This dude was breaking ToS by funneling his Nexus subscribers to his paid-mod site(s), through his twitter account. I've seen it where modders release a mod on Nexus, then advertise different versions of those mods (on twitter) locked behind a subscription or fee-based paywall. I get that (some) modders want to get paid for their time, but **** that - as soon as you start taking money from people, the consumer mentality kicks in and subscribers feel entitled to a lot more than your mod. Even worse, they might turn into para-social parasites.
We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
Mod seethe thread (formerly Nexus seethe thread)
a ***** would naturally be into tortured and purposely ugly things
I don't like it morally but I don't see any reason modders shouldn't be allowed to make money off of their mods if they choose to. If people want to pay for content they think is worth it, so be it. No matter what, it's all just extra to a game.campersinc wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 03:26This dude was breaking ToS by funneling his Nexus subscribers to his paid-mod site(s), through his twitter account. I've seen it where modders release a mod on Nexus, then advertise different versions of those mods (on twitter) locked behind a subscription or fee-based paywall. I get that (some) modders want to get paid for their time, but **** that - as soon as you start taking money from people, the consumer mentality kicks in and subscribers feel entitled to a lot more than your mod. Even worse, they might turn into para-social parasites.
-
rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 45458
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
developers/publishers really dislike when people charge for mods and nexusmods doesn't want to even be tangentially associated with it
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Makes sense.rusty_shackleford wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48developers/publishers really dislike when people charge for mods and nexusmods doesn't want to even be tangentially associated with it
**** payment, mods must be free, I've had enough of so many entitled ***** putting price tags and hiding content behind paywall, and it's not even DLC sized. or users posting some cool looking armor or weapons and you discover "ummmm is a pRiVaTe mod i cOmMiSsiONeD, so **** you <3" comment. worse than that, many of said mods get deleted without a trace or explanation, or get deleted because mod author got into a fight with (insert some ****'s name here), so **** thatBreathe wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48I don't like it morally but I don't see any reason modders shouldn't be allowed to make money off of their mods if they choose to. If people want to pay for content they think is worth it, so be it. No matter what, it's all just extra to a game.
It's good for them to be deleted foreverCheesusCrust wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 05:25**** payment, mods must be free, I've had enough of so many entitled ***** putting price tags and hiding content behind paywall, and it's not even DLC sized. or users posting some cool looking armor or weapons and you discover "ummmm is a pRiVaTe mod i cOmMiSsiONeD, so **** you <3" comment. worse than that, many of said mods get deleted without a trace or explanation, or get deleted because mod author got into a fight with (insert some ****'s name here), so **** thatBreathe wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48I don't like it morally but I don't see any reason modders shouldn't be allowed to make money off of their mods if they choose to. If people want to pay for content they think is worth it, so be it. No matter what, it's all just extra to a game.
VAE VICTIS
"Hon" has been for many years a vicious ***** insult for a hideous obvious man-in-a-dress, because those types would post disgusting selfies on reddit or tumblr with their stubble and Norwood and the hivemind/bots would reply with some North Korea-tier propaganda like "You look so much healthier and happier now that you're true to yourself, honey".orinEsque wrote: β March 30th, 2026, 05:55We all have eyes, so do they.
"So stunning and brave!"
translation: must take a lot of courage to walk out of your house looking that ugly.
-
logincrash
- The Music Man
- Posts: 6040
- Joined: Sep 3, '23
- Location: Niger
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
It's fine to make a tip-jar, but putting mods behind paywall is gay.Breathe wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48I don't like it morally but I don't see any reason modders shouldn't be allowed to make money off of their mods if they choose to. If people want to pay for content they think is worth it, so be it. No matter what, it's all just extra to a game.campersinc wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 03:26This dude was breaking ToS by funneling his Nexus subscribers to his paid-mod site(s), through his twitter account. I've seen it where modders release a mod on Nexus, then advertise different versions of those mods (on twitter) locked behind a subscription or fee-based paywall. I get that (some) modders want to get paid for their time, but **** that - as soon as you start taking money from people, the consumer mentality kicks in and subscribers feel entitled to a lot more than your mod. Even worse, they might turn into para-social parasites.
