I'm an even more powerless deputy than youOyster Sauce wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 16:58Duh, I'm the powerless deputy
We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
RPGHQ: Academia's favorite RPG site!
VAE VICTIS
Imagine these "people" actually living off taxpayer money while just writing this reddit level stupid dogshit. I think that they hate us precisely because they know we'd at least make them work if we were in power.
Last edited by Trickster on June 19th, 2025, 17:04, edited 1 time in total.
Indeed I did.Xenich wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 15:13You just described modern academia (or well, for the last 30 years at least).KOS-MOS wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 11:57Okay I finished reading
Conclusion : It's ********
They present this document as some kind of analytical essay, with a façade of pseudo-rigor that's really just a cover to regurgitate the same old nonsense you can find everywhere—only to end with the oh-so-original conclusion: "We're fascists."
Not worth translating anyway
They like to imagine that people could only say such things after being "raised to hate" from a young age, and project a requirement for brainwashing or the malicious influence of some grand, higher power, like Israel, Iran, Russia or China, due to their own lack of autonomy, and absolute obeisance to the mundane mainstream & exoteric hierarchies. I'm not sure how they justify it, because somewhere along the line, there needs to be some autonomy, it can't all be a hive-mind, or else it's like a dog chasing its tail.
Most people here probably became disillusioned with the sentiments in Leftism that they had absorbed from the dominant culture, like Tabula Rasa, over their lifetime. This is unfathomable to them. I suppose it's a bit like a cultist seeing people leave "the truth." Their ego & emotions can't handle it. They'll try to find any way to explain away the "extremism" or apostacy other than recognising that the people leaving may have a point about their dogma. They have to be the ones with the most discernment & self-awareness, but they're really just fanatically emotional & delusional, placing blind ideals over any kind of pragmatic viewpoint.
I sometimes see Leftists slip and say White people are born evil. This either reveals that they know their "equality" blank slatism is a sham and it's really just an antiwhite Marxist crusade, inherently contradictory, or that they're incapable of consistent logic and don't realise they're undermining what's supposed to be their own worldview.
Most people here probably became disillusioned with the sentiments in Leftism that they had absorbed from the dominant culture, like Tabula Rasa, over their lifetime. This is unfathomable to them. I suppose it's a bit like a cultist seeing people leave "the truth." Their ego & emotions can't handle it. They'll try to find any way to explain away the "extremism" or apostacy other than recognising that the people leaving may have a point about their dogma. They have to be the ones with the most discernment & self-awareness, but they're really just fanatically emotional & delusional, placing blind ideals over any kind of pragmatic viewpoint.
I sometimes see Leftists slip and say White people are born evil. This either reveals that they know their "equality" blank slatism is a sham and it's really just an antiwhite Marxist crusade, inherently contradictory, or that they're incapable of consistent logic and don't realise they're undermining what's supposed to be their own worldview.
I apologize if my responses were not relevant to your needs. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, and I only provide responses based on the information provided to me.
Everyone mentioned in that post should get a badge lmao
I don't hate women, I love women, that's why I think every man should own several
he has gay/soy av with magnifying glass it/they could be it
Thou shalt not SIMP
Why is every asianic or brown countries government so prone to brainwashing? It's like they know they can't make a stable country without controlling their civiliansArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:14They like to imagine that people could only say such things after being "raised to hate" from a young age, and project a requirement for brainwashing or the malicious influence of some grand, higher power, like Israel, Iran, Russia or China, due to their own lack of autonomy, and absolute obeisance to the mundane mainstream & exoteric hierarchies. I'm not sure how they justify it, because somewhere along the line, there needs to be some autonomy, it can't all be a hive-mind, or else it's like a dog chasing its tail.
Most people here probably became disillusioned with the sentiments in Leftism that they had absorbed from the dominant culture, like Tabula Rasa, over their lifetime. This is unfathomable to them. I suppose it's a bit like a cultist seeing people leave "the truth." Their ego & emotions can't handle it. They'll try to find any way to explain away the "extremism" or apostacy other than recognising that the people leaving may have a point about their dogma. They have to be the ones with the most discernment & self-awareness, but they're really just fanatically emotional & delusional, placing blind ideals over any kind of pragmatic viewpoint.
