We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
Which setting do you prefer in games?
Which setting do you prefer in games?
Vote.
Last edited by Yankee Zulu on March 6th, 2025, 11:41, edited 5 times in total.
Tags:
>stated wuxia, which is basically a dead genre but no post apocalypse.
What the **** is the term for stuff like Vampire The Masquerade? Urban fantasy?
Steam friend code: 1525876263
added post-apocTinky Winky wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:19>stated wuxia, which is basically a dead genre but no post apocalypse.
Added 2 more options
- folklore
- fairytales, myths and legends
- folklore
- fairytales, myths and legends
World of darkness? Gothic punk? Added.Valter wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:23What the **** is the term for stuff like Vampire The Masquerade? Urban fantasy?
-
rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 45458
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
Steampunk is a stupid setting. The one good so-called "steam punk" game is just Victorian fantasy.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Please add Arabian Nights and Wild West settings to the list to reset the poll again.
Either way the setting is underutilized.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:32Steampunk is a stupid setting. The one good so-called "steam punk" game is just Victorian fantasy.
I like very magical settings. Middle-Earth is boring to me because aside from like one haunted crypt and forest it's mostly devoid of anything fantastical for the common man. I want there to be gnomes hiding in bushes everywhere, dickass wizards constantly ******* things up for everyone, communities of mythical creatures, and cursed rivers that make you horney when drink from them. Closest I can think of in games would be Azeroth or Golarion.
To me, the aesthetics are more important. I like colorful artbook fantasy settings. Doesn't matter if it's medieval like Warcraft, or looks like medieval Japan like in Utawarerumono, or looks like the 19th century/steampunk like Trails, or looks like futuristic sci fi like Xeno. As long as it looks really amazing. I also prefer a heroic tone, where the heroes are actually good and actually trying to make things better.



I think this is mainly an issue stemming from the Peter Jackson action movies, which has a very mundane look. Some of the art by Ted Nasmith and the Brothers Hildebrandt depict a more appealing world.Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 17:44I like very magical settings. Middle-Earth is boring to me because aside from like one haunted crypt and forest it's mostly devoid of anything fantastical for the common man. I want there to be gnomes hiding in bushes everywhere, dickass wizards constantly ******* things up for everyone, communities of mythical creatures, and cursed rivers that make you horney when drink from them. Closest I can think of in games would be Azeroth or Golarion.



I hate what Redditors love. Steampunk, cyberpunk, Lovecraftian.
When we say something like "steampunk" or "solarpunk", we are alluding to the visual aesthetic idea of that time but pushed to the extreme. Victorian era and steam engines to the extreme. Cowboypunk would allude to cowboys, but to the extreme.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:32Steampunk is a stupid setting. The one good so-called "steam punk" game is just Victorian fantasy.
Me in the hat.
That's exactly what steampunk started out as. It was fine before it meant sticking goggles and cogs on tophats worn by fat chicks. It also didn't have anything to do with "punk" as in counter-cultural like the term is interpreted today. K.W. Jeter intended the term in the early 80s to describe the books that he, James Blaylock, and Tim Powers were writing at the time that were fantasy and light science fiction with Victorian backdrops. It was a play on words about cyberpunk and had nothing to do with any of the modern trappings like things considered virtues to reddit users these days.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:32Steampunk is a stupid setting. The one good so-called "steam punk" game is just Victorian fantasy.
I love works that explore the implications and consequences of advanced tech or magic in our every-day, contemporary world.
Not too far into the future that it's unrecognizable, but just alien enough to see a familiar society in unfamiliar circumstances.
The former is more commonplace, like Cyberpunk and Post-Apocalypse. But I'd like to see more of the latter, of which I can only name VTMB off the top of my head, aside some visual novels.
Not too far into the future that it's unrecognizable, but just alien enough to see a familiar society in unfamiliar circumstances.
The former is more commonplace, like Cyberpunk and Post-Apocalypse. But I'd like to see more of the latter, of which I can only name VTMB off the top of my head, aside some visual novels.
Steam friend code: 1525876263
Makes me think of the King's Bounty series (I haven't played the original).Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 17:44I like very magical settings. Middle-Earth is boring to me because aside from like one haunted crypt and forest it's mostly devoid of anything fantastical for the common man. I want there to be gnomes hiding in bushes everywhere, dickass wizards constantly ******* things up for everyone, communities of mythical creatures, and cursed rivers that make you horney when drink from them. Closest I can think of in games would be Azeroth or Golarion.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Every time you post this another fat chick buys a top hat with goggles and cogs.Acrux wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 18:35That's exactly what steampunk started out as. It was fine before it meant sticking goggles and cogs on tophats worn by fat chicks. It also didn't have anything to do with "punk" as in counter-cultural like the term is interpreted today. K.W. Jeter intended the term in the early 80s to describe the books that he, James Blaylock, and Tim Powers were writing at the time that were fantasy and light science fiction with Victorian backdrops. It was a play on words about cyberpunk and had nothing to do with any of the modern trappings like things considered virtues to reddit users these days.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:32Steampunk is a stupid setting. The one good so-called "steam punk" game is just Victorian fantasy.