"Oh, it all makes sense now, brother."
Nothing to do with enslaving modders its just that if you start using mods you'll realize that a lot aren't very good and even when they're good you can run into incompatibilities or just not liking certain mods, so you're installing and uninstalling 90%+ of mods. Now imagine that but you have to pay for said mods.
Last edited by Sinfield on March 31st, 2026, 08:29, edited 1 time in total.
When i make a passion project... like NA for example... charging people for it takes the fun out of it.logincrash wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 06:14It's fine to make a tip-jar, but putting mods behind paywall is gay.Breathe wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48I don't like it morally but I don't see any reason modders shouldn't be allowed to make money off of their mods if they choose to. If people want to pay for content they think is worth it, so be it. No matter what, it's all just extra to a game.campersinc wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 03:26
This dude was breaking ToS by funneling his Nexus subscribers to his paid-mod site(s), through his twitter account. I've seen it where modders release a mod on Nexus, then advertise different versions of those mods (on twitter) locked behind a subscription or fee-based paywall. I get that (some) modders want to get paid for their time, but **** that - as soon as you start taking money from people, the consumer mentality kicks in and subscribers feel entitled to a lot more than your mod. Even worse, they might turn into para-social parasites.
But if someone wanted me to make them a waifu customised to their taste. I would charge def charge them.
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
I never look at nexus media section. Filled with ****** and their ugly MCs
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
-
logincrash
- The Music Man
- Posts: 6040
- Joined: Sep 3, '23
- Location: Niger
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
I used to browse the Dragon Age Origins media section and choose the most intricately cringeworthy pieces to shock anons on /v/ with.orinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 12:30I never look at nexus media section. Filled with ****** and their ugly MCs
It's incredible how much abject ugliness there is that people post proudly, completely convinced that they're sharing something beautiful.
Last edited by logincrash on March 31st, 2026, 12:36, edited 1 time in total.
"Oh, it all makes sense now, brother."
-
logincrash
- The Music Man
- Posts: 6040
- Joined: Sep 3, '23
- Location: Niger
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
Also, decided to take a loot at the aforementioned media section for good old times' sake.
******, don't give me the toggle to disable it if it's mandatory.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Oh, it all makes sense now, brother."
Looks like EBR managed to be featured on motm. Someplace somewhere a ****** is complaining about a white male supremacist paying nexus to put him on motm.


Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
Except Bugthesda, that started a cash shop for them, the ******* slime.rusty_shackleford wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48developers/publishers really dislike when people charge for mods and nexusmods doesn't want to even be tangentially associated with it
Never a penny more. Oblivion was my last purchase.
You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Meanwhile, made by either a guy or a woman before the ***** times, and in Oblivion, no less (where it's hard AF to make attractive faces).orinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 12:30I never look at nexus media section. Filled with ****** and their ugly MCs

You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Nah this was an image from one of Arideyya's modsorinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 12:30I never look at nexus media section. Filled with ****** and their ugly MCs
"I'm so straight I could suck a dick and it wouldn't be gay."
Make me a big titty altmer trad wife, I'll pay you 5 shekelsorinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 09:22When i make a passion project... like NA for example... charging people for it takes the fun out of it.logincrash wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 06:14It's fine to make a tip-jar, but putting mods behind paywall is gay.Breathe wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48
I don't like it morally but I don't see any reason modders shouldn't be allowed to make money off of their mods if they choose to. If people want to pay for content they think is worth it, so be it. No matter what, it's all just extra to a game.
But if someone wanted me to make them a waifu customised to their taste. I would charge def charge them.
"I'm so straight I could suck a dick and it wouldn't be gay."
Or more likely, want their cut. The journo (they're all the same) likely hasn't researched it properly.rusty_shackleford wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 04:48developers/publishers really dislike when people charge for mods and nexusmods doesn't want to even be tangentially associated with it
From what I can tell, Nexus doesn't like modders soliciting paid work ON nexus, so they ban it via their ToS (fair enough).
