Hooray: ****** gamedevs being fired thread

[Eyestabber]

what’s your brilliant solution to the industry’s problems then?

What relevance does this have to video games? Resorting to violence as a way to solve problems is something I would typically contemplate. However applying such an approach to petty matters like entertainment seems silly to me.

If you look at this image and actually believe it’s a credible way to purge the decay within entertainment media without any sense of irony, you’d be better off focusing your energy on more urgent issues, like putting drug addicts and other assorted filth in concentration camps or killing immigrants in your neighborhood. Otherwise you’re only going to make your enemies and even your family think you’re a troubled schizophrenic who needs help.

Gassing PD.png

[gerey]

Resorting to violence as a way to solve problems is something I would typically contemplate.

The people pozzing games belong to the same group of people that wants to see my race destroyed, my culture erased, White children raped, and they find it all funny.

Violence against such animals is a moral absolute.

[psychic_dream]

However applying such an approach to petty matters like entertainment seems silly to me.

Are you familiar with Will and Grace?

The push to normalize this kind of degenerate filth was well underway by the 90s. You even said it yourself at one point, it’s just a symptom of a society and culture in decline. It was bound to happen.

The surge and spread of feminism after WWII paved the way for the cultural diseases we’re dealing with now. The alt right is fine with tackling the race question, the homo question, and whatever else, but they will never openly touch the woman question. And until someone starts calling out the Jew's stand in army for what it is, we’re going nowhere.

[Tangerine]

However applying such an approach to petty matters like entertainment seems silly to me.

Are you familiar with Will and Grace?

The push to normalize this kind of degenerate filth was well underway by the 90s. You even said it yourself at one point, it’s just a symptom of a society and culture in decline. It was bound to happen.

The surge and spread of feminism after WWII paved the way for the cultural diseases we’re dealing with now. The alt right is fine with tackling the race question, the homo question, and whatever else, but they will never openly touch the woman question. And until someone starts calling out the Jew's stand in army for what it is, we’re going nowhere.

Yes, it was underway by the 90s, but if you had publicly hanged the showrunners for Will and Grace, we wouldn't be as far along the path as we are now. If control of entertainment production wasn't worthwhile, why would they have bothered?

[psychic_dream]

Also, much of the discontent with major franchises today comes from people who were introduced to them during a less corporate era.

“Man I grew up on Metal Gear Solid and God of War. To see the former become an open world snorefest and the latter turn into a cinematic slog where you raise someone else’s son is pretty depressing.” I get why some feel that way. The blame falls on both the industry and the devs. Is it sad? Sure. Am I emotionally stunned by it? Not at all.

To conclude, no, I’m not going to ignore the damage caused by hiring useless, incompetent employees who do nothing but busywork, or the impact of DEI and ESG nonsense. It’s a serious issue but not the core problem. I’ve seen people genuinely think gaming went to hell solely because of Sweet Baby Inc and the mulatto woman who runs it. That misses the bigger picture. Gaming today is beyond saving. It’s grown too huge to be left alone. The only thing that might change that is a full societal collapse. Obviously no one is going to destroy civilization over video games or movies.

Pray tell, do you genuinely believe the 80s/90s was not a saturated corporate era in America? It was just as bad as it was today, the only major difference was the shift towards complete consolidation and monopolies for corporations. Less competition, more direct control over all major markets and thus, greater power via lobbyists against the government's regulations and laws that may have stopped this decay.

I don't even understand the point of your posts here. You agree with us, then present counter arguments for no reason but to be a contrarian. Yes, the older era of gaming had its rough patches, so what? I ******* despise people who go "Yeah man, that whole era of society? It's so grey, wasn't perfect, wasn't terrible." The **** are you saying? This isn't an argument, it's a confused statement.

I'm tired of people telling us we should be focusing elsewhere. I want all liberal and marxist propaganda dead in the ground, in every facet that form takes. That includes gaming, which this forum is dedicated towards. If you're bothered by gamers wanting modern gaming purged by all measures, I have no idea why you're here.

I already know corporate influence in the U S was solidifying and getting deeply entrenched by the 1980s. You could argue that America was always meant to be a massive commercial zone. (I’m guessing you don’t mind me taking a jab at America since you’re a Canuck?) But gaming took a different path from the start. In the late 70s, it exploded with ambition.

Yes most of the revenue back then and into the early 80s came from arcades, and the video game crash did happen, flushing out a lot of shovelware. Crunch existed even then. But the spirit and passion for making genuine products, labors of love, was still there.

My issue with dimwits like Eyestabber is that he thinks getting rid of certain groups out of the entertainment industry by force will somehow bring back the past. He’s committed to this idea, which is completely ********.

