We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/

The GNU/Linux Corner

I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that
User avatar
asf
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 556
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Helicopter

Post by asf »

microsoft is a joke
User avatar
twig
The Only Good Commie
Posts: 80
Joined: Feb 2, '23

Post by twig »

Pipeweed wrote: March 19th, 2024, 15:01
ok let me rephrase the question:
is it possible to get software graphics xorg or wayland on a machine without a gpu?
basically i want to run it in simple framebuffer :rip:
Yes. Just run xvfb. I'm running tests for my gamedev project that way.

Example:
xvfb glxinfo -B
Last edited by twig on April 1st, 2024, 10:56, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
rusty_shackleford
Site Admin
Posts: 10629
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Watermelon
Contact:

Post by rusty_shackleford »

it seems file-roller is no longer maintained and some update broke drag+drop with it, what do you guys use instead?
User avatar
Nemesis
Director of Synchronous Communication Channels
Posts: 513
Joined: Feb 2, '23

Post by Nemesis »

Thunar, the file explorer, compresses when you right-click on a file and save the archive with the extension of your choice, i.e. .tar.gz, .7z, or .zip, using the appropriate tool to compress. It also handles expanding an archive if you click on it.

Otherwise, I use terminal tools: zip/unzip, atool, 7z, tar.
Last edited by Nemesis on April 3rd, 2024, 02:38, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WaterMage
Posts: 332
Joined: Sep 30, '23

Post by WaterMage »

Why so many companies insist in the every day more heavy and bloated launchers?

I don't get it. Origin some years ago used to consume only 36M of RAM. 2011 skyrim launcher used to consume only few MB of RAM too. Nowadays, EA APP consumes over 600M. LAri Launcher for BG3 takes over 800M.

And I don't get. If you just wanna make a launcher to check updates updates, maybe run a mod and an ad, you can make it in less than 150 lines of code in C with SDL. Hell, Heroic Games Launcher which is open source barely consumes 8M and comes with a lot of useful resources. EA APP is giving me a lot of troubles.

To be clear, I'm not complaining. When I first started to use Linux, I used Debian 6 and had a lot of tourble running even older games like Morrowind. Nowadays, I can run over 90% of the games that I wanna flawlessly with no problem. Is only anti cheat and launchers giving me trouble and am creating this thread to see if I can understand why so many proprietary launchers needs to be so heavy and looks like they do everything that they can to make it as hard as possible to run in Linux.
User avatar
rusty_shackleford
Site Admin
Posts: 10629
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Watermelon
Contact:

Post by rusty_shackleford »

WaterMage wrote: April 4th, 2024, 20:41
Why so many companies insist in the every day more heavy and bloated launchers?

I don't get it. Origin some years ago used to consume only 36M of RAM. 2011 skyrim launcher used to consume only few MB of RAM too. Nowadays, EA APP consumes over 600M. LAri Launcher for BG3 takes over 800M.

And I don't get. If you just wanna make a launcher to check updates updates, maybe run a mod and an ad, you can make it in less than 150 lines of code in C with SDL. Hell, Heroic Games Launcher which is open source barely consumes 8M and comes with a lot of useful resources. EA APP is giving me a lot of troubles.

To be clear, I'm not complaining. When I first started to use Linux, I used Debian 6 and had a lot of tourble running even older games like Morrowind. Nowadays, I can run over 90% of the games that I wanna flawlessly with no problem. Is only anti cheat and launchers giving me trouble and am creating this thread to see if I can understand why so many proprietary launchers needs to be so heavy and looks like they do everything that they can to make it as hard as possible to run in Linux.
because they embed chrome
User avatar
asf
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 556
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Helicopter

Post by asf »

chrome is cancer
User avatar
BobT
Posts: 859
Joined: Jan 29, '24
Location: USA
Gender: Potato

Post by BobT »

rusty_shackleford wrote: April 4th, 2024, 20:42
WaterMage wrote: April 4th, 2024, 20:41
Why so many companies insist in the every day more heavy and bloated launchers?

I don't get it. Origin some years ago used to consume only 36M of RAM. 2011 skyrim launcher used to consume only few MB of RAM too. Nowadays, EA APP consumes over 600M. LAri Launcher for BG3 takes over 800M.

