The thing is, an “attractive Negress” is just a white girl with dark skin (kind of like drows but in real life). Like Sheeva in RE5. She's attractive because she has no Negress characteristics apart from her skin color.methoxetamine wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 16:46KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 16:20My point is that even brainwashed white and Asian authors/developers can't help but portray ******* with their true (real-world) attributes and obviously have trouble making them “real fantasy characters in a fantasy setting with fantasy rules.”
I don't know, I think it's an interesting pattern. Even the most brainwashed indoctrinated goy will continue to make ******* out of *******, because a ****** can't be anything but that, a ******.
(I'm super tired so I may have a hard time explaining myself but I think it's pretty clear)
I'd pay to see the conversation between this guy and the jew or libshit who told him that he made his negresses too attractive and that they needed to be more realistic and ugly
We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
Post videogames with a cocky negress with an afro
Last edited by KOS-MOS on June 20th, 2025, 17:38, edited 1 time in total.
Tags:
I partially agree with this. Mostly because you have plenty of non anglo nosed, chubby cheeked/ non standard facial structured woman, that can be classed as pretty and far from being white. Just that it's not the monkey jawed uggo negress.KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 17:37The thing is, an “attractive Negress” is just a white girl with dark skin (kind of like drows but in real life). Like Sheeva in RE5. She's attractive because she has no Negress characteristics apart from her skin color.methoxetamine wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 16:46KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 16:20My point is that even brainwashed white and Asian authors/developers can't help but portray ******* with their true (real-world) attributes and obviously have trouble making them “real fantasy characters in a fantasy setting with fantasy rules.”
I don't know, I think it's an interesting pattern. Even the most brainwashed indoctrinated goy will continue to make ******* out of *******, because a ****** can't be anything but that, a ******.
(I'm super tired so I may have a hard time explaining myself but I think it's pretty clear)
I'd pay to see the conversation between this guy and the jew or libshit who told him that he made his negresses too attractive and that they needed to be more realistic and ugly
At the end of the day, hollywood doesn't even need to search out ******* straight off the boat. They have to get the prettiest ones out of the ones that reside in USA, and they'd be race mixed anyway. What does it matter if they got anglo features? Those mixed ******* gonna identify as ******* anyway.
Last edited by orinEsque on June 20th, 2025, 18:02, edited 6 times in total.
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
To be fair, she's underwater. Blacks don't swim because they sink. That's not a problem with a game about being permanently underwater, and wearing swim flippers to increase your effective thrust. It's rather like how bricks don't really fly, but anything can fly with a good enough TWR.logincrash wrote: ↑ January 24th, 2025, 06:52The weird ****** up underwater creatures are more realistic than blacks being able to swim.
Tell me you are very, very, VERY young without telling me your age. Dynaheir, Viconia, Jolee Bindo, Sarevok, The Valsharess. All these characters existed before you got your first plebstation. They are black fantasy characters and most people don't even remember they are black. So, no. It's not impossible to make black fantasy characters. Whether or not it's desirable to do so is a different discussion, but this thread is missing something very obvious:KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 15:34They are simply unconsciously based. The fact is, even for the most indoctrinated of them, it's simply impossible to include a ****** in a work of fiction or fantasy without depicting his true attributes. You can turn a white or even a white-Asian into any kind of character in any context - and even make them a hybrid race - but with *******, it's simply impossible, because deep down, they know what they really are. Even if they won't admit it, you can see it in their work.

THIS is not a character, but rather an object of worship. Progressivism is meant to replace religions and bears many of the "features" a traditional religion would have, including sacraments. To a libshit being acknowledged by a ****** is their sacrament, portraying ******* and making sure everyone else submits to niggerdom a moral and religious imperative. It's also a sexual perversion for them, as evidenced by the fact that many woketards have a jungle fetish. So when you play a nigress in a modern game you are basically playing some pervert's coomer game, aside from taking part in a NWO sacrament. There's absolutely nothing "based" about it, these portrayals are as animalistic as possible because they are supposed to be as "holy" as possible, in-game writing and world consistency be damned.