As I’ve said, I’d have no qualms about using violence to solve longstanding problems if the law allowed it. I couldn’t care less about the lowlifes involved. But it doesn’t, and trying would only get you cut off by society.

Instead, work within the system we have. Vote for a conservative who actually represents your interests in your province or state, and organize your neighbors to support border security like rural Dutch and German men have been doing lately.

Rash moves done in the name of a “noble cause” will only land you in trouble. What did someone like Andrew Anglin gain by mobilizing his followers to bother a Jewess who was seeking to scam Richard Spencer and his family in a property deal? She sued him, courts hit him with millions in liabilities, and federal agencies came after him. Now he’s in exile, blocked from the banking system. Later on Richard Spencer shifted so far left that he now warns people that Trump is evil or will federally ban abortion.

Back to my original topic. I wasn’t playing devil’s advocate. I was stating what I believe and expected a civilized argument. Instead, I encounter underages whose response never goes beyond, “You’re a ****** lol stay mad.” One even made an image about me just to feel like he won a debate. I honestly feel quite sad for him.

[Norfleet]

You want a solution? I'll give you one: You can't gatekeep a castle that has already fallen, nor one that has always belonged to the enemy.

Sure you can. There's even a name for that. It's called a siege.

[Kalarion]

I already know corporate influence in the U S was solidifying and getting deeply entrenched by the 1980s. You could argue that America was always meant to be a massive commercial zone. (I’m guessing you don’t mind me taking a jab at America since you’re a Canuck?) But gaming took a different path from the start. In the late 70s, it exploded with ambition.

Yes most of the revenue back then and into the early 80s came from arcades, and the video game crash did happen, flushing out a lot of shovelware. Crunch existed even then. But the spirit and passion for making genuine products, labors of love, was still there.

My issue with dimwits like Eyestabber is that he thinks getting rid of certain groups out of the entertainment industry by force will somehow bring back the past. He’s committed to this idea, which is completely ********.

As I’ve said, I’d have no qualms about using violence to solve longstanding problems if the law allowed it. I couldn’t care less about the lowlifes involved. But it doesn’t, and trying would only get you cut off by society.

Instead, work within the system we have. Vote for a conservative who actually represents your interests in your province or state, and organize your neighbors to support border security like rural Dutch and German men have been doing lately.

Rash moves done in the name of a “noble cause” will only land you in trouble. What did someone like Andrew Anglin gain by mobilizing his followers to bother a Jewess who was seeking to scam Richard Spencer and his family in a property deal? She sued him, courts hit him with millions in liabilities, and federal agencies came after him. Now he’s in exile, blocked from the banking system. Later on Richard Spencer shifted so far left that he now warns people that Trump is evil or will federally ban abortion.

Back to my original topic. I wasn’t playing devil’s advocate. I was stating what I believe and expected a civilized argument. Instead, I encounter underages whose response never goes beyond, “You’re a ****** lol stay mad.” One even made an image about me just to feel like he won a debate. I honestly feel quite sad for him.

You're a ****** lol stay mad

Bottom text

[Stack of Turtles]

I already know corporate influence in the U S was solidifying and getting deeply entrenched by the 1980s. You could argue that America was always meant to be a massive commercial zone. (I’m guessing you don’t mind me taking a jab at America since you’re a Canuck?) But gaming took a different path from the start. In the late 70s, it exploded with ambition.

Yes most of the revenue back then and into the early 80s came from arcades, and the video game crash did happen, flushing out a lot of shovelware. Crunch existed even then. But the spirit and passion for making genuine products, labors of love, was still there.

My issue with dimwits like Eyestabber is that he thinks getting rid of certain groups out of the entertainment industry by force will somehow bring back the past. He’s committed to this idea, which is completely ********.

As I’ve said, I’d have no qualms about using violence to solve longstanding problems if the law allowed it. I couldn’t care less about the lowlifes involved. But it doesn’t, and trying would only get you cut off by society.

Instead, work within the system we have. Vote for a conservative who actually represents your interests in your province or state, and organize your neighbors to support border security like rural Dutch and German men have been doing lately.

Rash moves done in the name of a “noble cause” will only land you in trouble. What did someone like Andrew Anglin gain by mobilizing his followers to bother a Jewess who was seeking to scam Richard Spencer and his family in a property deal? She sued him, courts hit him with millions in liabilities, and federal agencies came after him. Now he’s in exile, blocked from the banking system. Later on Richard Spencer shifted so far left that he now warns people that Trump is evil or will federally ban abortion.

Back to my original topic. I wasn’t playing devil’s advocate. I was stating what I believe and expected a civilized argument. Instead, I encounter underages whose response never goes beyond, “You’re a ****** lol stay mad.” One even made an image about me just to feel like he won a debate. I honestly feel quite sad for him.