And I don't get. If you just wanna make a launcher to check updates updates, maybe run a mod and an ad, you can make it in less than 150 lines of code in C with SDL. Hell, Heroic Games Launcher which is open source barely consumes 8M and comes with a lot of useful resources. EA APP is giving me a lot of troubles.

To be clear, I'm not complaining. When I first started to use Linux, I used Debian 6 and had a lot of tourble running even older games like Morrowind. Nowadays, I can run over 90% of the games that I wanna flawlessly with no problem. Is only anti cheat and launchers giving me trouble and am creating this thread to see if I can understand why so many proprietary launchers needs to be so heavy and looks like they do everything that they can to make it as hard as possible to run in Linux.
because they embed chrome
Yep. It's the only thing that the bootcamp pajeets know how to do.
Even Steam is completely reliant on specific Chrome versions now.
Mass Effect Legendary edition uses a launcher that renders the games unplayable on Windows versions that the original games were released for, lol.
User avatar
SpellSword
Posts: 182
Joined: Jun 15, '23

Post by SpellSword »

Looks like someone was caught placing a backdoor in XZ Utils:
. The XZ Backdoor: Everything You Need to Know (Wired)
. What we know about the xz Utils backdoor that almost infected the world (Ars Technica)
Wired wrote:
What Does the Backdoor Do?

Malicious code added to xz Utils versions 5.6.0 and 5.6.1 modified the way the software functions. The backdoor manipulated sshd, the executable file used to make remote SSH connections. Anyone in possession of a predetermined encryption key could stash any code of their choice in an SSH login certificate, upload it, and execute it on the backdoored device. No one has actually seen code uploaded, so it's not known what code the attacker planned to run. In theory, the code could allow for just about anything, including stealing encryption keys or installing malware.
Ars Technica wrote:
Image
User avatar
asf
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 556
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Helicopter

Post by asf »

Interesting story, chinks spent years trying to bundle the thing in a way that is very hard to detect, their efforts averted only because someone decided to sperg enough about some performance variances in that version. If that can happen even in core linux libraries, imagine what other crap is floating around, specially in a world with infinite 'mandated updates' crap.

It also highlights the stupidity of systemd, linking against everything under the sun is such a good idea.
Last edited by asf on April 6th, 2024, 15:24, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WaterMage
Posts: 332
Joined: Sep 30, '23

Post by WaterMage »

IMO Systemd receive much unnecessary hate.

Wayland I have heard a lot of good things but my first experience with it was no good. After I installed the nvidia driver, this happened >

Image

And I only solved it by changing to X11 in loggin screen
Last edited by WaterMage on May 11th, 2024, 08:19, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rusty_shackleford
Site Admin
Posts: 10629
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Gender: Watermelon
Contact:

Post by rusty_shackleford »

asf wrote: April 6th, 2024, 15:23
Interesting story, chinks spent years trying to bundle the thing in a way that is very hard to detect, their efforts averted only because someone decided to sperg enough about some performance variances in that version. If that can happen even in core linux libraries, imagine what other crap is floating around, specially in a world with infinite 'mandated updates' crap.

It also highlights the stupidity of systemd, linking against everything under the sun is such a good idea.
This wouldn't be an issue if we just banned chinese from the internet.
User avatar
Oyster Sauce
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2192
Joined: Jun 2, '23

Post by Oyster Sauce »

WaterMage wrote: Today, 08:19
IMO Systemd receive much unnecessary hate.

Wayland I have heard a lot of good things but my first experience with it was no good. After I installed the nvidia driver, this happened >

Image

And I only solved it by changing to X11 in loggin screen
Another victim of the IPS gang...
User avatar
Xenich
Posts: 1167
Joined: Feb 24, '24

Post by Xenich »

asf wrote: March 25th, 2024, 20:40
microsoft is a joke
They always have been, but unfortunately they were able to force the gaming market otherwise they would have died out a long time ago.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 585
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

rusty_shackleford wrote: April 4th, 2024, 20:42
WaterMage wrote: April 4th, 2024, 20:41
Why so many companies insist in the every day more heavy and bloated launchers?

I don't get it. Origin some years ago used to consume only 36M of RAM. 2011 skyrim launcher used to consume only few MB of RAM too. Nowadays, EA APP consumes over 600M. LAri Launcher for BG3 takes over 800M.

