We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/
The Whatever Pops in your Head Thread
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
how much would we have to pay you to go live there?
- Oyster Sauce
- Turtle
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Jun 2, '23
- Gender: Dinosaur
I'd visit the tea girl and have a great timerusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 16th, 2024, 23:39how much would we have to pay you to go live there?
A life where you get a free gook wife and get to star as the villain in propaganda movies is something a lot of niggas on here would pay for.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 16th, 2024, 23:39how much would we have to pay you to go live there?
North Korea doesn't get jew money, that's why they are poor.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
maybe north korea is poor because communism is retarded
North Korea isn't communist, it's just a ruse. It's in fact a theocratic dynasty.
Do you view China as a communist country?rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:06maybe north korea is poor because communism is retarded
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
It is communist. It's a command economy with a country full of workers collectives.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:08North Korea isn't communist, it's just a ruse. It's in fact a theocratic dynasty.
China is a mixed economy. What does this have to do with north korea?
And monarchies were what?rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:16It is communist. It's a command economy with a country full of workers collectives.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:08North Korea isn't communist, it's just a ruse. It's in fact a theocratic dynasty.
Thinking there's only "capitalism" or "communism" (both invented by jews btw, what a coincidence!) is buying jew propaganda.
If you care to analyse well you'll see North Korea has everything similar to a historic asian dynasty.
Last edited by Anon on April 17th, 2024, 00:18, edited 1 time in total.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
"were"?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:17And monarchies were what?rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:16It is communist. It's a command economy with a country full of workers collectives.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:08North Korea isn't communist, it's just a ruse. It's in fact a theocratic dynasty.
Thinking there's only "capitalism" or "communism" (both invented by jews btw, what a coincidence!) is buying jew propaganda.
There's capitalist monarchies right now.
I obviously mean traditional monarchies, before liberalism and communism were a thing. The king commanded the economy and there were workers collectives (guilds), similar to castes, how it is in North Korea nowadays.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:18"were"?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:17And monarchies were what?rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:16
It is communist. It's a command economy with a country full of workers collectives.
Thinking there's only "capitalism" or "communism" (both invented by jews btw, what a coincidence!) is buying jew propaganda.
There's capitalist monarchies right now.
In communism regimes there would be a party commitee electing the next leader. Only in North Korea you have the figure of a supreme leader whose progeny inherits the government. Similar to... a dynasty.
Last edited by Anon on April 17th, 2024, 00:21, edited 2 times in total.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
You mean feudalism.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:19I obviously mean traditional monarchies, before liberalism and communism were a thing. The king commanded the economy and there were workers collectives (guilds)rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:18"were"?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:17
And monarchies were what?
Thinking there's only "capitalism" or "communism" (both invented by jews btw, what a coincidence!) is buying jew propaganda.
There's capitalist monarchies right now.
Communism is explicitly anti-feudalism.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
Communist regimes where the leader was actually elected:Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:19n communism regimes there would be a party commitee electing the next leader.
Last edited by rusty_shackleford on April 17th, 2024, 00:23, edited 1 time in total.
It isn't exactly feudalism as well, the asians developed different societies to the europeans, trying to mirror them to what we know of european history isn't seeing it precisely. North Korea is something nearer to what Japan was pre second world war I guess. But the point is that North Korea is effectively a dynasty and they maintain this communism ruse because they needed USSR and China to maintain their government and still needs China and Russia, and it's way more convenient to call itself communist than a dynasty of course.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:21You mean feudalism.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:19I obviously mean traditional monarchies, before liberalism and communism were a thing. The king commanded the economy and there were workers collectives (guilds)
Communism is explicitly anti-feudalism.
None of them are/were an inheritance system like North Korea. Kim Jong Un is already preparing his sister to succeed him btw, like an effective royal family.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:22Communist regimes where the leader was actually elected:Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:19n communism regimes there would be a party commitee electing the next leader.
Last edited by Anon on April 17th, 2024, 00:31, edited 2 times in total.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
In what ways aren't they communist?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:28It isn't exactly feudalism as well, the asians developed different societies to the europeans, trying to mirror them to what we know of european history isn't seeing it precisely. North Korea is something nearer to what Japan was pre second world war I guess. But the point is that North Korea is effectively a dynasty and they maintain this communism ruse because they needed USSR and China to maintain their government and still needs China and Russia, and it's way more convenient to call itself communist than a dynasty of course.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:21You mean feudalism.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:19
I obviously mean traditional monarchies, before liberalism and communism were a thing. The king commanded the economy and there were workers collectives (guilds)
Communism is explicitly anti-feudalism.
"electing a leader" is not part of communism.
If you want to say they're not strictly following Marxist-Lenninist style of communism, then, fine. But they've branded their own ideology as Juche communism("Socialism of Our Style"). Any criticisms of them not being "troo communists" come down to communism just not working in reality.
Just curious since you consider North Korea still communist I was wondering if you extended that to China as well. If you did I would probably make some faggy gotcha response about that image showing China as well lit up at night.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:16China is a mixed economy. What does this have to do with north korea?
North Korea has removed all instances of communism from it's constitution and has been liberalizing their economy over the past decade or so although admittedly not as much as China. At least they're toning down the communism larp unlike China.
