We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
No Alphabets 7.1 β Baldur's Gate 3
Looking for the download?
This mod's files are on ModHQ.
Go to mod page
Moderator: Mod Janitor
Just download the mod that gives her big tits and *** for days. She's really not all that ugly once she has properly female proportions.
[/quote]
Thanks! Could you please link the mod?
[/quote]
Thanks! Could you please link the mod?
Thank you, but when I link my forum account it says Im unauthorized to use the vault.
There's no such mod on this website. You'll have to look on nexus.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 09:00Thank you, but when I link my forum account it says Im unauthorized to use the vault.
Victors clap when others succeed; Losers feel every spotlight as a personal bleed.
Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 07:43
Sadly Im no writer, but I would have added more feminine and pretty women to romance in the game, right now there are to many ugly ones and only one that can be called attractive.
Anything you can think of would have been a massive improvement. The large bulk of the writing in BG3 barely passes mediocrity at the best of times.( these are same people praise Amazon Fallout TV show. *******β¦LOL)
-
rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 45474
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
-
Geolocation
Adventurer's Guild
He was messing with you.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 09:00Thank you, but when I link my forum account it says Im unauthorized to use the vault.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Steam friend code: 40552640 https://steamcommunity.com/friends/add | email: [email protected]
Having trouble running an old Windows game?
Rusty's Stuff Collection
Am I mistaken, or were the NPC better looking in the early access?
I think that pantsuit should be gone, too.
Calling your hetero husband or wife "partner" is one of the most Californian lib thing to do.....
I ******* despise that *********. Even if I choose to ignore the political connotations of it, it still rips the romance out of everything. "Hey, PARTNER. By the way, we bang uglies every now and then, riiiiiiiiight?" - some slaanesh demon in disguise.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 19:18Calling your hetero husband or wife "partner" is one of the most Californian lib thing to do.....
HUSBAND.
WIFE.
These are strong words I know, but boy do both of them sell a STORY. I wonder why that is.
It's probably for unmarried people.Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 19:42I ******* despise that *********. Even if I choose to ignore the political connotations of it, it still rips the romance out of everything. "Hey, PARTNER. By the way, we bang uglies every now and then, riiiiiiiiight?" - some slaanesh demon in disguise.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 19:18Calling your hetero husband or wife "partner" is one of the most Californian lib thing to do.....
HUSBAND.
WIFE.
These are strong words I know, but boy do both of them sell a STORY. I wonder why that is.![]()
Can't see any reason not to use husband / wife if married.
It's probably for jealous unmarried people. In real life*BobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:22It's probably for unmarried people.Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 19:42I ******* despise that *********. Even if I choose to ignore the political connotations of it, it still rips the romance out of everything. "Hey, PARTNER. By the way, we bang uglies every now and then, riiiiiiiiight?" - some slaanesh demon in disguise.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 19:18Calling your hetero husband or wife "partner" is one of the most Californian lib thing to do.....
HUSBAND.
WIFE.
These are strong words I know, but boy do both of them sell a STORY. I wonder why that is.![]()
Can't see any reason not to use husband / wife if married.
I agree.
It's an issue I have seen with other recent CRPGs too. Like in Kingmaker for example the romances for straight dudes in the OG game without any DLCs or "secret endings" were either a bimbo warrior or a bisexual swinger mage. A properly feminine tiefling was added in a DLC later on, but she too was made bisexual, for reasons. Only the aforementioned bimbo warrior remained as the sole straight female.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 07:43Sadly Im no writer, but I would have added more feminine and pretty women to romance in the game, right now there are to many ugly ones and only one that can be called attractive.
Then Wrath of the Righteous came around and the romances for men were worse; again without counting "secret" stuff, the only three available women for straight guys were two sociopaths and a succubus. Only one of the mentioned sociopaths was straight, and even though the succubus had a "trad waifu" personality, pretty much all of her personal quest revolves around the fact that she used to be a bicycle that everyone was riding. lol
All this makes me nostalgic for the romances of the first two BG games.
@Unknown998
How are you ******* up the quote feature so reliably?
Are you manually deleting the quote header every time for some reason?

How are you ******* up the quote feature so reliably?
Are you manually deleting the quote header every time for some reason?