You're a ****** lol stay mad

Bottom text

In honor of our good friend Vergil, allow me to say:
Bottom text? Is that what they call what @psychic_dream sends to random men on grindr?

[psychic_dream]

You know what? I take back everything I said before.
The past has always been better by every possible metric. Violence could solve all your issues without facing consequences, and life would get immediately better if the authorities just let us kill our enemies in peace.
Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

[logincrash]

You know what? I take back everything I said before.
The past has always been better by every possible metric. Violence could solve all your issues without facing consequences, and life would get immediately better if the authorities just let us kill our enemies in peace.
Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Now you're getting it!

[Breathe]

You know what? I take back everything I said before.
The past has always been better by every possible metric. Violence could solve all your issues without facing consequences, and life would get immediately better if the authorities just let us kill our enemies in peace.
Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Don't be sad that you didn't get to experience the golden age of gaming. Just try to improve the world one step at a time within your sphere of influence.

[Norfleet]

Don't be sad that you didn't get to experience the golden age of gaming. Just try to improve the world one step at a time within your sphere of influence.

The thing is that the world within an individual's sphere of influence is generally quite small, and the outside world increasingly thus hostile to it.

As net improvement is a physical impossibility as net entropy must always increase, improving your local sphere of influence necessarily involves making the world a worse place, and they're not gonna like it.

[gerey]

Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Your argument is flawed because the left routinely engages in violence, be it physical, financial, political or legal. They use defacto terrorist groups and the power of the state to go after people they dislike, so what option is there left but to reply in kind?

One common issue with cuckservatives is that they want to "play by the rules", instead of wielding institutions like weapons against their political opponents like the liberals do when they gain power over them. It's no wonder the past century has been a near constant retreat against leftist onslaught when one side wages war on all fronts, while the other meekly requests that everyone be civil.

[Unhelpful Contrarian]

Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Your argument is flawed because the left routinely engages in violence, be it physical, financial, political or legal. They use defacto terrorist groups and the power of the state to go after people they dislike, so what option is there left but to reply in kind?

One common issue with cuckservatives is that they want to "play by the rules", instead of wielding institutions like weapons against their political opponents like the liberals do when they gain power over them. It's no wonder the past century has been a near constant retreat against leftist onslaught when one side wages war on all fronts, while the other meekly requests that everyone be civil.

Progressives are masters at playing the long with subversion that many conservatives failed to understand.

[Tangerine]

Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Your argument is flawed because the left routinely engages in violence, be it physical, financial, political or legal. They use defacto terrorist groups and the power of the state to go after people they dislike, so what option is there left but to reply in kind?

One common issue with cuckservatives is that they want to "play by the rules", instead of wielding institutions like weapons against their political opponents like the liberals do when they gain power over them. It's no wonder the past century has been a near constant retreat against leftist onslaught when one side wages war on all fronts, while the other meekly requests that everyone be civil.

Progressives are masters at playing the long with subversion that many conservatives failed to understand.

They're really not. They inherited the work of communists before them, who WERE good at the long game, but they threw that all away. They were unable to resist the temptation of turning the heat up on the burner to spite their enemies and too many frogs noticed.

[UltraFan123]

If you look at the propaganda from the Soviet Era, you see images of healthy and fit people together with their children, and even if they are superficially shown as a family unit they still made it so that all of them looked up to "Dear Leader" as their cohesive patriarchal figure.

The Soviets also generally banned abortion and birth control because even they knew that a population that doesn't reproduce is a population that will inevitably die off.

Now compare that with our modern-day commies who glorify sickness both physical and mental, as well as encourage people to kill their kids before they're even born.

Stalin would've already made them all face the wall.

[rusty_shackleford]

If you look at the propaganda from the Soviet Era, you see images of healthy and fit people together with their children, and even if they are superficially shown as a family unit they still made it so that all of them looked up to "Dear Leader" as their cohesive patriarchal figure.

The Soviets also generally banned abortion and birth control because even they knew that a population that doesn't reproduce is a population that will inevitably die off.

Now compare that with our modern-day commies who glorify sickness both physical and mental, as well as encourage people to kill their kids before they're even born.

Stalin would've already made them all face the wall.

All the subversive elements are for destroying a nation, they're the first to go during the revolution every time.

[rusty_shackleford]

big budget games will have a UI that is 98% identical to ever other big budget game on the market with 47 separate people credited under UI design
what the **** are they even doing

[wndrbr]

If you look at the propaganda from the Soviet Era, you see images of healthy and fit people together with their children, and even if they are superficially shown as a family unit they still made it so that all of them looked up to "Dear Leader" as their cohesive patriarchal figure.