I sometimes see Leftists slip and say White people are born evil. This either reveals that they know their "equality" blank slatism is a sham and it's really just an antiwhite Marxist crusade, inherently contradictory, or that they're incapable of consistent logic and don't realise they're undermining what's supposed to be their own worldview.
I don't hate women, I love women, that's why I think every man should own several
I’ve always laughed at their "they can’t even define woke" ********. "Woke" is a fusion mix of feminism, LGBT ideology, multiculturalism, and other artificial constructs engineered for specific political goals. Despite claiming to defend people’s rights, these movements are built entirely on performative activism, pseudo-moralizing, social passiveness, toxicity, lies, and attacks on natural human harmony, our social bonds, emotions, and fundamental values.
Woke is all of this, weaponized through culture. Sure, verbal definitions may vary ("opinions differ" and bla bla bla), but the core remains intuitively recognizable to most. And it’s not like wokies are ideologically monolithic either, there are what, a hundred flavors of feminism and gender theory alone? Yet their thought patterns share key traits, making "woke" culturally identifiable. If they can’t define it, that’s for the same reason a schizoid can’t admit he’s ill: zero self-reflection or critical thinking (another hallmark of wokeness, incidentally).
Woke is all of this, weaponized through culture. Sure, verbal definitions may vary ("opinions differ" and bla bla bla), but the core remains intuitively recognizable to most. And it’s not like wokies are ideologically monolithic either, there are what, a hundred flavors of feminism and gender theory alone? Yet their thought patterns share key traits, making "woke" culturally identifiable. If they can’t define it, that’s for the same reason a schizoid can’t admit he’s ill: zero self-reflection or critical thinking (another hallmark of wokeness, incidentally).
Last edited by Trickster on June 19th, 2025, 18:00, edited 3 times in total.
Imagine how limp the wrists are of this ****** who wrote all this cuckbabble


asf wrote:weeb
It's incredibly easy to describe woke and spot itTrickster wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:55I’ve always laughed at their "they can’t even define woke" ********. "Woke" is a fusion mix of feminism, LGBT ideology, multiculturalism, and other artificial constructs engineered for specific political goals. Despite claiming to defend people’s rights, these movements are built entirely on performative activism, pseudo-moralizing, social passiveness, toxicity, lies, and attacks on natural human harmony, our social bonds, emotions, and fundamental values.
Woke is all of this, weaponized through culture. Sure, verbal definitions may vary ("opinions differ" and bla bla bla), but the core remains intuitively recognizable to most. And it’s not like wokies are ideologically monolithic either, there are what, a hundred flavors of feminism and gender theory alone? Yet their thought patterns share key traits, making "woke" culturally identifiable. If they can’t define it, that’s for the same reason a schizoid can’t admit he’s ill: zero self-reflection or critical thinking (another hallmark of wokeness, incidentally).
I don't hate women, I love women, that's why I think every man should own several
Looks like typical "Yes, I'm a male feministmethoxetamine wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 18:00Imagine how limp the wrists are of this ****** who wrote all this cuckbabble
![]()
► Show Spoiler
Because these people are not only lower IQ, they lack internalised guilt. For East Asians it's all about saving face, not shaming others or their families, so whilst there's a degree of social concern, it all has to be verbally reinforced, the threats & consequences, usually regarding status, need to be overt. For MENA & Africans, they are only controlled by fear of violent repercussions, like Sharia law chopping a hand off.DoubleOO7 wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:53Why is every asianic or brown countries government so prone to brainwashing? It's like they know they can't make a stable country without controlling their civiliansArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:14They like to imagine that people could only say such things after being "raised to hate" from a young age, and project a requirement for brainwashing or the malicious influence of some grand, higher power, like Israel, Iran, Russia or China, due to their own lack of autonomy, and absolute obeisance to the mundane mainstream & exoteric hierarchies. I'm not sure how they justify it, because somewhere along the line, there needs to be some autonomy, it can't all be a hive-mind, or else it's like a dog chasing its tail.