So of course they'd also ban anyone just linking to a twitter (from Nexus) which then solicits paid work, as otherwise it would be too easy of a workaround lol.
But IF they banned for something that wasn't linked or mentioned on Nexus at all, then that would be BS. But I don't think that happened there.
As to payment for mods, it depends. If the work is done at the MODDER'S initiative, then they shouldn't be charging money, if they decide to share it. Else just keep it to themselves. General mods shouldn't be paywalled.
But if some guy is wanting some catgirl waifu or a specific armor / customised look JUST for himself, then I can't see anything wrong with the modder asking for a commission payment there, since I can't imagine they'd want to use a ton of their time for something that is being demanded by, and will only be used by that 1 person, and they wouldn't even be doing it, otherwise.
When it comes to modding on commission, you have to ask: what is a modders time worth? I'm in the US, there's just no ******* way I'd spend 12 hours in blender, skald, and/or xml files, making edits (and testing for bugs), for less that $100. Except, that's an insane asking price for a mod. The only way it works is if you sell a mod, or a mod subscription, to 20 people for $5 each. The math can't math. As soon as modding becomes more like work, again, you need to ask yourself: how much is your time worth? And too, know that buyers are going to have the expectation of satisfaction, which can easily mean extra work revisiting or refining the mod. So, as I said before: '**** that.'BobT wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 16:11As to payment for mods, it depends. If the work is done at the MODDER'S initiative, then they shouldn't be charging money, if they decide to share it. Else just keep it to themselves. General mods shouldn't be paywalled.
But if some guy is wanting some catgirl waifu or a specific armor / customised look JUST for himself, then I can't see anything wrong with the modder asking for a commission payment there, since I can't imagine they'd want to use a ton of their time for something that is being demanded by, and will only be used by that 1 person, and they wouldn't even be doing it, otherwise.
Maybe it works like gold farmers in mmos? A couple usd is a lot of money when converted to banana currency.campersinc wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 18:51When it comes to modding on commission, you have to ask: what is a modders time worth? I'm in the US, there's just no ******* way I'd spend 12 hours in blender, skald, and/or xml files, making edits (and testing for bugs), for less that $100. Except, that's an insane asking price for a mod. The only way it works is if you sell a mod, or a mod subscription, to 20 people for $5 each. The math can't math. As soon as modding becomes more like work, again, you need to ask yourself: how much is your time worth? And too, know that buyers are going to have the expectation of satisfaction, which can easily mean extra work revisiting or refining the mod. So, as I said before: '**** that.'BobT wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 16:11As to payment for mods, it depends. If the work is done at the MODDER'S initiative, then they shouldn't be charging money, if they decide to share it. Else just keep it to themselves. General mods shouldn't be paywalled.
But if some guy is wanting some catgirl waifu or a specific armor / customised look JUST for himself, then I can't see anything wrong with the modder asking for a commission payment there, since I can't imagine they'd want to use a ton of their time for something that is being demanded by, and will only be used by that 1 person, and they wouldn't even be doing it, otherwise.
Doesn't the Nexus mentally ill ******* ban for iNtEnTiOnS? Like, those morons were acting like thought police, not just banning for "wrong" motives, but actually deciding for the mod author what those motives were without even asking.orinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 12:41Looks like EBR managed to be featured on motm. Someplace somewhere a ****** is complaining about a white male supremacist paying nexus to put him on motm.
![]()
They'll only take it down if the mod breaks their ToS, or if a link you posted has content or more links that break their ToS.... For now.Trickster wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:29Doesn't the Nexus mentally ill ******* ban for iNtEnTiOnS? Like, those morons were acting like thought police, not just banning for "wrong" motives, but actually deciding for the mod author what those motives were without even asking.orinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 12:41Looks like EBR managed to be featured on motm. Someplace somewhere a ****** is complaining about a white male supremacist paying nexus to put him on motm.