And I don't get. If you just wanna make a launcher to check updates updates, maybe run a mod and an ad, you can make it in less than 150 lines of code in C with SDL. Hell, Heroic Games Launcher which is open source barely consumes 8M and comes with a lot of useful resources. EA APP is giving me a lot of troubles.

To be clear, I'm not complaining. When I first started to use Linux, I used Debian 6 and had a lot of tourble running even older games like Morrowind. Nowadays, I can run over 90% of the games that I wanna flawlessly with no problem. Is only anti cheat and launchers giving me trouble and am creating this thread to see if I can understand why so many proprietary launchers needs to be so heavy and looks like they do everything that they can to make it as hard as possible to run in Linux.
because they embed chrome
What, you expect me to write a native gui app for every os? I don't even know how to code outside of react... also, how will I embed Spyware and ads for other shitty games without my chrome based 2 gb launcher?
User avatar
WaterMage
Posts: 332
Joined: Sep 30, '23

Post by WaterMage »

Nooneatall wrote: Today, 13:48
What, you expect me to write a native gui app for every os? I don't even know how to code outside of react... also, how will I embed Spyware and ads for other shitty games without my chrome based 2 gb launcher?
You joke, but making GUI nowadays is very easy. We are no longer in times of win32 API where you need to write hundreds of code lines to make an simple screen with a button that run a script once clicked. Nowadays, you can use Qt Creator and visual studio to make a decent GUI in minutes. To other os? Just use qmake and recompile it or use python and tkinter.

GoG installer if I remember correctly was made in Java. For ads to another games, you can easily use WebView from Java Fx. No need to load a entire browser for it.
Xenich wrote: Today, 13:08
They always have been, but unfortunately they were able to force the gaming market otherwise they would have died out a long time ago.
YES!!

And the tendency is that they will become worse and worse, while open source better and better.

Why? WEF DIE/ESG agenda.

They will have more and more diversity hires working in their system. And more and more blackrock pressuring for telemetry, spyware, bloatware, etc. Meanwhile, people who work in free source projects, being paid or not have a more meritocratic system. Even if the main Linux kernel development becomes flooded with incompetent diversity hires, anyone can fork the pre DIE Linux and continue the development from there. And everyone will use it.

You can`t force behavior using Larry Fink own words in Linux users own computers.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 585
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

WaterMage wrote: Today, 17:03
Nooneatall wrote: Today, 13:48
What, you expect me to write a native gui app for every os? I don't even know how to code outside of react... also, how will I embed Spyware and ads for other shitty games without my chrome based 2 gb launcher?
You joke, but making GUI nowadays is very easy. We are no longer in times of win32 API where you need to write hundreds of code lines to make an simple screen with a button that run a script once clicked. Nowadays, you can use Qt Creator and visual studio to make a decent GUI in minutes. To other os? Just use qmake and recompile it or use python and tkinter.

GoG installer if I remember correctly was made in Java. For ads to another games, you can easily use WebView from Java Fx. No need to load a entire browser for it.
Xenich wrote: Today, 13:08
They always have been, but unfortunately they were able to force the gaming market otherwise they would have died out a long time ago.
YES!!

And the tendency is that they will become worse and worse, while open source better and better.

Why? WEF DIE/ESG agenda.

They will have more and more diversity hires working in their system. And more and more blackrock pressuring for telemetry, spyware, bloatware, etc. Meanwhile, people who work in free source projects, being paid or not have a more meritocratic system. Even if the main Linux kernel development becomes flooded with incompetent diversity hires, anyone can fork the pre DIE Linux and continue the development from there. And everyone will use it.

You can`t force behavior using Larry Fink own words in Linux users own computers.
But then I have to learn something that isn't an extremely convoluted js framework. And qt isn't reactive, functional, and it doesn't have hooks. Compiling something is scary (better to run my code through an extremely complicated process of transpilation and packing it so it works on electron)
User avatar
Decline
Posts: 635
Joined: Mar 29, '23

Post by Decline »

Xenich wrote: Today, 13:08
They always have been, but unfortunately they were able to force the gaming market otherwise they would have died out a long time ago.
Were?

The decline of gaming from its pinnacle in late 90s is exclusively due to microsoft money going into XBAWKS exclusives to the detriment of everything else, even microsofts own studios (MS housed excellent strategy game studios in the late 90s, sadly none of these can be played with a controller on an XBAWKS so they had to die).
Post Reply