Female developers were the worst thing to happen to gaming

[Norfleet]

Imagine a future world so awful that Gen Z is going to be reminiscent of an era where being lectured by ****** **** and their niggercattle about how you should ************* for being white will be a better time.

Apparently the newer generations have it so bad they're reminiscent of eras they never personally experienced, because the present is now so bad that not only is it naturally worse on net (unavoidable), but also worse in every specific way they can see as well. Because in the past, things got worse on net, but improved in specific areas. But today, the decline is now so acute and pronounced that it cannot even produce local improvement. Everything is just worse.

My grandparents and father very specifically liked the music and movies that existed when they were young and did not care too much for the modernity I enjoyed. We are all creatures of our environment.

So do my kids. They like the music and movies that existed when I was young, too, and do not care for the bulk of modern slop.

How come some people like music that was made decades if not centuries before they were born?

Because they were better, obviously.

It's quite easy to understand: In old timey when there was little to nothing, it was easier to pump from the well of goodness (technically: non-awfulness). As the well becomes increasingly pumped dry, it requires more and more effort to produce less and less quality product. This applies to everything, whether it's oil, science, or creativity. The only difference between oil and creativity is that is creativity doesn't get used up, so the old stuff is still around, as a clear example of how it was simply better in the past.

[maidenhaver]

There was too much jewywood investor and government money in vidya, last decade. Publicly traded companies also collect lazy scum faster than a private studio.

The gamer is the first cybernetic man. He has advanced beyond nations and now holds the world in his hands. The companies who make his games aren't gamers or even hobbyists, they're just cloutfagging fatties with jobs they thought were bulletproof. The money will leave them behind, and the ****** will make every game. They will scrub toilets and move in with dumb ******* for drugs.

[Fox1]

Gaming peaked when developers were mostly white, MGTOW fantasy nerds.

Maybe the problem isn't women per we, but feminist brainwashed ***** taught to act like men and destroy male spaces. If a woman is normal and feminine the result wouldn't be the same

In any job where a woman is introduced, the men working there will alter their words and actions to try and have sex with her, no matter how small the chances actually are.

So it doesn't really matter what the woman says or does.

I hate to admit how accurate this is. It sucks some guys always have to be simps and **** where they eat

[Roguey]

The golden age is always when you specifically were a child/teenager/young adult.

That's because things only ever get worse, as net entropy must always increase. Therefore, the "best" era is the earliest era in which you were forming and processing things. From that point on, everything is downhill as things can only get worse.

I'd say a lot of entertainment and music improved from the 70s-00s from what existed before myself. From the perspective of a very old person, from the early 20th century, things got worse.

Once again: hogwash.
How come some people like music that was made decades if not centuries before they were born? What about liking *some* of the modern music? I repeat myself once again - this is postmodernist ******** that is ultimately aimed at eroding any arguments against "the current thing", because "that's just your opinion bro" and "you just heard/saw it in your teens".

In addition, what you just said is an anecdotal evidence fallacy. The fact (or a hypothetical) that a few people did in fact prefer the music they have heard at a certain age does not mean that it's a universal rule. By the same measure I can say "Rusty is a fed because all forum admins are feds" and conjure up an anecdotal example of it being so.

It's much easier for a young person to like Older Thing than it is for an older person to like Newer Thing.

[rusty_shackleford]

summarize this thread in four words or less

[orinEsque]

summarize this thread in four words or less

foids bad.

[J1M]

summarize this thread in four words or less

Roguey is always wrong.

[rusty_shackleford]

summarize this thread in four words or less

Roguey is always wrong.

@Roguey is this true?

[Kalarion]

summarize this thread in four words or less

Roguey is always wrong.

Possible corrections: Rouge is Fake News. Rouge is always malicious. Rouge is a liar. Rouge hates the truth.

So many to choose from!

[Roguey]

A father, son, and older/younger brother are the closest things possible to another you and yet none of these people will ever have the exact same taste. My brother is eight years younger than I am, we grew up in the same house, and yet his tastes diverge from mine. He has a greater fondness for Current Year Slop, he does not particularly care for quite a few of the the things I loved when I was younger and continue to like. What a difference even eight years make.

[Segata]

Apparently the newer generations have it so bad they're reminiscent of eras they never personally experienced, because the present is now so bad that not only is it naturally worse on net (unavoidable), but also worse in every specific way they can see as well. Because in the past, things got worse on net, but improved in specific areas. But today, the decline is now so acute and pronounced that it cannot even produce local improvement. Everything is just worse.

I've seen plenty of zooms reminisce fondly the "good times of 2011-2016"

https://nitter.net/OldInternetFeel/stat ... 36274266#m