Knight's Path — Low fantasy action RPG

[RangerBoo]

Most of the "people" angry at this game are child molesting ******* who are upset that one game out of hundreds isn't being catered to them. The thought that a game is being made for straight men is unfathomable to the homosexual mind.

[RangerBoo]

I'll like to point out the entitlement of ******* and women in recent years. For the past ten years every single indie, AA, and AAA game has to have a gay or ***** character/s, gay romance, and at least one gay or ***** quest. Gamers whose majority are straight white men are sick of this ****. Gen Z and Gen Alpha are the most homophobic generations since the 50's. They have just about had it with *******. According to studies, young straight men seeing two men kiss is no different to them then seeing maggots eat a half rotten corpse. Even in games with optional gay romances only a single digit percent have their character go into a same sex relationship. Straight men are tired of ******* and women forcing this **** down their throats. Then here comes one studio that promised to make a game for straight men and not include gay **** in the game and ******* and women lose their goddamn minds. How dare you not cater to them! The past ten years games have been made to cater to them and their vanity but the thought of one game not being made for them is the equivalent of seeing someone run over their cat. The entitlement of these people is utterly sickening.

[Norfleet]

but the thought of one game not being made for them is the equivalent of seeing someone run over their cat. The entitlement of these people is utterly sickening.

And they weren't going to buy those games either way, which is why wokeslop flops.

[RangerBoo]

but the thought of one game not being made for them is the equivalent of seeing someone run over their cat. The entitlement of these people is utterly sickening.

And they weren't going to buy those games either way, which is why wokeslop flops.

Again, it is all about power and control. These freaks want to lord over you and control all aspects of your life. What you say, what you consume, what you enjoy playing in your free time. To think they have the gall to call the rest of us "fascists". You are right that these games are going to flop but these degenerate freaks of nature don't care. What they care about is that there is no alternatives for you to escape to.

[Norfleet]

Again, it is all about power and control. These freaks want to lord over you and control all aspects of your life. What you say, what you consume, what you enjoy playing in your free time. To think they have the gall to call the rest of us "fascists". You are right that these games are going to flop but these degenerate freaks of nature don't care. What they care about is that there is no alternatives for you to escape to.

There are always alternatives, since there are enough games for anyone to play even if no new games are ever made again.

[RangerBoo]

Again, it is all about power and control. These freaks want to lord over you and control all aspects of your life. What you say, what you consume, what you enjoy playing in your free time. To think they have the gall to call the rest of us "fascists". You are right that these games are going to flop but these degenerate freaks of nature don't care. What they care about is that there is no alternatives for you to escape to.

There are always alternatives, since there are enough games for anyone to play even if no new games are ever made again.

For now. I've had many leftists go mask off and tell me that the moment Trump is out of office that they will be electing socialists leaders who will string up all straight, white conservatives from lamp posts, send gay and minority conservatives to correction camps, and destroy all media from the past that they deem "problematic" in order to fight "wrong think". Basically these leftist are advocating for Khmer Rouge "Year Zero". Again, the leftist must be crushed from every single industry.

[Norfleet]

For now. I've had many leftists go mask off and tell me that the moment Trump is out of office that they will be electing socialists leaders who will string up all straight, white conservatives from lamp posts, send gay and minority conservatives to correction camps, and destroy all media from the past that they deem "problematic" in order to fight "wrong think".

Honestly, I hope they do. I tire of the mincing legalism and back and forth. If a fight is what they want, let it happen. If I can close out my life in an actual fight, I'm all for it.

[Algol]

It's just strange behavior. I'm unsure of whether or not they are ****** off because they can't gape a dude in a medieval simulator (plus mutant snails) or it's just a carefully-selected bitching point to somehow "expose" the dev as a homophobic whitemang.

But let's just say it's the former... complaining about this is bizarre. Do people really immerse themselves in these sorts of moments in rpgs? It's not like we are able to simulate cocksucking, ***-*******, anal-rimming and elbow-deep fisting gong-fu just yet (but hey, VR tech might have fuckable peripherals down the line... invest now!)

But yeah, I thought gayfolx were sexually active on a massive level, sometimes on a weekly basis... why do they need digital nerd smut?

[Stack of Turtles]

It's just strange behavior. I'm unsure of whether or not they are ****** off because they can't gape a dude in a medieval simulator (plus mutant snails) or it's just a carefully-selected bitching point to somehow "expose" the dev as a homophobic whitemang.