Most people here probably became disillusioned with the sentiments in Leftism that they had absorbed from the dominant culture, like Tabula Rasa, over their lifetime. This is unfathomable to them. I suppose it's a bit like a cultist seeing people leave "the truth." Their ego & emotions can't handle it. They'll try to find any way to explain away the "extremism" or apostacy other than recognising that the people leaving may have a point about their dogma. They have to be the ones with the most discernment & self-awareness, but they're really just fanatically emotional & delusional, placing blind ideals over any kind of pragmatic viewpoint.
I sometimes see Leftists slip and say White people are born evil. This either reveals that they know their "equality" blank slatism is a sham and it's really just an antiwhite Marxist crusade, inherently contradictory, or that they're incapable of consistent logic and don't realise they're undermining what's supposed to be their own worldview.
With the Africans, the threat must be more present & imminent, because more of them don't have the ability to think about future consequences. I assume their subconscious can still be conditioned through repetition.
Now, all three of these probably work on most Europeans, but there is a higher frequency of people, among Europeans, who independently operate, day by day, with a strong emotional urge to stick to the morality they were conditioned with during childhood. They might feel a reflexive, strong disgust towards perceived social wrongs, and a guilt when faced with the opportunity to break social norms or pacts (this mechanism isn't concrete though, and can be worn away, like someone being raised in a strict Christian community having to re-align themselves to different norms, or maybe they'll just go off the rails and no norm matters). There is also a higher degree of people that seek to conform to their ingroup and will delude themselves towards this effort-- in an evolutionary sense, this is only natural, when people had to survive through harsh winters, with little food, they had to depend on their ability to conform to tribes, or else they would be kicked out, and likely starve in the cold.
I assume there's only a small minority of people that have any sense of autonomy or are driven primarily by reasoning & logic. The potential of such people to be dissidents likely scares people who lack such qualities, as they can't really relate to the cognitive processes. They may just assume they're aberrant, innately dangerous psychopaths, and to be fair, people's sense of logic are often flawed and can be used to justify taboo or violent actions. I suppose that makes it a double-edged sword.
I would define it as the upper extreme of cultural Marxism, particularly Afrocentric Marxism, where popular support or tolerance of it begins to unravel, due to the realisation of how cynical and unhinged Leftists are.Trickster wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:55I’ve always laughed at their "they can’t even define woke" ********. "Woke" is a fusion mix of feminism, LGBT ideology, multiculturalism, and other artificial constructs engineered for specific political goals. Despite claiming to defend people’s rights, these movements are built entirely on performative activism, pseudo-moralizing, social passiveness, toxicity, lies, and attacks on natural human harmony, our social bonds, emotions, and fundamental values.
Woke is all of this, weaponized through culture. Sure, verbal definitions may vary ("opinions differ" and bla bla bla), but the core remains intuitively recognizable to most. And it’s not like wokies are ideologically monolithic either, there are what, a hundred flavors of feminism and gender theory alone? Yet their thought patterns share key traits, making "woke" culturally identifiable. If they can’t define it, that’s for the same reason a schizoid can’t admit he’s ill: zero self-reflection or critical thinking (another hallmark of wokeness, incidentally).
Most people who were already on board with Civil Rights, comfortable with 60s-90s stuff, which includes a lot of the things you mentioned, object to the level of overt & irrational antiwhite or antihetero hatred, because then it's dipping into the territory of violent revolution, rather than coexistence. It's an infringement of social pacts and the exoteric morality that underpins "diversity." The people expect the Martin Luther speech, Ghandi pacifism, not Robespierre or Trotsky malice.
Last edited by ArcaneLurker on June 19th, 2025, 18:22, edited 1 time in total.
I apologize if my responses were not relevant to your needs. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, and I only provide responses based on the information provided to me.
French people really ******* HATE to use English, too. lol. So they do it VERY begrudgingly and that's why you can see those "tells", they don't WANT to learn it fully, that would be letting the English win!rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 05:44My position on whether it's Furin is: no.
