond that it's all guesswork.

I also know that purging a studio of subversives, or somehow keeping them around while shutting them up, would be an ugly battle. And those elements will feel emboldened by BG3, and will push even harder to make the next game even more extreme. So if he's even inclined to resist (and I've no expectation that he is), it will be an internal and PR bloodbath. So don't get your hopes up. Being in the rare position of having the cache to do the right thing has never guaranteed one won't just do the wrong thing anyway.

Yeah, I get you. I know for me personally, if BG3 didn't have all the check marks (BG title due to nostalgia, D&D ruleset even though I am not fond of 5th edition, and Larians approach to mechanics), I would have never even bothered to play it (and there are a lot of games I find interesting, but move on from without even playing due to these narratives). I didn't even buy it because it had so much politics and I first waited till it released and tried it before I made that decision. Even with the great work of many modders, it is still a hot mess and I won't be purchasing it (I have spent way too much money on being fooled by snake oil over the decades). I can't even bring myself to finish it (I am stuck at the start of Act 3) and because they have openly embraced it as it seems, I won't spend a dime on them, even if mods eventually repair every aspect of it. I consider having to repair their game from their virtual signaling, payment in full.

I wish there were more honest studios, they deserve the business, but it seems like every time I turn around, another studio has a Marxist flag being raised.

I feel sorry for Karl Marx now. He wrote a book in 19 century (the first volume of Capital was written in 1867) on how government should prioritise citizens of their country, not business, and how it is fair, in his opinion, to divide the profits. He never said a word about ********, gays, lesbians. At first, American Cold War propaganda attributed him mandatory executions and prisons. Now this. But he was an economist, he counted money and nothing else.

Yeah, um... my knowledge and research into Marx seems to be at a direct conflict with your assessment of him being some honest guy (and I find a lot of western history on such topics to be nothing more than Zionist propaganda). Lets just say, he comes from a line of Rabbi's and his work is at the center of the Zionist movement to which heralds it. I find it odd that his work is trumpeted by the very groups that subscribe to the methodological means of collapsing a society through the utmost decadence and suffering in order to all of a sudden revert course and proclaim it is to bring about this utopian vision. Besides, what sort of history to his background do you claim? From my research, he was more of a rich boy from a rich family of Jewish lawyers who dabbled in some very interesting and disturbing hobbies and never really worked in the world he apparently attempted to speak for.

[Xenich]

I feel sorry for Karl Marx now. He wrote a book in 19 century (the first volume of Capital was written in 1867) on how government should prioritise citizens of their country, not business, and how it is fair, in his opinion, to divide the profits. He never said a word about ********, gays, lesbians. At first, American Cold War propaganda attributed him mandatory executions and prisons. Now this. But he was an economist, he counted money and nothing else.

Yeah, um... my knowledge and research into Marx seems to be at a direct conflict with your assessment of him being some honest guy (and I find a lot of western history on such topics to be nothing more than Zionist propaganda). Lets just say, he comes from a line of Rabbi's and his work is at the center of the Zionist movement to which heralds it. I find it odd that his work is trumpeted by the very groups that subscribe to the methodological means of collapsing a society through the utmost decadence and suffering in order to all of a sudden revert course and proclaim it is to bring about this utopian vision. Besides, what sort of history to his background do you claim? From my research, he was more of a rich boy from a rich family of Jewish lawyers who dabbled in some very interesting and disturbing hobbies and never really worked in the world he apparently attempted to speak for.

But this still does not negate the fact that in his writings he did not say anything about gays, ***** and lesbians.

I find it odd that his work is trumpeted by the very groups that...

I find it odd that terrorists from the middle east use american and european cars, weapons, explosive, tactical gear for their dids.

By your logic if Marks is guilty in modern woke agenda that use his scientific works, than europeans and americans is guilty that terrorists from the middle east use american and european cars, weapons, explosive, tactical gear for their dids.

These are very strange and dubious conclusions.

You make the mistake that I am of that side. *chuckle*

Most of Western establishment as we know it was coopted by Zionism in the early 1900's with the take over of the banking system and many elements of the government, some would argue much longer. All of these wars, Zionists interest. The US's involvement in WWI and WW2 was all part of a Zionist plan to secure the land area now known as Israel through the Balfour agreement (purchase from the British by the Rothchild). So, no I don't prescribe to the US being this bastion of freedom, I tend to agree with Patton, we supported the Communists who would eventually destroy us 50 years later (he was right). So, what you find odd about the US in the middle east, I see as nothing more than the same thing the Israel mossed did when they created Hamas in order to justify the cleansing of the rest of Israel. If you are truly interested in digging all the dots connect and it all goes back to Zionism.