Last edited by Rand on September 12th, 2024, 20:42, edited 4 times in total.
You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
How are you ******* up the quote feature so reliably?Rand wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:35Sadly Im no writer, but I would have added more feminine and pretty women to romance in the game, right now there are to many ugly ones and only one that can be called attractive.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 07:43Here's to another 990 posts from you. So, how would you write her if you were doing the character writing of Baldur's Gate 3?
Are you manually deleting the quote header every time for some reason?

[/quote]
Yeah sorry, was my mistake.
Yeah sorry, was my mistake.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:37How are you ******* up the quote feature so reliably?Rand wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:35Sadly Im no writer, but I would have added more feminine and pretty women to romance in the game, right now there are to many ugly ones and only one that can be called attractive.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 07:43Here's to another 990 posts from you. So, how would you write her if you were doing the character writing of Baldur's Gate 3?
Are you manually deleting the quote header every time for some reason?
![]()
[/quote]
You did it again...

You may as well not bother replying to my posts if it's to argue anything except concrete facts or your personal opinion. I still probably won't see it.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
Reject your retarded-wing political programming and learn to think.
If you can.
You did it again...Rand wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:42Yeah sorry, was my mistake.Unknown998 wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:37How are you ******* up the quote feature so reliably?Rand wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:35
Sadly Im no writer, but I would have added more feminine and pretty women to romance in the game, right now there are to many ugly ones and only one that can be called attractive.
Are you manually deleting the quote header every time for some reason?
![]()

[/quote]
I dont think I did, there just was a passage that I did post before there.
So what do you call the person you're with, if not married?Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:27It's probably for jealous unmarried people. In real life*BobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:22It's probably for unmarried people.Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 19:42
I ******* despise that *********. Even if I choose to ignore the political connotations of it, it still rips the romance out of everything. "Hey, PARTNER. By the way, we bang uglies every now and then, riiiiiiiiight?" - some slaanesh demon in disguise.
HUSBAND.
WIFE.
These are strong words I know, but boy do both of them sell a STORY. I wonder why that is.![]()
Can't see any reason not to use husband / wife if married.
I agree.
Boyfriend/Girlfriend/FiancΓ© might not always ring the same in a formal setting.
Heartsweet or sweetheart from the ground-upBobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:55So what do you call the person you're with, if not married?Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:27It's probably for jealous unmarried people. In real life*BobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:22
It's probably for unmarried people.
Can't see any reason not to use husband / wife if married.
I agree.
Boyfriend/Girlfriend/FiancΓ© might not always ring the same in a formal setting.
I subscribe to the aforementioned "suitor" as an idea myself, of course I have a bias in favor of anything that doesn't come from our contemporary lexicon. Either way it's not as though this is untreaded ground, devs of today have centuries worth of resources to pull from -- but they'd have to care about not ferrari-ing their setting first.BobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:55So what do you call the person you're with, if not married?Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:27It's probably for jealous unmarried people. In real life*BobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:22
It's probably for unmarried people.
Can't see any reason not to use husband / wife if married.
I agree.
Boyfriend/Girlfriend/FiancΓ© might not always ring the same in a formal setting.
I personally blame MARVEL. More specifically the MCU which I believe what was popularized into the mainstream the idea of injecting modern-day jargon and Murrican humor in settings where it doesn't belong and always breaks the immersion.
This is disgusting in every regard.
Edit: As for the other discussion, perhaps "betrothed"?
Last edited by Envuen on September 12th, 2024, 21:16, edited 1 time in total.
Doesn't "suitor" imply not already together, though? As in just courting, not in a relationship.Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 21:03I subscribe to the aforementioned "suitor" as an idea myself, of course I have a bias in favor of anything that doesn't come from our contemporary lexicon. Either way it's not as though this is untreaded ground, devs of today have centuries worth of resources to pull from -- but they'd have to care about not ferrari-ing their setting first.BobT wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:55So what do you call the person you're with, if not married?Revyscutlass wrote: β September 12th, 2024, 20:27
It's probably for jealous unmarried people. In real life*
I agree.
Boyfriend/Girlfriend/FiancΓ© might not always ring the same in a formal setting.
I'd be alright with just changing it to "Husband", as presumably people weren't out of wedlock too long back then.