Why?
French people are major ESLs. They all have tells a mile off, I can detect every single French speaker on this forum without even trying(easiest way is they put a space between the end of a sentence and punctuation)
Never saw Furin make a single ESL mistake. Either he wasn't born in whatever frogland that is, or it's not him.
The name alone is suspicious, but it's just too much effort for a powerpoint slide.
You can define it really easily, every feminist believes that men, because they are men oppress women, because they are women. There is no "variety" or "flavor" of feminism, it's a Larp, like discussing if **** tastes better with sugar sprinkles on or not.Trickster wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:55I’ve always laughed at their "they can’t even define woke" ********. "Woke" is a fusion mix of feminism, LGBT ideology, multiculturalism, and other artificial constructs engineered for specific political goals. Despite claiming to defend people’s rights, these movements are built entirely on performative activism, pseudo-moralizing, social passiveness, toxicity, lies, and attacks on natural human harmony, our social bonds, emotions, and fundamental values.
Woke is all of this, weaponized through culture. Sure, verbal definitions may vary ("opinions differ" and bla bla bla), but the core remains intuitively recognizable to most. And it’s not like wokies are ideologically monolithic either, there are what, a hundred flavors of feminism and gender theory alone? Yet their thought patterns share key traits, making "woke" culturally identifiable. If they can’t define it, that’s for the same reason a schizoid can’t admit he’s ill: zero self-reflection or critical thinking (another hallmark of wokeness, incidentally).
Similarly, gender is also part of every feminist, even the Terf. The underlying conjecture is one of "social sex" every feminist needs it otherwise the claim that the result of something is not born out of biological differences but because of oppression would not work.
This can be used for every level of their movement, it is inherently a cult and those do not work with complexity but simple dogma.
Last edited by Lord of Riva on June 20th, 2025, 12:21, edited 2 times in total.
Resident Anti-feminist MRA, Race-mixer and no I'm not woke and not gay. Married with children, My writing style is shit, live with it or ignore me.
I'm continually impressed by the fact that academia, too, in many departments, now comprises almost entirely meme screenshots from public websites and little else.
It's part of a general trend. FYI, Princeton University Press was the first, about a decade ago, to allow profanity in technical monographs. (Albeit it was for philosophy books.)
It's part of a general trend. FYI, Princeton University Press was the first, about a decade ago, to allow profanity in technical monographs. (Albeit it was for philosophy books.)
One day, buddy. Keep up doing a great job!Nooneatall wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 11:11I never get quoted in these papers and I really hate it because I'm constantly saying extreme and disgusting ****. It's not fair man.
Academia nowadays is a joke, they're not intellectuals, but the gay priestly cast of the globohomo. The average IQ is likely far, far lower than what it was even a decade ago, as more and more academics get purged for failing purity tests, and then get replaced by dysgenic, mentally ill freaks.NotAI wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 05:00I'm continually impressed by the fact that academia, too, in many departments, now comprises almost entirely meme screenshots from public websites and little else.
Jewish tricks
Like my mods? Buy me a beer at ㅤPayPalㅤ or Subscribe at ㅤSUBSCRIBESTAR ㅤ
It's called tricknology.
► Show Spoiler
Last edited by Trickster on June 20th, 2025, 12:48, edited 1 time in total.
There are yotube channels with a million of subs dedicated solely to showing people the **** the wokies do.
Even normie are tired of their ********.
Most of them are grifters, but yes it is at least a sign that normie opinions have started to shift more hostile towards wokeness and ******.Trickster wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 12:57There are yotube channels with a million of subs dedicated solely to showing people the **** the wokies do.
Even normie are tired of their ********.
Until they are all ready to use the word ****** or *** in their speech that doesn't count.Trickster wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 12:57There are yotube channels with a million of subs dedicated solely to showing people the **** the wokies do.
Even normie are tired of their ********.
Well, at least you're less likely to be shot, because while they tend to shoot the Sheriff, they don't shoot the deputy.