But let's just say it's the former... complaining about this is bizarre. Do people really immerse themselves in these sorts of moments in rpgs? It's not like we are able to simulate cocksucking, ***-*******, anal-rimming and elbow-deep fisting gong-fu just yet (but hey, VR tech might have fuckable peripherals down the line... invest now!)

But yeah, I thought gayfolx were sexually active on a massive level, sometimes on a weekly basis... why do they need digital nerd smut?

I don't think any of these people are actually gay, anyway, just women and autogynephiles being performative. Gays don't actually play video games because they're a distraction from ****.

[RangerBoo]

It's just strange behavior. I'm unsure of whether or not they are ****** off because they can't gape a dude in a medieval simulator (plus mutant snails) or it's just a carefully-selected bitching point to somehow "expose" the dev as a homophobic whitemang.

But let's just say it's the former... complaining about this is bizarre. Do people really immerse themselves in these sorts of moments in rpgs? It's not like we are able to simulate cocksucking, ***-*******, anal-rimming and elbow-deep fisting gong-fu just yet (but hey, VR tech might have fuckable peripherals down the line... invest now!)

But yeah, I thought gayfolx were sexually active on a massive level, sometimes on a weekly basis... why do they need digital nerd smut?

Because these freaks get off on grossing other people out and knowing that they can do nothing about it. People so much as voice displeasure at gay and ****** **** they will lose their job and livelihood. It is one of the reasons why they hate ModHQ because the site hosts mods that allow you to mod out LGBTQ **** in games. Everything is about power and control for these freaks. Sure, they themselves don't play video games but they will make **** sure that you will watch the gay men have anal sex with each other and you will like it!

[Algol]

It's just strange behavior. I'm unsure of whether or not they are ****** off because they can't gape a dude in a medieval simulator (plus mutant snails) or it's just a carefully-selected bitching point to somehow "expose" the dev as a homophobic whitemang.

But let's just say it's the former... complaining about this is bizarre. Do people really immerse themselves in these sorts of moments in rpgs? It's not like we are able to simulate cocksucking, ***-*******, anal-rimming and elbow-deep fisting gong-fu just yet (but hey, VR tech might have fuckable peripherals down the line... invest now!)

But yeah, I thought gayfolx were sexually active on a massive level, sometimes on a weekly basis... why do they need digital nerd smut?

I don't think any of these people are actually gay, anyway, just women and autogynephiles being performative. Gays don't actually play video games because they're a distraction from ****.

Seemed to be a few people ****** off because there's only going to be a bint you can romance in the game. Since you only play as a man, this means no homosex possibility. Tard-rage ensues.

I'm just wondering how many fuckers on this planet wake another day for reasons pertaining to watching digital gay sex in their "low fantasy" medieval ***-beat simulator. Apparently it is a lust that is subterannean in its darkness.

[Stack of Turtles]

It's just strange behavior. I'm unsure of whether or not they are ****** off because they can't gape a dude in a medieval simulator (plus mutant snails) or it's just a carefully-selected bitching point to somehow "expose" the dev as a homophobic whitemang.

But let's just say it's the former... complaining about this is bizarre. Do people really immerse themselves in these sorts of moments in rpgs? It's not like we are able to simulate cocksucking, ***-*******, anal-rimming and elbow-deep fisting gong-fu just yet (but hey, VR tech might have fuckable peripherals down the line... invest now!)

But yeah, I thought gayfolx were sexually active on a massive level, sometimes on a weekly basis... why do they need digital nerd smut?

I don't think any of these people are actually gay, anyway, just women and autogynephiles being performative. Gays don't actually play video games because they're a distraction from ****.

Seemed to be a few people ****** off because there's only going to be a bint you can romance in the game. Since you only play as a man, this means no homosex possibility. Tard-rage ensues.

I'm just wondering how many fuckers on this planet wake another day for reasons pertaining to watching digital gay sex in their "low fantasy" medieval ***-beat simulator. Apparently it is a lust that is subterannean in its darkness.

Some women, not gays, absolutely do play video games solely for the gay romance options. They don't like video games, they just want to watch their dolls ****.

(To be clear, there probably are some gays but since they're a tiny minority of a tiny minority, the women who do it are far more prevalent.)