So basically, I see your argument, and I agree there is nefarious actions made by the US throughout that history, but where we disagree is that they are on different sides. The U.S. is on the side of Zionism... the communists, and Marxism is a tool to achieve their goals. They are one of the same. That is the nature of this deception by getting people to argue for both sides while not realizing they are all tools of the same to keep people distracted.

Edit: Anyway, I don't want to derail a modding thread with some massive argument on the subject. If you truly want to argue this, start a thread in a more relevant forum and I would be happy to discuss the merits of the positions.

[Envergence]

>Click onto the No Alphabets thread to see what's new
>It's a debate about Karl Marx

Man, this thread's got it all.

[ArcaneLurker]

But this still does not negate the fact that in his writings he did not say anything about gays, ***** and lesbians.

This is true. It came later with Lenin & Trotsky, and perhaps others that influenced them.
The main purpose is to make use of groups that are all united by hatred for the status quo-- the underclass, the dysgenic freaks, the outcast deviants & delinquents, the racial & religious minorities, they all want to rip apart the status quo that puts them at the bottom or pushes them aside, and flip the hierarchy, and get a piece of the pie that **** promise.

Afrocentric Marxist-Leninism abandons the focus on Lower Class Whites, seeing that they're more resistant to the message, instead mapping Class Warfare on to Racial Warfare on a global scale.
Instead of the Bourgeoisie, White people & "Whiteness" is the enemy that must be slain to usher in a global utopia... the fanciful ideals are all crafted to manipulate & galvanise their targets into marching lockstep with their agendas.

Because **** are the authors, figureheads & funders of this movement, they hope to become the ones that are trusted to 'manage on behalf' of the people. "The means of production" is owned by the people on paper, in practicality the state, and Jewish elites own all the property, and nobody else has any rights to private property.

[MadRussian]

So I finally reached the end of Act 2 playing with No Alphabets for the first time, and I have a theory.
As a female, Aylin just GRATED. Both the substance and the delivery felt artificial and forced. She was supposed to be a larger-than-life celestial, but instead she came off as a CARDBOARD CUTOUT THAT SPEAKS IN CAPS. I just could not buy into her as a character, period end of story. She was just as immersion-breaking as Karlach's modern slang and manner of speech.

As a dude however, it suddenly all falls into place. Ser Aylin is actually larger-than-life and goofy as ****, and it feels approximately 9000 percent more natural. You could see that someone could actually form an attachment to him, rather than being attached to him because the script says so. So this makes me wonder: was Aylin originally written as a man by Larian? (I know that in the beginning the Nightsong was supposed to be a whole nother thing altogether, but still). I wouldn't be surprised that WOTC "consulted" them to *** things up after Aylin was written in, which resulted in Dame Aylin being such a completely out-of-step character.

Of course, Larian are faggy enough as is without needing consulting, but still.

[orinEsque]

So I finally reached the end of Act 2 playing with No Alphabets for the first time, and I have a theory.
As a female, Aylin just GRATED. Both the substance and the delivery felt artificial and forced. She was supposed to be a larger-than-life celestial, but instead she came off as a CARDBOARD CUTOUT THAT SPEAKS IN CAPS. I just could not buy into her as a character, period end of story. She was just as immersion-breaking as Karlach's modern slang and manner of speech.

As a dude however, it suddenly all falls into place. Ser Aylin is actually larger-than-life and goofy as ****, and it feels approximately 9000 percent more natural. You could see that someone could actually form an attachment to him, rather than being attached to him because the script says so. So this makes me wonder: was Aylin originally written as a man by Larian? (I know that in the beginning the Nightsong was supposed to be a whole nother thing altogether, but still). I wouldn't be surprised that WOTC "consulted" them to *** things up after Aylin was written in, which resulted in Dame Aylin being such a completely out-of-step character.

Of course, Larian are faggy enough as is without needing consulting, but still.

I have another theory: these writers write a man and serve them up to us woman because they're incapable of conceiving what a strong woman is meant to be like. Also notice in these so called lesbian relationships, one half is very obviously a man in every way except body and voice: Lakrissa, that Foundry boss woman etc.