ArcaneLurker wrote: β
February 23rd, 2024, 23:23
BobT wrote: β
February 23rd, 2024, 22:56
loregamer wrote: β
February 23rd, 2024, 22:43
Boys, shall we do a little bit of trolling and let Nexus know about this? We need to protect the wrongful use of assets without the explicit owner's permission, after all.
If it can be proven that she did so, yes.
It breaks our principles but at the same time it catching one of their own, proves how ******* stupid Nexus policies are.
Accelerate.
CD Project Red announced that people could use assets from their games for modding-- hence why you see Witcher 2/ 3 outfits for Skyrim, etc.
That's very uncommon and it was maybe meant with the best of intentions by them, but I still think no developer/owner/publisher should do this, or be praised or recognized for doing so, because it sets a precedent that they need to.
It is far preferable to keep up the charade of legal ambiguity and have all remain silent on the subject and continue to not give a ****. I realize my tone may make it sound like I'm joking, but I am really, really not.
loregamer wrote: β
February 23rd, 2024, 23:43
ArcaneLurker wrote: β
February 23rd, 2024, 23:23
BobT wrote: β
February 23rd, 2024, 22:56
If it can be proven that she did so, yes.
It breaks our principles but at the same time it catching one of their own, proves how ******* stupid Nexus policies are.
Accelerate.
CD Project Red announced that people could use assets from their games for modding-- hence why you see Witcher 2/ 3 outfits for Skyrim, etc.
Looks like you can port stuff their early titles freely, but from W3 and CP2077, you need to make a permission request on their forum. Wonder if Vessnelle did reach out.
This makes it even more ironic that she feels such ownership and offense at people using "her" hairs hahaha
Yeah, see, this **** right here should never be allowed to become the norm, and should be resisted at all costs. It is not something done with good intentions, but a way to assert control over modding.