[RangerBoo]

I don't think any of these people are actually gay, anyway, just women and autogynephiles being performative. Gays don't actually play video games because they're a distraction from ****.

Seemed to be a few people ****** off because there's only going to be a bint you can romance in the game. Since you only play as a man, this means no homosex possibility. Tard-rage ensues.

I'm just wondering how many fuckers on this planet wake another day for reasons pertaining to watching digital gay sex in their "low fantasy" medieval ***-beat simulator. Apparently it is a lust that is subterannean in its darkness.

Some women, not gays, absolutely do play video games solely for the gay romance options. They don't like video games, they just want to watch their dolls ****.

(To be clear, there probably are some gays but since they're a tiny minority of a tiny minority, the women who do it are far more prevalent.)

Well... yeah! Most gays I've come across don't really care about this ****. The ones that do are a very tiny minority and are hated by the other members of the gay community for being obnoxious faeries as they are called. Women, especially Jewish and white liberal women, are the biggest pushers of LGBTQ content in entertainment.

GwW-w6xXIAA4yrL.png

[Luckmann]

I dont see why Rightists should oppose the spread of AI into the "Art" world. Its some of the most disgusting leftoid latrine in the world....Its good if it gets crushed by AI.

Rightoids are nearly as mongoloidal as leftards, and twice as short-sighted. The fact that you have ceded the creative fields to dregs doesn't mean that the rest of us have to. It's like saying that you shouldn't fight cancer just because smokers are *******. Completely ********.

I dont see why Rightists should oppose the spread of AI into the "Art" world. Its some of the most disgusting leftoid latrine in the world....Its good if it gets crushed by AI.

Most artists are leftist because of overwhelming propaganda. I prefer human artists who can be swayed over machines which can be designed from the ground up to exclude certain ideas.

You're trading a temporary problem for a much stickier one. Truths will always bubble out of human creativity eventually (even in spite of the artist) because humans are organisms which are a part of nature, and you can only deny nature for so long before the consequences destroy you. The problem is self-correcting: even the most brainwashed humans die eventually, mostly without reproducing, and their worldview is overturned as its failures become too obvious to cover up. But a machine has no reality check. It will endlessly output whatever boneheaded ideology was programmed into it with until the end of time. I'm not eager to replace the natural system with a machine like that.

Word. Anyone that is willing to outsource fundamental aspects of humanity based on what "le side xD" they or their enemies are on or whatever ******* team jersey they happen to be wearing right now only betray that they don't really have any ideals or principles, but are merely reactively supporting whatever their perceived enemies are opposing at any one time.

I know about them from the medieval manuscripts as being symbolic of... one of the Sins, of course. That said... not sure it still qualifies as low fantasy.

In all seriousness; the giant snails thing is obviously a gag on the medieval manuscripts and whatnot, but more to the point, what constitutes "low fantasy" as compared to "high fantasy" is usually the degree of presence of or impact of magic specifically. "Low" fantasy is still fantasy, and one of the most common things to muck about with is the wildlife and races and flora and locales and whatnot.

You can go pretty fantastical and still be well within the limits of the lower end of fantasy, you just can't be slinging fireballs around and should generally agree to the laws of physics and whatnot. Even something that is clearly based in fables like Redwall can be considered "low fantasy".

[Hyborian]

Demos these days are basically = asking people to do beta test for free, which is, well, beta so nope.

No. Thats what a 1.0 release is nowadays.

"1.0" release nowadays is charging people to do QA for them, which used to be a fulltime job 20 years ago. I think QA jobs are still a thing inside AAA studios, but they tend to be ineffective because those jobs are now outsourced to India or wherever that has an average IQ of 80.

I dont see why Rightists should oppose the spread of AI into the "Art" world. Its some of the most disgusting leftoid latrine in the world....Its good if it gets crushed by AI.

This "own da lib" meme has really gone too far and it's time to stop now.

******.

[LemonDemonGirl]

Gen Z and Gen Alpha are the most homophobic generations since the 50's. They have just about had it with *******.

I'm 26 and I can't ******* stand them. Never have.

According to studies, young straight men seeing two men kiss is no different to them then seeing maggots eat a half rotten corpse.

I'll say it again. Maggots are a part of nature and are at LEAST being useful by helping something decompose faster.

