Wokies started bombing my game

[Norfleet]

Why not prioritize the child? Why is the mother move valuable than the baby?

A baby isn't an economically productive unit in the present, and a baby with no mother will starve to death and die anyway because you can't milk a bull. Therefore, the choice is between having one person, or having no people.

[Trickster]

Some people don't like my views and started rate-bombing my game on itch. Fortunately, I still have pretty good average (about 4.8/5), but I hope that there will be no more people like this. Anyway, I don't want to report them, because I am pro free-speech and I don't want to be a hypocrite.

Free speech doesn't cover direct insults, the crazy mumbling of woke foids packed with their cultish terminology, or posts that are simply irrelevant. You get that, right?

[Tinky Winky]

It's not chud enough if itch.io didn't outright shadowban your game. My project just got shadow'd into oblivion without any notification.

[Kalarion]

Honestly, the racist eugenicist in me is at odds with my anti-abortion position. I'm still wrestling with it.

The tenet is at core a Christian one, you should follow Christ, do as He commands and live as He lived

The truth notwithstanding, the evils that you encourage in other people will always come back to you at scale. Or, as I said in another thread on another (the same?) topic, the evil you promote will redound to you. Abortion on demand was in large part driven by late 19th- and early 20th-century eugenicists who had precisely that goal—the elimination of the ****** population and other undesirables in America—in mind. How has it turned out for us? Did we abstain from the practice at scale? Are we better off? Did the plan even have the desired effect in the first place? Have undesired populations gone down? Even been controlled?

Food for thought when you consider Freakanomics arguments. Also food for thought: both authors were ****.

[Norfleet]

Are we better off? Did the plan even have the desired effect in the first place? Have undesired populations gone down? Even been controlled?

Honestly? Yes. There was a drop in crime beginning in the 1990s, about 18 years after abortion was legalized. It seems that for some reason an entire generation of criminals may never have come to be.

The other thing to consider: Leftists love abortions way more than Conservatives. If entire generations of leftoids had not been allowed to abort their spawn, those spawn, which would have been leftists as well, as political orientation is a heritable attribute, would vote left in greater numbers, and we would be even worse off than we are today.

Therefore, on a purely strategic basis, why should we oppose this? As a wise man once said, "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."

[Adeptus]

BTW, Do You know if there are some sites dedicated for publishing non-woke games? Something like Based Mods, but for full games, not mods?

[Stack of Turtles]

Abortion on demand was in large part driven by late 19th- and early 20th-century eugenicists who had precisely that goal—the elimination of the ****** population and other undesirables in America—in mind. How has it turned out for us? Did we abstain from the practice at scale? Are we better off? Did the plan even have the desired effect in the first place? Have undesired populations gone down? Even been controlled?

Yes.

Blacks and hispanics are below replacement in America when you exclude immigration, which, statistically, is substantially and might be entirely down to abortion. A study from 2000 found that banning abortion would have increased the black TFR by 15%. If we assume it would have shrunk proportionally from then to now, it would still be below replacement, although higher than it is, but this assumption is also probably unfounded, since TFR changes act as a feedback loop, so it likely would not have decreased as much at the higher level — but I don't have the data to guess whether we would be looking at above or just below the line.

So to a significant degree, abortion controlled or helped control the native-born untermenschen population, forcing politicians to adopt mass immigration as a population replacement strategy instead, which led to a populist backlash that probably would not have happened if it were just American blacks increasing.

Also, black women abort far more than whites, making up about a vastly outsized 40% of abortions. Some sources say that the black abortion rate is twice as high as the black birth rate. Hispanics also abort above their population weight, but less dramatically.

[Godjjjita]

Honestly, the racist eugenicist in me is at odds with my anti-abortion position. I'm still wrestling with it.

The tenet is at core a Christian one, you should follow Christ, do as He commands and live as He lived

The truth notwithstanding, the evils that you encourage in other people will always come back to you at scale. Or, as I said in another thread on another (the same?) topic, the evil you promote will redound to you. Abortion on demand was in large part driven by late 19th- and early 20th-century eugenicists who had precisely that goal—the elimination of the ****** population and other undesirables in America—in mind. How has it turned out for us? Did we abstain from the practice at scale? Are we better off? Did the plan even have the desired effect in the first place? Have undesired populations gone down? Even been controlled?

Food for thought when you consider Freakanomics arguments. Also food for thought: both authors were ****.

The only eugenics I believe to be moral and rational is self control.
I'm unhealthy thus I won't have children and subject them to diseases that run in my family. If there could be a service that does genetic screening of couples before they get married to know if their children would be healthy I would fully support, but such eugenics only work with intelligent people who actually care about the future and their possible offspring.

[Norfleet]

So to a significant degree, abortion controlled or helped control the native-born untermenschen population, forcing politicians to adopt mass immigration as a population replacement strategy instead, which led to a populist backlash that probably would not have happened if it were just American blacks increasing.