The Soviets also generally banned abortion and birth control because even they knew that a population that doesn't reproduce is a population that will inevitably die off.

Now compare that with our modern-day commies who glorify sickness both physical and mental, as well as encourage people to kill their kids before they're even born.

Stalin would've already made them all face the wall.

Combloc countries also had their fair share of feminists/polygamy/childfree/abortionist people in charge that were destroying their countries from within, it's not the case of 'commies were spreading bad stuff in other countries while prohibiting it in their owns'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandra_Kollontai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Kovrigina
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingeburg_Lange

Early bolsheviks made abortion legal and free. Stalin banned abortions, but after his death the ban was lifted again.

[A Chinese opium den]

big budget games will have a UI that is 98% identical to ever other big budget game on the market with 47 separate people credited under UI design
what the **** are they even doing

They're on welfare, at the expense of gamers.

[Red7]

You know what? I take back everything I said before.
The past has always been better by every possible metric. Violence could solve all your issues without facing consequences, and life would get immediately better if the authorities just let us kill our enemies in peace.
Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

watch out on yer micro aggressions goyim they not legal now

[A Chinese opium den]

You know what? I take back everything I said before.
The past has always been better by every possible metric. Violence could solve all your issues without facing consequences, and life would get immediately better if the authorities just let us kill our enemies in peace.
Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Lol you gay little ******.

[gerey]

They're on welfare, at the expense of gamers.

Corporate adult daycare for shitlib women, the rest of the world footing the bill as they rake in billions doing absolutely nothing.

If this doesn't blackpill you, nothing will.

[Nooneatall]

big budget games will have a UI that is 98% identical to ever other big budget game on the market with 47 separate people credited under UI design
what the **** are they even doing

And they all use ridiculously heavy Javascript GUI engines to display ****. So you are not only running a video game, you are running a videogame + a heavy Javascript rendering engine on top.

[Tangerine]

big budget games will have a UI that is 98% identical to ever other big budget game on the market with 47 separate people credited under UI design
what the **** are they even doing

Arguing about what shade of gray to use for boxes, how much alpha should be on the drop shadows, and what definitely-not-Helvetica font is most readable.

[psychic_dream]

You know what? I take back everything I said before.
The past has always been better by every possible metric. Violence could solve all your issues without facing consequences, and life would get immediately better if the authorities just let us kill our enemies in peace.
Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Don't be sad that you didn't get to experience the golden age of gaming. Just try to improve the world one step at a time within your sphere of influence.

I'm trying to become the best person I can be by helping my immediate family members, sharing useful knowledge with my circle of friends, being a good role model for my nephews, participating in politics in a way that serves my people's interests, and so on.

Now go shoot the nearest school to vent your resentment like the good federal asset that you are.

Your argument is flawed because the left routinely engages in violence, be it physical, financial, political or legal. They use defacto terrorist groups and the power of the state to go after people they dislike, so what option is there left but to reply in kind?

One common issue with cuckservatives is that they want to "play by the rules", instead of wielding institutions like weapons against their political opponents like the liberals do when they gain power over them. It's no wonder the past century has been a near constant retreat against leftist onslaught when one side wages war on all fronts, while the other meekly requests that everyone be civil.

I don’t want to sound defeatist, but they control key institutions: media, academia, public education, tech, and other related sectors. So again, what exactly are you planning to do? Unless there is some sort of collective uprising happening all at once, nothing is going to change in any major way.

If I were in the place of the Irish, I would be willing to help burn down those hotels housing migrants, just to make it clear that the public does not want to accommodate invasive species.

Beyond that, it's outside my range of interests. Most of what you are saying comes off as, “Just grab a gun and shoot the first liberal looking numale or shitigrant you see, or else you are a pussy.” I am not throwing my life away for that. If you are that eager, be my guest.

[gerey]

Beyond that, it's outside my range of interests.

Okay, so you don't care. Why are we having this discussion with you again?

[rusty_shackleford]

So again, what exactly are you planning to do?

just wanted to play video games.webp

Keep pushing right.

[Unhelpful Contrarian]

So again, what exactly are you planning to do?

just wanted to play video games.webp

Keep pushing right.

It’s all futile in the end since absolutely no want to tackle the core underlined issue. It’s not blacks, ****, migrant’s or even communist. No the issue is and will always be women specifically female suffrage.

[rusty_shackleford]

big budget games will have a UI that is 98% identical to ever other big budget game on the market with 47 separate people credited under UI design
what the **** are they even doing

every other $3 billion dollar title's UI:


average indie game made with $50 by 3 people in some garage:



I dare you to guess which of these was designed for mobile devices!