The only flow of money is from the (((usual suspects))) towards a big incinerator. ***** and commies aren't doing it for the money, the massive losses of Disney, Concord and many woke games are proof there's no real financial incentive. If anything, market forces should push them towards making beautiful and perky white women and yet that doesn't happen. Because FAITH >>> money. What good is money if you can't atone for the sin of being born white?orinEsque wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 17:26I usually like to think about the flow of money behind these absurd motivations.
Last edited by Eyestabber on June 20th, 2025, 19:00, edited 2 times in total.
There is. USAID has been handing them money. Tax free to make woke movies.Eyestabber wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 18:58The only flow of money is from the (((usual suspects))) towards a big incinerator. ***** and commies aren't doing it for the money, the massive losses of Disney, Concord and many woke games are proof there's no real financial incentive. If anything, market forces should push them towards making beautiful and perky white women and yet that doesn't happen. Because FAITH >>> money. What good is money if you can't atone for the sin of being born white?
Also think of it like this:
JewA wants to send millions to JewB. JewB, doesn't want to pay tax on the money he just got. So JewA "Invests" in JewB's new movie in exchange for whatever he wanted to REALLY buy. JewB takes the money spends it on cocaine and hookers and spends a tiny amount on cheap diversity hires, spits out a **** movie.
Declares millions of dollars of losses on **** movie. Then next year uses those losses to write off tax he should be paying paid on the business that actually made profit. Win.
Last edited by orinEsque on June 20th, 2025, 19:18, edited 3 times in total.
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
It's not a replacement of Religion, what we are currently seeing is that secularism is the wrong approach. It's not something replacing religion, it is simply a religion just created by Insane instead of wise people. People do get mad without understanding what reality is and the effects of this madness can be observed now.
Resident Anti-feminist MRA, Race-mixer and no I'm not woke and not gay. Married with children, My writing style is shit, live with it or ignore me.
Except that I was not focusing on the color of the skin but the whole race features. Drow are not *******, they are dark-skinned elves. Elves are basically pointy-eared Aryans.Eyestabber wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 18:58Tell me you are very, very, VERY young without telling me your age. Dynaheir, Viconia, Jolee Bindo, Sarevok, The Valsharess. All these characters existed before you got your first plebstation. They are black fantasy characters and most people don't even remember they are black. So, no. It's not impossible to make black fantasy characters. Whether or not it's desirable to do so is a different discussion, but this thread is missing something very obvious:KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 15:34They are simply unconsciously based. The fact is, even for the most indoctrinated of them, it's simply impossible to include a ****** in a work of fiction or fantasy without depicting his true attributes. You can turn a white or even a white-Asian into any kind of character in any context - and even make them a hybrid race - but with *******, it's simply impossible, because deep down, they know what they really are. Even if they won't admit it, you can see it in their work.
THIS is not a character, but rather an object of worship. Progressivism is meant to replace religions and bears many of the "features" a traditional religion would have, including sacraments. To a libshit being acknowledged by a ****** is their sacrament, portraying ******* and making sure everyone else submits to niggerdom a moral and religious imperative. It's also a sexual perversion for them, as evidenced by the fact that many woketards have a jungle fetish. So when you play a nigress in a modern game you are basically playing some pervert's coomer game, aside from taking part in a NWO sacrament. There's absolutely nothing "based" about it, these portrayals are as animalistic as possible because they are supposed to be as "holy" as possible, in-game writing and world consistency be damned.
The only flow of money is from the (((usual suspects))) towards a big incinerator. ***** and commies aren't doing it for the money, the massive losses of Disney, Concord and many woke games are proof there's no real financial incentive. If anything, market forces should push them towards making beautiful and perky white women and yet that doesn't happen. Because FAITH >>> money. What good is money if you can't atone for the sin of being born white?orinEsque wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 17:26I usually like to think about the flow of money behind these absurd motivations.
My point is exactly this: they can't make actual fantasy *******, because ******* are filthy. The most accurate fantasy ******* you can find are orcs. These have the racial features of *******, and their culture, and their mentality, etc.
Also, assuming I'm young and then proceeding to use the most millennial wording is peak irony.