And consider also: It's easier to stop immigration than it is to stop a troublesome minority citizen population from increasing their numbers.

On the other hand, social welfare essentially ruined the black population. Prior to the widespread welfare of Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society", blacks were improving their general lot in life through their own efforts. Lyndon Johnson destroyed this, creating a dependent underclass that consistently votes Democrat to this day....and from the famous quote about it, this was on purpose.

[Stack of Turtles]

So to a significant degree, abortion controlled or helped control the native-born untermenschen population, forcing politicians to adopt mass immigration as a population replacement strategy instead, which led to a populist backlash that probably would not have happened if it were just American blacks increasing.

And consider also: It's easier to stop immigration than it is to stop a troublesome minority citizen population from increasing their numbers.

On the other hand, social welfare essentially ruined the black population. Prior to the widespread welfare of Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society", blacks were improving their general lot in life through their own efforts. Lyndon Johnson destroyed this, creating a dependent underclass that consistently votes Democrat to this day....and from the famous quote about it, this was on purpose.

First part: yes, that was what I was talking about by mentioning the populist backlash. Trump wouldn't have been able to bring the other one down to nearly zero like he has this one.

Second part: Welfare is perhaps the most dysgenic thing that can happen to any community. It will destroy the most accomplished fraction of the population within one generation.

[Pizza]

It's always the ******* ********. Report them & upload your game to Steam.

[AmericanMonarchist]

Why does Itch allow people who never bought the game review something they obviously never used?

[Algol]

Your game needs a lot of work, man. I played it last night several times with different characters. It needs way more depth. That said, I like the idea, and I hope you keep developing it. I'm assuming you're using the Choice of Games software, right? Or is it Twine?

That said, just ignore the ****** brigade. You don't owe them ****. Giving them attention just makes things worse.

I look forward to seeing what you do with it next.

[logincrash]

Your game needs a lot of work, man. I played it last night several times with different characters. It needs way more depth. That said, I like the idea, and I hope you keep developing it. I'm assuming you're using the Choice of Games software, right? Or is it Twine?

That said, just ignore the ****** brigade. You don't owe them ****. Giving them attention just makes things worse.

I look forward to seeing what you do with it next.

Choice of Games games don't really look like that.

[Jordy]

Has anyone seen my car keys?

[logincrash]

Has anyone seen my car keys?

Did you get a nice buzz going?

[Jordy]

Has anyone seen my car keys?

Did you get a nice buzz going?

Reported for off topic post.

[logincrash]

Has anyone seen my car keys?

Did you get a nice buzz going?

Reported for off topic post.

Ah, but see, by making you report my post I brought it back on topic of tattling on people for their based beliefs.
Check mate, atheist.

[Norfleet]

Why does Itch allow people who never bought the game review something they obviously never used?

The better question is why they think those constitute negative reviews. If I see a bunch of wokies trash a game, I am more interested, not less interested.

[Adeptus]

And another one! This time, quite deep analysis - they/them get few things wrong, but they/them actually played the game.

[asf]

game looks gay

[Magick]

And another one! This time, quite deep analysis - they/them get few things wrong, but they/them actually played the game.

"Typical white male cis hetero breeding fetish".
As in, normal human biological behaviour that we'd be extinct without, then.

And lol "transwomen are the most vulnerable persons".
Transwomen are men, and therefore LEAST vulnerable.

[ThulsaDoomer]

And another one! This time, quite deep analysis - they/them get few things wrong, but they/them actually played the game.

This is the most braindead **** I've read in a long while. If by deep analysis, you mean deeply full of ********. This has zero value as a piece of criticism, it's so useless I'd consider a vague bug report more gratifying. Likely only played the game to make their review harder to report, as it is indeed referencing real game information.

[Algol]

How about you stop listening to what ******** have to say and make your game better instead?

[Adeptus]

How about you stop listening to what ******** have to say and make your game better instead?

Well, I am trying!

[orinEsque]

And another one! This time, quite deep analysis - they/them get few things wrong, but they/them actually played the game.

"Typical white male cis hetero breeding fetish".
As in, normal human biological behaviour that we'd be extinct without, then.

And lol "transwomen are the most vulnerable persons".
Transwomen are men, and therefore LEAST vulnerable.

0.001% population commiting 50% of the mass shootings lately.

[DecadeRiptide]

But who's got the most haters, adeptus or orin?

[orinEsque]

But who's got the most haters, adeptus or orin?

I have haters from libtards and rightards. I win.

[Adeptus]

I assume it is definitely Orin. My project is still quite niche.

[Ranselknulf]

report them

Turn it into an advertising moment.

For every 1,000 negative comments, you will donate $1 to the conservative cause/charity/hateful person of your choice.

Maybe offer to donate money to the Department of Defense to purchase bombs for the Iran peace efforts, or donate to a Charlie Kirk memorial fund, or possibly to support christian programs trying to detransition transgenders.

Idk, get creative.

Embrace the PT Barnum philosophy, there is no such thing as bad publicity.