[rusty_shackleford]

The people making the ****** knight game seem rather upset about how popular this small indie game is

[rusty_shackleford]

libtards don't know things, they just say stuff they think is real

https://www.gamingbible.com/news/knight ... 8-20260123

It seems as though, despite aims to be “historically accurate”, Knight’s Path’s female characters do not follow this formula.

But I guess women just have false eyelashes, blush and winged eyeliner like that naturally, huh?

NO WOMEN EVER WORE MAKEUP EVER BEFORE THE MODERN PERIOD!!!!!!!!

[Acrux]

libtards don't know things, they just say stuff they think is real

https://www.gamingbible.com/news/knight ... 8-20260123

It seems as though, despite aims to be “historically accurate”, Knight’s Path’s female characters do not follow this formula.

But I guess women just have false eyelashes, blush and winged eyeliner like that naturally, huh?

NO WOMEN EVER WORE MAKEUP EVER BEFORE THE MODERN PERIOD!!!!!!!!

Well, I wouldn't expect libtards to have ever read the Bible.

[Algol]

The people making the ****** knight game seem rather upset about how popular this small indie game is

Culture war nonsense aside, this is just extremely unprofessional behavior by a gamedev studio in general.

[rusty_shackleford]

The people making the ****** knight game seem rather upset about how popular this small indie game is

Culture war nonsense aside, this is just extremely unprofessional behavior by a gamedev studio in general.

When your wishlists are as low as theirs are, you do anything to get some attention

[Norfleet]

Most artists are leftist because of overwhelming propaganda. I prefer human artists who can be swayed over machines which can be designed from the ground up to exclude certain ideas.

It's just a machine. Machines can be swayed, too. You can always just run your own botslop generator and exclude whatever you don't care for. Ultimately, though, it's harder to exclude ideas from a machine than it is to do the same on a human artist. See: The bot constantly doing things its creators didn't want it to do, and you can't stop it from doing so by threatening it with a good beating.

You're trading a temporary problem for a much stickier one. Truths will always bubble out of human creativity eventually (even in spite of the artist) because humans are organisms which are a part of nature, and you can only deny nature for so long before the consequences destroy you.

You say this like botslop is somehow eliminating "human creativity". The bot does not create slop on its own. Someone has to tell it to do that. The creative process is still there, you're just removing the meatsack that produces it. The machine replaces the worker, not the designer.

Of course, botslop is ultimately botslop and limited by input data, unable to be fed on its own slop. As such, human artists aren't going away anytime soon, but at least we don't have to interact witht them.

[ZeElessarTelcontar]

100k wishlists

[stormvermin]

Alright I played the "demo." It kind of sucks but I didn't hate it. It felt like something the guy threw together as an early attempt at using UE, sort of like a school project. Regardless, it's two years old and I didn't take it as representative of anything. Also was funny that the player looked like a 56%er, likely a stock asset or something. Again, reserving judgment for the upcoming more legitimate demo.

[RangerBoo]

libtards don't know things, they just say stuff they think is real

https://www.gamingbible.com/news/knight ... 8-20260123

It seems as though, despite aims to be “historically accurate”, Knight’s Path’s female characters do not follow this formula.

But I guess women just have false eyelashes, blush and winged eyeliner like that naturally, huh?

NO WOMEN EVER WORE MAKEUP EVER BEFORE THE MODERN PERIOD!!!!!!!!

What is funny is most of the people I see getting mad over the beautiful women in Knight's Path are gay men and liberal women online. I'll let you figure out why.

[jcd]

Well... yeah! Most gays I've come across don't really care about this ****. The ones that do are a very tiny minority and are hated by the other members of the gay community for being obnoxious faeries as they are called. Women, especially Jewish and white liberal women, are the biggest pushers of LGBTQ content in entertainment.

There's no such thing as porn for women. Porn was created and exists solely for men, to satisfy a need that men have. Porn for women is kinda like menstrual pads for men, or gay marriage. Grammatically correct but semantically nonsensical.

[A Chinese opium den]

Well... yeah! Most gays I've come across don't really care about this ****. The ones that do are a very tiny minority and are hated by the other members of the gay community for being obnoxious faeries as they are called. Women, especially Jewish and white liberal women, are the biggest pushers of LGBTQ content in entertainment.