I would accept tribal ******* in DnD, like in Chult.KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 21:18Except that I was not focusing on the color of the skin but the whole race features. Drow are not *******, they are dark-skinned elves. Elves are basically pointy-eared Aryans.Eyestabber wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 18:58Tell me you are very, very, VERY young without telling me your age. Dynaheir, Viconia, Jolee Bindo, Sarevok, The Valsharess. All these characters existed before you got your first plebstation. They are black fantasy characters and most people don't even remember they are black. So, no. It's not impossible to make black fantasy characters. Whether or not it's desirable to do so is a different discussion, but this thread is missing something very obvious:KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 15:34They are simply unconsciously based. The fact is, even for the most indoctrinated of them, it's simply impossible to include a ****** in a work of fiction or fantasy without depicting his true attributes. You can turn a white or even a white-Asian into any kind of character in any context - and even make them a hybrid race - but with *******, it's simply impossible, because deep down, they know what they really are. Even if they won't admit it, you can see it in their work.
THIS is not a character, but rather an object of worship. Progressivism is meant to replace religions and bears many of the "features" a traditional religion would have, including sacraments. To a libshit being acknowledged by a ****** is their sacrament, portraying ******* and making sure everyone else submits to niggerdom a moral and religious imperative. It's also a sexual perversion for them, as evidenced by the fact that many woketards have a jungle fetish. So when you play a nigress in a modern game you are basically playing some pervert's coomer game, aside from taking part in a NWO sacrament. There's absolutely nothing "based" about it, these portrayals are as animalistic as possible because they are supposed to be as "holy" as possible, in-game writing and world consistency be damned.
The only flow of money is from the (((usual suspects))) towards a big incinerator. ***** and commies aren't doing it for the money, the massive losses of Disney, Concord and many woke games are proof there's no real financial incentive. If anything, market forces should push them towards making beautiful and perky white women and yet that doesn't happen. Because FAITH >>> money. What good is money if you can't atone for the sin of being born white?orinEsque wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 17:26I usually like to think about the flow of money behind these absurd motivations.
My point is exactly this: they can't make actual fantasy *******, because ******* are filthy. The most accurate fantasy ******* you can find are orcs. These have the racial features of *******, and their culture, and their mentality, etc.
Also, assuming I'm young and then proceeding to use the most millennial wording is peak irony.
A quest involving voodoo magic and things don't sound bad.
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
See: Redguards. Also, trolls.KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 21:18My point is exactly this: they can't make actual fantasy *******, because ******* are filthy. The most accurate fantasy ******* you can find are orcs. These have the racial features of *******, and their culture, and their mentality, etc.
except comparing trolls to ******* is ********
Last edited by LemonDemonGirl on June 20th, 2025, 21:39, edited 1 time in total.
I hate the Antichrist!
I don't know for trolls. But to me redguards looks more like arabs~persians than actual *******.LemonDemonGirl wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 21:39See: Redguards. Also, trolls.KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 21:18My point is exactly this: they can't make actual fantasy *******, because ******* are filthy. The most accurate fantasy ******* you can find are orcs. These have the racial features of *******, and their culture, and their mentality, etc.
except comparing trolls to ******* is ********
Well, I'm really not into bethesda games so don't ask me about the lore or anything. It's just how I see them.
You are a ******, therefore you need to make corrections, otherwise I will assume you are trying to speak about EVROPA and White countries, and as a ******, you are not allowed to.Bertram_Tung wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 14:52This is an American board. All references to population statistics will be about America by default unless stated otherwise. I am not going to make a disclaimer on every post I make that says "In America" because that should be assumed by default. That burden is on foreigners.jcd wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 14:32Correction, they make up 6 percent of the population of non-white, niggerified countries.Bertram_Tung wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 01:56they make up like 6 percent of the population it is absolutely ridiculous how much i have to see them in every aspect of media and culture
And if theres some other autistic response that says "Well acktually its 7.8%" **** off, I don't care, my point still stands.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
-
Bertram_Tung
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Jan 2, '24
- Location: SunCo Gasoline Facility
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
You're*jcd wrote: ↑ June 21st, 2025, 00:55You are a ******, therefore you need to make corrections, otherwise I will assume you are trying to speak about EVROPA and White countries, and as a ******, you are not allowed to.Bertram_Tung wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 14:52This is an American board. All references to population statistics will be about America by default unless stated otherwise. I am not going to make a disclaimer on every post I make that says "In America" because that should be assumed by default. That burden is on foreigners.jcd wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 14:32
Correction, they make up 6 percent of the population of non-white, niggerified countries.