In every communist regimes as far as I know the leaders are elected by a central party commitee, not in a typical democracy like you're thinking but it's still an election, and if you care to see well none of them had their family inherit the government ad eternum. Except North Korea.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:31In what ways aren't they communist?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:28It isn't exactly feudalism as well, the asians developed different societies to the europeans, trying to mirror them to what we know of european history isn't seeing it precisely. North Korea is something nearer to what Japan was pre second world war I guess. But the point is that North Korea is effectively a dynasty and they maintain this communism ruse because they needed USSR and China to maintain their government and still needs China and Russia, and it's way more convenient to call itself communist than a dynasty of course.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:21
You mean feudalism.
Communism is explicitly anti-feudalism.
"electing a leader" is not part of communism.
If you want to say they're not strictly following Marxist-Lenninist style of communism, then, fine. But they've branded their own ideology as Juche communism("Socialism of Our Style"). Any criticisms of them not being "troo communists" come down to communism just not working in reality.
As I said, it's a ruse.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20210601170100504Vergil wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:34North Korea has removed all instances of communism from it's constitution
They just cut out the middleman. Arguing over how the leader is picked to attempt to refute that they're communist seems like grasping at straws to me. Exactly what nations that exist right now would you consider to be closer to akshual communism than north korea?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:34In every communist regimes as far as I know the leaders are elected by a central party commitee, not in a typical democracy like you're thinking but it's still an election, and if you care to see well none of them had their family inherit the government ad eternum. Except North Korea.
As I said, it's a ruse.
Might as well start saying America isn't a capitalist nation. Because it's not, it's a mixed economy.
Last edited by rusty_shackleford on April 17th, 2024, 00:40, edited 1 time in total.
If I had to guess I'd say Cuba. But honestly I think communism is ded (it was never alive honestly, it was always just a jew ruse) and what we see nowadays are just LARPers adapting how they can to survive against the jews.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:40https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20210601170100504Vergil wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:34North Korea has removed all instances of communism from it's constitution
They just cut out the middleman. Arguing over how the leader is picked to attempt to refute that they're communist seems like grasping at straws to me. Exactly what nations that exist right now would you consider to be closer to akshual communism than north korea?Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:34In every communist regimes as far as I know the leaders are elected by a central party commitee, not in a typical democracy like you're thinking but it's still an election, and if you care to see well none of them had their family inherit the government ad eternum. Except North Korea.
As I said, it's a ruse.
Might as well start saying America isn't a capitalist nation. Because it's not, it's a mixed economy.
Last edited by Anon on April 17th, 2024, 00:42, edited 1 time in total.
Basically none except maybe Cuba (I don't know much about how the modern Cuban government is run). Communism is a borderline extinct and geopolitically irrelevant ideology that died it's death in the 20th century.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:40Exactly what nations that exist right now would you consider to be closer to akshual communism than north korea?
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
Cuba allows private ownership of businesses. The only private corporation that operates in north korea I'm aware of is a joint cooperation with a foreign company to provide cellphone service.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:42If I had to guess I'd say Cuba. But honestly I think communism is ded (it was never alive honestly, it was always just a jew ruse) and what we see nowadays are just LARPers adapting how they can to survive against the jews.
Thanks for saying the same thing I did using different wordsVergil wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:50Basically none except maybe Cuba (I don't know much about how the modern Cuban government is run). Communism is a borderline extinct and geopolitically irrelevant ideology that died it's death in the 20th century.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:40Exactly what nations that exist right now would you consider to be closer to akshual communism than north korea?
Sure, I mean more in a holistic sense (government, society, also economy etc). Under a purely economic standpoint any absolutist medieval monarchy would've been considered communist as well. But as I said communism is just dedrusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:51Cuba allows private ownership of businesses. The only private corporation that operates in north korea I'm aware of is a joint cooperation with a foreign company to provide cellphone service.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 00:42If I had to guess I'd say Cuba. But honestly I think communism is ded (it was never alive honestly, it was always just a jew ruse) and what we see nowadays are just LARPers adapting how they can to survive against the jews.
Last edited by Anon on April 17th, 2024, 01:01, edited 1 time in total.
- rusty_shackleford
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10449
- Joined: Feb 2, '23
- Gender: Watermelon
- Contact:
Feudalist societies were not command economies. They were much closer to modern mixed economies than North Korea's economy.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 01:01Under a purely economic standpoint any absolutist medieval monarchy would've been considered communist as well.
The main difference in feudalism to modern mixed economies would be the exchange of land for service, obviously.
Last edited by rusty_shackleford on April 17th, 2024, 01:06, edited 1 time in total.
I think you're overestimating the government control over individual lives. In North Korea the economy is planned and under the state's control, but in an individual level people can choose what they want to do with their lives.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 01:04Feudalist societies were not command economies. They were much closer to modern mixed economies than North Korea's economy.Anon wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 01:01Under a purely economic standpoint any absolutist medieval monarchy would've been considered communist as well.
Was writing my post before yours existed and I didn't read yours anyway.
I know it was a coincidence, but I couldn't not notice it and mention it , especially considering this is a rather unusual takeVergil wrote: ↑ April 17th, 2024, 01:11Was writing my post before yours existed and I didn't read yours anyway.
Last edited by Anon on April 17th, 2024, 01:14, edited 3 times in total.
I'm built different, I'm him.
Rape. The final frontier.
Finally some rape appreciation in this forum.Vergil wrote: ↑ April 16th, 2024, 21:40>that's man-made, and one experiences it only when you return to earth
So are laws against rape you stupid bitch now assume the position