HQ's Rules & Guarantees

Post by **GhostCow** » May 31st, 2025, 03:59

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 30th, 2025, 22:49
Anyone who mentions the new King of the Hill seasons, or implies there are new King of the Hill seasons will be banned

Why the hate? I haven't looked into it. Mike Judge did amazing with the new Beavis and Butt-Head and he seems like he's still got it?

Post by **Vergil** » May 31st, 2025, 04:18

GhostCow wrote: ↑ May 31st, 2025, 03:59

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 30th, 2025, 22:49
Anyone who mentions the new King of the Hill seasons, or implies there are new King of the Hill seasons will be banned
Why the hate? I haven't looked into it. Mike Judge did amazing with the new Beavis and Butt-Head and he seems like he's still got it?

Hank got blacked and bobby is *****

Post by **Atlantico** » June 6th, 2025, 17:20

Vergil wrote: ↑ May 31st, 2025, 04:18

GhostCow wrote: ↑ May 31st, 2025, 03:59

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ May 30th, 2025, 22:49
Anyone who mentions the new King of the Hill seasons, or implies there are new King of the Hill seasons will be banned
Why the hate? I haven't looked into it. Mike Judge did amazing with the new Beavis and Butt-Head and he seems like he's still got it?
Hank got blacked and bobby is *****

******* ******

Every single post garbage, **** you're a waste of oxygen creep

Post by **Vergil** » June 6th, 2025, 17:24

Atlantico wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2025, 17:20
creep

Post by **Atlantico** » June 6th, 2025, 18:57

Vergil wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2025, 17:24

Atlantico wrote: ↑ June 6th, 2025, 17:20
creep
**garbage post**

est

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » March 19th, 2026, 03:34

A rule for a rule, the AI rule has been bumped off because it does not seem to be needed. Just implicit policy.

New rule:

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 3rd, 2023, 02:02
Do not take deliberate action to harm HQ or its ability to operate.

gay content rule reworded:

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 3rd, 2023, 02:02
Don't post homosexual content. Go be gay somewhere else.

Stack of Turtles · Post by **Stack of Turtles** » March 19th, 2026, 07:35

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 03:34
A rule for a rule, the AI rule has been bumped off because it does not seem to be needed. Just implicit policy.

New rule:
rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 3rd, 2023, 02:02
Do not take deliberate action to harm HQ or its ability to operate.

Did someone do something or is this a pre-emptive addition?

Post by **logincrash** » March 19th, 2026, 08:12

Stack of Turtles wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 07:35

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 03:34
A rule for a rule, the AI rule has been bumped off because it does not seem to be needed. Just implicit policy.

New rule:
rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 3rd, 2023, 02:02
Do not take deliberate action to harm HQ or its ability to operate.

Did someone do something or is this a pre-emptive addition?

Probably in response to Vergil starting to say **** like "Nice modding forum you got there. It'd be a shame if people complained to IP holders en masse so that they would crack down on it." again.

Stack of Turtles · Post by **Stack of Turtles** » March 19th, 2026, 08:34

logincrash wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 08:12

Stack of Turtles wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 07:35

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 03:34
A rule for a rule, the AI rule has been bumped off because it does not seem to be needed. Just implicit policy.

New rule:

Did someone do something or is this a pre-emptive addition?
Probably in response to Vergil starting to say **** like "Nice modding forum you got there. It'd be a shame if people complained to IP holders en masse so that they would crack down on it." again.

Not gonna lie, that was my first guess, but I glanced over his recent posts and didn't see anything so I thought it must be someone else.

Post by **logincrash** » March 19th, 2026, 08:47

Stack of Turtles wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 08:34

logincrash wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 08:12

Stack of Turtles wrote: ↑ March 19th, 2026, 07:35

Did someone do something or is this a pre-emptive addition?
Probably in response to Vergil starting to say **** like "Nice modding forum you got there. It'd be a shame if people complained to IP holders en masse so that they would crack down on it." again.
Not gonna lie, that was my first guess, but I glanced over his recent posts and didn't see anything so I thought it must be someone else.

If I am wrong, I do sincerely apologize to Vergil for casting aspersions.