And if theres some other autistic response that says "Well acktually its 7.8%" **** off, I don't care, my point still stands.
It's tantamount to the same thing. Most of the people pushing this dysgenic and divisive slop are either 'atheist' (whatever the **** that actually means), or some form of self-hating pr*testant.Lord of Riva wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 20:06It's not a replacement of Religion, what we are currently seeing is that secularism is the wrong approach. It's not something replacing religion, it is simply a religion just created by Insane instead of wise people. People do get mad without understanding what reality is and the effects of this madness can be observed now.
Both groups simply hate Christianity, and Western Europe.
My Mods:
Kenshi:
viewtopic.php?t=3219-under-armour-edits-1-0-kenshi - Under Armour Edits
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3262-face-expansion-1-0-kenshi - Face Expansion
Kenshi:
viewtopic.php?t=3219-under-armour-edits-1-0-kenshi - Under Armour Edits
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3262-face-expansion-1-0-kenshi - Face Expansion
There are MANY good books on the subject of wokeism as a religion like Penn's "False Dawn: The United Religions Initiative, Globalism, and the Quest for a One-World Religion" (2004), "Woke Racism" by John McWhorter, "Awake, Not Woke" by Noelle Mering among others. There's no definitive dissection of the woke creed, but anyone who tries to understand "progressives" without considering the spiritual angle is looking at an incomplete picture. A long time ago I read Vladimir Tismăneanu's "On Communism: The Fate of a Political Religion" and it's possible to draw parallels between "classic" communist spirituality and woke spirituality, the later being much more refined than the former. The woke creed's informality is its main strength and allows it to infiltrate and corrupt every other religion, major or minor. From "female Pastors" to "liberal Catholics" with pride flags at the altar and "proud atheists", in the end they all end up serving the same cause.
Double post because I forgot about this thread.
Game: Dredge

Game: Dredge

You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Agatha Christie – Murder on the Orient Express, the game will faithfully adapt the original story while modernizing the plot, introducing a new dual protagonist alongside Hercule Poirot named Jane Royce, a private detective who is tracking a murderer when her investigation leads her to cross paths with Poirot.

► Show Spoiler
Since Sheva was already posted how about Sorceress from Gauntlet Dark Legacy? I didn't mind her because she had big bazongas.

This is funny because a negress would sell the armor for scrap or pawn it to get some Newports.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
*Niggadins
So what do they do if they fall off the boat?
asf wrote:weeb
The skull and bones has a ******* afro, this has got to be a parody at this point. These ******* know their games are zogslop.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
To be fair, it would be perfectly valid and historical to have black pirates, since pirates would often pillage slave ships and recruit the cargo as pirates. You didn't really hear bitching and moaning about Adewale in that Assassin's Creed pirate game because he was a historically plausible character and a returning cast member.ThulsaDoomer wrote: ↑ March 22nd, 2026, 21:32The skull and bones has a ******* afro, this has got to be a parody at this point. These ******* know their games are zogslop.
That they have to make a SCENE about it bodes ill for the game, though. It suggests they are pushing for forced DEI rather than historical representation, which means the game will flop.
Some of them were not even black. Their portraits are dark, some of them had dark skin, but they're not *******. Drows are not *******. And Sarevok is a retcon ******, he's not a ****** in BG1.Eyestabber wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 18:58Dynaheir, Viconia, Jolee Bindo, Sarevok, The Valsharess. All these characters existed before you got your first plebstation. They are black fantasy characters and most people don't even remember they are black.
And I've never wanted a ****** in my fantasy game nor have I been comfortable with it. Every ******* time I find an actual ****** in my RPG it revolts me. And I remember every single ******. I can imagine it isn't easy for you since you're surrounded by ******* and you are probably a quadroon, but for us white people ******* are revolting and not wanted in fantasy games, literature, movies or life tbqh
Another day of waiting for the moment when the technology is advanced enough to wash the niggness away from our screens in real time. DLSS5 is one step in that direction.