Correct. They can't accept the two base truths.ArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ June 19th, 2025, 17:14They like to imagine that people could only say such things after being "raised to hate" from a young age, and project a requirement for brainwashing or the malicious influence of some grand, higher power, like Israel, Iran, Russia or China, due to their own lack of autonomy, and absolute obeisance to the mundane mainstream & exoteric hierarchies. I'm not sure how they justify it, because somewhere along the line, there needs to be some autonomy, it can't all be a hive-mind, or else it's like a dog chasing its tail.
Most people here probably became disillusioned with the sentiments in Leftism that they had absorbed from the dominant culture, like Tabula Rasa, over their lifetime. This is unfathomable to them. I suppose it's a bit like a cultist seeing people leave "the truth." Their ego & emotions can't handle it. They'll try to find any way to explain away the "extremism" or apostacy other than recognising that the people leaving may have a point about their dogma. They have to be the ones with the most discernment & self-awareness, but they're really just fanatically emotional & delusional, placing blind ideals over any kind of pragmatic viewpoint.
I sometimes see Leftists slip and say White people are born evil. This either reveals that they know their "equality" blank slatism is a sham and it's really just an antiwhite Marxist crusade, inherently contradictory, or that they're incapable of consistent logic and don't realise they're undermining what's supposed to be their own worldview.
1: there are people that are completely immune to their (and everyone else's) ideological overtures.
2: there are people that can look at the facts, make enlightened suppositions, then blame the correct people for the correct activities, despite all the decades of lying and gaslighting to fool them.
People who can do those things are dangerous because they can present a counter-narrative and cannot be dissuaded by being called names they don't care about because they have no respect for the name callers.
And, worse, they might just wake normies up to the truth using facts and reason which is a stronger mind changer than name calling and gaslighting.
You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Oh, and I forgot.
A telling point, and a corollary to my point 2.
They can't conceive of a person developing their own worldview from thinking.
They implicitly assume that all people are like them: in need of some dominant intellectual authority to tell them what they should believe and why. And so you do, too.
Not that this is anything new. The Catholic Church also struggled mightily with this same issue up to today, in varying degrees.
They cannot imagine that someone can read diverse works and observe reality and come to conclusions. Especially "correct" conclusions. (Part of the problem is that their ideology (any of them) is wrong and conflicts with reality, but they manage to not-think past the dissonance.)
People that have accepted any dominance hierarchy above them are self-selected as members, as people that feel it's best to outsource their thinking.
Talking to anyone in such an organization is inherently a mistake. You are not interacting with a person. You are interacting with a ideology they have been programmed with.
The likelihood of you changing their thinking is extremely low, because they don't think. NPC proles...
A telling point, and a corollary to my point 2.
They can't conceive of a person developing their own worldview from thinking.
They implicitly assume that all people are like them: in need of some dominant intellectual authority to tell them what they should believe and why. And so you do, too.
Not that this is anything new. The Catholic Church also struggled mightily with this same issue up to today, in varying degrees.
They cannot imagine that someone can read diverse works and observe reality and come to conclusions. Especially "correct" conclusions. (Part of the problem is that their ideology (any of them) is wrong and conflicts with reality, but they manage to not-think past the dissonance.)
People that have accepted any dominance hierarchy above them are self-selected as members, as people that feel it's best to outsource their thinking.
Talking to anyone in such an organization is inherently a mistake. You are not interacting with a person. You are interacting with a ideology they have been programmed with.
The likelihood of you changing their thinking is extremely low, because they don't think. NPC proles...
Last edited by Rand on June 21st, 2025, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.
You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
You don't really believe this, do you? You're just using it as a rhetorical device?Rand wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2025, 19:33People who can do those things are dangerous because they can present a counter-narrative and cannot be dissuaded by being called names they don't care about because they have no respect for the name callers.
And, worse, they might just wake normies up to the truth using facts and reason which is a stronger mind changer than name calling and gaslighting.
The whole thing is blinkered, brother. But the idea that name-calling and gaslighting is less powerful as a motivator than the pursuit or exposition of truth really takes the cake.