There's no such thing as porn for women. Porn was created and exists solely for men, to satisfy a need that men have. Porn for women is kinda like menstrual pads for men, or gay marriage. Grammatically correct but semantically nonsensical.

Counterpoint: Titanic grossed billions and I've never met a man who thought it was particularly good.

[Stack of Turtles]

Well... yeah! Most gays I've come across don't really care about this ****. The ones that do are a very tiny minority and are hated by the other members of the gay community for being obnoxious faeries as they are called. Women, especially Jewish and white liberal women, are the biggest pushers of LGBTQ content in entertainment.

There's no such thing as porn for women. Porn was created and exists solely for men, to satisfy a need that men have. Porn for women is kinda like menstrual pads for men, or gay marriage. Grammatically correct but semantically nonsensical.

Have you ever actually looked at the books women read? I mean, they usually put it right on the cover.

[aimlesshealer]

You're trading a temporary problem for a much stickier one. Truths will always bubble out of human creativity eventually (even in spite of the artist) because humans are organisms which are a part of nature, and you can only deny nature for so long before the consequences destroy you.

You say this like botslop is somehow eliminating "human creativity". The bot does not create slop on its own. Someone has to tell it to do that. The creative process is still there, you're just removing the meatsack that produces it. The machine replaces the worker, not the designer.

Of course, botslop is ultimately botslop and limited by input data, unable to be fed on its own slop. As such, human artists aren't going away anytime soon, but at least we don't have to interact witht them.

I'm familiar with the creative process and also have experience using gen AI. What a human + gen AI does is not the creative process. It's difficult to describe the difference, but I'm going to try.

With gen AI you barely scratch the surface of your own mind; there's no depth to it. It's like a completely different circuit. Sure the end result is superficially "a picture" or "a story" or whatever, but you're stripping out the input of memories, sensations, and happy accidents that feed into real human creativity. Listen to any artist who made great works talk about their process and you'll see this very clearly. Off the top of my head, Shigeru Miyamoto created Chain Chomps based off a childhood experience of a dog attacking him but being held back by its chain. An AI would never draw on something so unexpected for a game about jumping. Using gen AI even just for brainstorming eliminates the possiblity of that because you're not reaching into your mind at all, you're poking at a prompt and seeing if something nice pops out.

This goes for visual art as well, but because nobody studies art theory any more they just see pretty pictures and conclude that nothing will be lost if the "pretty picture making" is turned over to a bot. Watch the Story of Painting by Sister Wendy man, idk. There's intentionality and experience that go into every single component of visual artwork. That standard of excellence shouldn't be thrown away just because most artists nowadays are incompetent libs who churn out furry porn and pictures of fat ******* all day. NO art should be slop, whether it's a barrel in a video game or a package of dish soap. An artist's job is to fill the world with beauty and meaning. We used to have standards, but then, we used to be white...

I'm not naysaying out of sentimentality like "won't anyone please think of the artists?!" It's because two are simply not equivalent in a way that's not obvious if you aren't an artsy fart.

To bring this back on topic, these devs using AI for "brainstorming" lessens my confidence in their ability to design a game. Best case scenario they only used it to get examples of weird medieval stuff rather than offload their entire brains to the thing. Won't know until the game comes out.

[Norfleet]

I'm familiar with the creative process and also have experience using gen AI. What a human + gen AI does is not the creative process. It's difficult to describe the difference, but I'm going to try.

With gen AI you barely scratch the surface of your own mind; there's no depth to it. It's like a completely different circuit. Sure the end result is superficially "a picture" or "a story" or whatever, but you're stripping out the input of memories, sensations, and happy accidents that feed into real human creativity. Listen to any artist who made great works talk about their process and you'll see this very clearly. Off the top of my head, Shigeru Miyamoto created Chain Chomps based off a childhood experience of a dog attacking him but being held back by its chain. An AI would never draw on something so unexpected for a game about jumping. Using gen AI even just for brainstorming eliminates the possiblity of that because you're not reaching into your mind at all, you're poking at a prompt and seeing if something nice pops out.

I think you are both overestimating what you're creating (some random vidya game or meme image) and misunderestimating what botslop can do these days. Also, how ridiculously self-important artists fancy themselves to be and the ludicrous amounts they demand to most likely regurgitate you some botslop anyway. Don't believe any artist with a portfolio that doesn't extend before like 2015.