
He got shot now he's in your Japslop #bars
The only reason I can come up with is that libs just love worshiping ******* and Tupac is like one of their deities or something. Some funny lore about his inclusion in Stranger than Heaven is that Snoop Dog is behind it. A guy who in the past has performed at Coachella with a Tupac hologram. Seems like Snoop has the scruples of a Jew and doesn't mind monetizing a dead friend.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2026, 19:20what's the reason libtards idolize a guy that died at like 24 because he was a ****** that did niggershit?
it's not even like he had 30 years of music to prop his name up or something
[edit]
lmao I didn't even know he raped a woman, ofc he did
That song he did that mashed up Joe Cocker's Woman to Woman with West Coast Poplock, Dance Floor, and Ain't No Sunshine was really catchy. It also had a memorable Mad Max-but-black video.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2026, 19:20what's the reason libtards idolize a guy that died at like 24 because he was a ****** that did niggershit?
it's not even like he had 30 years of music to prop his name up or something

It had a very fun splitscreen vs mode where each player has a bunch of NPC grunts that could be commanded.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2026, 22:02this game would be unable to be made today without offending like 85% of the populace somehow
![]()

I doubt he actually raped a woman, he was gay as hell. The rape thing was prolly made-up to give him some street cred.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2026, 19:20what's the reason libtards idolize a guy that died at like 24 because he was a ****** that did niggershit?
it's not even like he had 30 years of music to prop his name up or something
[edit]
lmao I didn't even know he raped a woman, ofc he did
the rape charges are sus tbf but he lived like a ****** and died like one. libcucks daydream of getting sodomised by ******* and project their disgusting fetish on everything.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2026, 19:20what's the reason libtards idolize a guy that died at like 24 because he was a ****** that did niggershit?
it's not even like he had 30 years of music to prop his name up or something
[edit]
lmao I didn't even know he raped a woman, ofc he did
Ahh the bastards! They were hiding this until late. This was looking pretty good right up until now.Acrux wrote: ↑ June 7th, 2026, 00:18
Valter wrote: ↑ June 7th, 2026, 15:06
Max settings - ~40FPS
Lowest settings (no shadows, render scale 50%, "quarter" textures, no AA) - ~50FPS
? ? ?
As others said, the rape was almost certainly made up for cred, he was 100% a down-low ***. He was Carlton if Carlton suddenly decided to get a gangsta makeover for clout.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2026, 19:20what's the reason libtards idolize a guy that died at like 24 because he was a ****** that did niggershit?
it's not even like he had 30 years of music to prop his name up or something
[edit]
lmao I didn't even know he raped a woman, ofc he did
asf wrote:weeb
It's important to know your enemyValter wrote: ↑ June 7th, 2026, 16:53Why do you guys know the intricate history behind hoodlum ******* and how gay they are?
asf wrote:weeb
you know too much about thisKillagain665 wrote: ↑ June 7th, 2026, 16:45I think tupac gave easy e hiv/aids and easy died from it quickly due to all the other std's he had and severe drug use. they murdered him for being the end of easy about a year and a half after his death. Down low brothers do each other dirty.
asf wrote:weeb
Like a lot of his ilk, I believe he was not fussy about which holes he would jam "muh dik" into.
asf wrote:weeb
Poorly aged shooter. Doesn't have the same issue that every other shooter between 2005 and 2013 had, most guys fall over after being shot once or twice
RDR1 is a lot more fun than the sequel and far, far less woke. It reflects more of a lolbertarian anti fed ideology, which is far more preferable than the communist ideals pushed in RDR2, and with more subtlety and nuance.
I should've mentioned that I've been watching a bunch of spaghetti westerns over the past week and that's why I want to check it out, not because I particularly care about the gameplay being greatnepbnhurj wrote: ↑ June 8th, 2026, 07:59Poorly aged shooter. Doesn't have the same issue that every other shooter between 2005 and 2013 had, most guys fall over after being shot once or twice
Going to start it soon, thanks for the very informative rundownBertram_Tung wrote: ↑ June 8th, 2026, 08:35RDR1 is a lot more fun than the sequel and far, far less woke. It reflects more of a lolbertarian anti fed ideology, which is far more preferable than the communist ideals pushed in RDR2, and with more subtlety and nuance.
The shooting is better too. There are ragdoll effects, and enemies react differently depending on where they're hit. If you shoot a guy in the leg he might crawl around and keep shooting at you. If you shoot a guy in both of his knees, he will stop crawling and keep shooting you until you put him down. They will react to specific limbs you shoot, unlike RDR2 where they are basically just bullet sponges with far less reactivity. It makes the combat feel much more dynamic. In that respect, it's basically the opposite of what the poster above me said. RDR2's gunplay actually feels more "dated" to me.
Overall, RDR1 is just more enjoyable to play. It's funnier, has a more interesting darker tone & atmosphere, the movement is snappier, it doesn't lecture you about modern woke ideology, and it doesn't constantly waste your time with slow, drawn-out animations for every mundane action the way RDR2 does.
Since you've been on a spaghetti western kick, it's worth noting that it channels a lot more of that kind of energy than RDR2 does, too.
asf wrote:weeb
Depending on how tolerant you are of mid-00s grafx, there was a game released not too long after the original Red Dead Revolver (not to be confused with Red Dead Redemption) called GUN that is quite similarmethoxetamine wrote: ↑ June 8th, 2026, 13:34I should've mentioned that I've been watching a bunch of spaghetti westerns over the past week and that's why I want to check it out, not because I particularly care about the gameplay being greatnepbnhurj wrote: ↑ June 8th, 2026, 07:59Poorly aged shooter. Doesn't have the same issue that every other shooter between 2005 and 2013 had, most guys fall over after being shot once or twice
Going to start it soon, thanks for the very informative rundownBertram_Tung wrote: ↑ June 8th, 2026, 08:35RDR1 is a lot more fun than the sequel and far, far less woke. It reflects more of a lolbertarian anti fed ideology, which is far more preferable than the communist ideals pushed in RDR2, and with more subtlety and nuance.
The shooting is better too. There are ragdoll effects, and enemies react differently depending on where they're hit. If you shoot a guy in the leg he might crawl around and keep shooting at you. If you shoot a guy in both of his knees, he will stop crawling and keep shooting you until you put him down. They will react to specific limbs you shoot, unlike RDR2 where they are basically just bullet sponges with far less reactivity. It makes the combat feel much more dynamic. In that respect, it's basically the opposite of what the poster above me said. RDR2's gunplay actually feels more "dated" to me.
Overall, RDR1 is just more enjoyable to play. It's funnier, has a more interesting darker tone & atmosphere, the movement is snappier, it doesn't lecture you about modern woke ideology, and it doesn't constantly waste your time with slow, drawn-out animations for every mundane action the way RDR2 does.
Since you've been on a spaghetti western kick, it's worth noting that it channels a lot more of that kind of energy than RDR2 does, too.![]()