![]()
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
That's good. Because it used to be: 'Since we "know better" what you actually meant, and it doesn't align with our made-up rules, which are governed by unstated criteria existing only in our own heads, we can do whatever we want and ban you on a total whim while hiding behind woke buzzwords".orinEsque wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:42They'll only take it down if the mod breaks their ToS, or if a link you posted has content or more links that break their ToS.... For now.Trickster wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:29Doesn't the Nexus mentally ill ******* ban for iNtEnTiOnS? Like, those morons were acting like thought police, not just banning for "wrong" motives, but actually deciding for the mod author what those motives were without even asking.orinEsque wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 12:41Looks like EBR managed to be featured on motm. Someplace somewhere a ****** is complaining about a white male supremacist paying nexus to put him on motm.
![]()
It was a deeply unprofessional power-tripping and reddit like circus.
This is why you only mod for the love of the game (modding in this case, not an actual game).campersinc wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 18:51When it comes to modding on commission, you have to ask: what is a modders time worth? I'm in the US, there's just no ******* way I'd spend 12 hours in blender, skald, and/or xml files, making edits (and testing for bugs), for less that $100. Except, that's an insane asking price for a mod. The only way it works is if you sell a mod, or a mod subscription, to 20 people for $5 each. The math can't math. As soon as modding becomes more like work, again, you need to ask yourself: how much is your time worth? And too, know that buyers are going to have the expectation of satisfaction, which can easily mean extra work revisiting or refining the mod. So, as I said before: '**** that.'BobT wrote: β March 31st, 2026, 16:11As to payment for mods, it depends. If the work is done at the MODDER'S initiative, then they shouldn't be charging money, if they decide to share it. Else just keep it to themselves. General mods shouldn't be paywalled.
But if some guy is wanting some catgirl waifu or a specific armor / customised look JUST for himself, then I can't see anything wrong with the modder asking for a commission payment there, since I can't imagine they'd want to use a ton of their time for something that is being demanded by, and will only be used by that 1 person, and they wouldn't even be doing it, otherwise.
It's a hobby, not a job.
My Mods:
Kenshi:
viewtopic.php?t=3219-under-armour-edits-1-0-kenshi - Under Armour Edits
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3262-face-expansion-1-0-kenshi - Face Expansion
Kenshi:
viewtopic.php?t=3219-under-armour-edits-1-0-kenshi - Under Armour Edits
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3262-face-expansion-1-0-kenshi - Face Expansion
The only reason I can fathom is that taking that attitude and (attempting to) appeasing ********, didn't work out profitable.Trickster wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:52That's good. Because it used to be: 'Since we "know better" what you actually meant, and it doesn't align with our made-up rules, which are governed by unstated criteria existing only in our own heads, we can do whatever we want and ban you on a total whim while hiding behind woke buzzwords".orinEsque wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:42They'll only take it down if the mod breaks their ToS, or if a link you posted has content or more links that break their ToS.... For now.Trickster wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:29
Doesn't the Nexus mentally ill ******* ban for iNtEnTiOnS? Like, those morons were acting like thought police, not just banning for "wrong" motives, but actually deciding for the mod author what those motives were without even asking.
It was a deeply unprofessional power-tripping and reddit like circus.
If I ran a website, that's how I'd moderate. I wouldn't couch it in fluffy nuspeak, though. I'd just ban people because I didn't like them. I'd moderate based on "vibe", as you kids put it.Trickster wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:52That's good. Because it used to be: 'Since we "know better" what you actually meant, and it doesn't align with our made-up rules, which are governed by unstated criteria existing only in our own heads, we can do whatever we want and ban you on a total whim while hiding behind woke buzzwords".orinEsque wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:42They'll only take it down if the mod breaks their ToS, or if a link you posted has content or more links that break their ToS.... For now.Trickster wrote: β April 1st, 2026, 09:29
Doesn't the Nexus mentally ill ******* ban for iNtEnTiOnS? Like, those morons were acting like thought police, not just banning for "wrong" motives, but actually deciding for the mod author what those motives were without even asking.
It was a deeply unprofessional power-tripping and reddit like circus.