I didn't realize I have fans who memorize my material.Brugmans wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 20:04Every time you post this another fat chick buys a top hat with goggles and cogs.Acrux wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 18:35That's exactly what steampunk started out as. It was fine before it meant sticking goggles and cogs on tophats worn by fat chicks. It also didn't have anything to do with "punk" as in counter-cultural like the term is interpreted today. K.W. Jeter intended the term in the early 80s to describe the books that he, James Blaylock, and Tim Powers were writing at the time that were fantasy and light science fiction with Victorian backdrops. It was a play on words about cyberpunk and had nothing to do with any of the modern trappings like things considered virtues to reddit users these days.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 11:32Steampunk is a stupid setting. The one good so-called "steam punk" game is just Victorian fantasy.
I wouldn't want to forget such an instructive post.Acrux wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 20:42I didn't realize I have fans who memorize my material.Brugmans wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 20:04Every time you post this another fat chick buys a top hat with goggles and cogs.Acrux wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 18:35
That's exactly what steampunk started out as. It was fine before it meant sticking goggles and cogs on tophats worn by fat chicks. It also didn't have anything to do with "punk" as in counter-cultural like the term is interpreted today. K.W. Jeter intended the term in the early 80s to describe the books that he, James Blaylock, and Tim Powers were writing at the time that were fantasy and light science fiction with Victorian backdrops. It was a play on words about cyberpunk and had nothing to do with any of the modern trappings like things considered virtues to reddit users these days.
I assumed "Victorian Fantasy" would be like the Fable 2/3 setting.
I apologize if my responses were not relevant to your needs. As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or opinions, and I only provide responses based on the information provided to me.
I like low magic medieval fantasy. Magic exists but is rare and dangerous. Monsters exists but they are monsters. They are to be feared and their destruction requires preparation and extensive training. No +1 magic swords. No "scrolls of revivify". Healing can only be achieved by natural means, medicine and divine miracles. Magic items are wondrous relics.
Outside of that, I like space opera sci-fi when its more on the hopeful side. For dark and cynic settings, either Lovecraftian or cyberpunk.
Outside of that, I like space opera sci-fi when its more on the hopeful side. For dark and cynic settings, either Lovecraftian or cyberpunk.
Normies eventually get ahold of everything and ruin it. Dieselpunk will succumb eventually.Tangerine wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 18:00I hate what Redditors love. Steampunk, cyberpunk, Lovecraftian.
I was going to say something similar. My favorite settings are fundamentally bright, even if dark things happen sometimes. As cool as those settings may be in some ways, I can't tolerate the way Chaos' ultimate victory is a certainty in Warhammer 40,000, nor the way """God""" is spiteful and uncaring in World of Darkness.Val the Moofia Boss wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 17:59To me, the aesthetics are more important. I like colorful artbook fantasy settings. Doesn't matter if it's medieval like Warcraft, or looks like medieval Japan like in Utawarerumono, or looks like the 19th century/steampunk like Trails, or looks like futuristic sci fi like Xeno. As long as it looks really amazing. I also prefer a heroic tone, where the heroes are actually good and actually trying to make things better.
I think most people want bright settings and they're made grimdark only because spiritually Jewish artists are allergic to good and beauty.WhiteShark wrote: ↑ March 7th, 2025, 17:31I was going to say something similar. My favorite settings are fundamentally bright, even if dark things happen sometimes. As cool as those settings may be in some ways, I can't tolerate the way Chaos' ultimate victory is a certainty in Warhammer 40,000, nor the way """God""" is spiteful and uncaring in World of Darkness.Val the Moofia Boss wrote: ↑ March 6th, 2025, 17:59To me, the aesthetics are more important. I like colorful artbook fantasy settings. Doesn't matter if it's medieval like Warcraft, or looks like medieval Japan like in Utawarerumono, or looks like the 19th century/steampunk like Trails, or looks like futuristic sci fi like Xeno. As long as it looks really amazing. I also prefer a heroic tone, where the heroes are actually good and actually trying to make things better.
(Warhammer 40k is the exception that proves the rule because the idea that "all sides are evil" mostly hinges on measuring the Imperium of Man with the stick of liberal values)
Conversely when noblebright settings are made, they align with a warped and flaccid idea of good that makes the whole thing feel childish, sometimes on purpose.
People then settle for g(r)ay morality as the least bad option (and then it's fake anyway).
low fantasy, meets medieval combat, meets rare high tech factions.
Many such examples.
Many such examples.
