YouTube censors presidential candidate RFK Jr; removes interview video

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » June 20th, 2023, 12:04

Atlantico · Post by **Atlantico** » June 20th, 2023, 12:28

What is a "harmful message"?

That is a meaningless term. Definitely don't support morons who are basically irrelevant, but still are determined to be absolute faggots. Fuck rumble.

(while not written, fuck Google/Youtube is taken as read)

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » June 20th, 2023, 12:33

Atlantico wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2023, 12:28
What is a "harmful message"?

It's effectively a way to write a terms of service that seems like a list of conditions but is actually open to complete interpretation giving them freedom to terminate your access at their leisure.

Without this, they open themselves up to lawsuits when they decide they don't want 'icky' content on their platform due to people using content creation as a source of income.

wndrbr · Post by **wndrbr** » June 20th, 2023, 12:35

Why are they censoring this guy? Isn't he some kind of kook who has zero chances of challenging any other candidate?

Seems very counterintuitive.

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » June 20th, 2023, 13:11

wndrbr wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2023, 12:35
Why are they censoring this guy? Isn't he some kind of kook who has zero chances of challenging any other candidate?

Seems very counterintuitive.

So, this takes a bit of explaining.
Media's preferred spin on anti-vaxx has always been that it's the "kooky right-wing nutters", but the data has never backed those claims up, except possibly until recently due to the different nature of the coof vaccine.

The anti-vaxx on the right was basically the libertarians(rather small % overall), on the left it was more of something that was acknowledged as a dirty secret but not discussed e.g., this 2014 MotherJones article explaining how "climate denial" is much worse than libtards disapproving of vaccines/GMO: https://www.motherjones.com/environment ... -vaccines/
See also this CURRENT YEAR MAN video scolding libtards for being anti-vaxx: https://www.cc.com/video/g1lev1/the-dai ... ral-idiocy

RFK Jr's views are very much in line with a large section of the libtard population, including blacks who are just anti-science in general. Think of people like Steve Jobs, who didn't bathe and tried to cure cancer by eating fruit. Yuppies.

Essentially, there's a reason you have people like Jack Dorsey endorsing RFK Jr.

Emphyrio · Post by **Emphyrio** » June 20th, 2023, 13:54

I wonder if the censorship of RFK intersects with election law.

GhostCow · Post by **GhostCow** » June 20th, 2023, 15:05

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2023, 12:04
YouTube Censors Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

HQ strongly recommends against using YouTube for new video uploads.
After a review of terms, HQ also strongly recommends against using Rumble for new video uploads.
https://rumble.com/s/terms
You may not post or transmit any message which is abusive, inciting violence, harassing, harmful, hateful, anti-semitic, racist or threatening.
Odysee is the preferred HQ platform for uploading new videos.

Odyssey banned Black Crimes Matter. It feels weird saying this, but it seems like Twitter is the least likely place to delete a video out of the majors. Gab also has video hosting at Gab.tv and does not censor.

Acrux · Post by **Acrux** » June 20th, 2023, 15:59

Emphyrio wrote: ↑ June 20th, 2023, 13:54
I wonder if the censorship of RFK intersects with election law.

The_Mask · Post by **The_Mask** » July 27th, 2023, 20:16

Same guy. Different interview:

Post by **WhiteShark** » July 27th, 2023, 20:34

How about BitChute? Here's their prohibited content section: https://support.bitchute.com/policy/gui ... ed-content
There's a part about 'Incitement to Hatred', but that only applies in the UK and and EU. Other than that I didn't see anything too bad.

Atlantico · Post by **Atlantico** » July 27th, 2023, 23:17

WhiteShark wrote: ↑ July 27th, 2023, 20:34
How about BitChute? Here's their prohibited content section: https://support.bitchute.com/policy/gui ... ed-content
There's a part about 'Incitement to Hatred', but that only applies in the UK and and EU. Other than that I didn't see anything too bad.

BitchUte more like it. Great. Apart from their censoring.

Thor Kaufman · Post by **Thor Kaufman** » July 29th, 2023, 17:05

Bitchute glows. Was founded by MI5. Odysee is cool still.

@OP Just gotta v000000te harder. Your vote never mattered. Never will. The presidents who are just meaningless figureheads anyway get decided upon. It's all fake and gay. Always has been.
And fuck RFK, fucking faggot.

KnightoftheWind · Post by **KnightoftheWind** » July 29th, 2023, 23:02

Thor Kaufman wrote: ↑ July 29th, 2023, 17:05
Bitchute glows. Was founded by MI5. Odysee is cool still.

@OP Just gotta v000000te harder. Your vote never mattered. Never will. The presidents who are just meaningless figureheads anyway get decided upon. It's all fake and gay. Always has been.
And fuck RFK, fucking faggot.