maidenhaver wrote: ↑
September 1st, 2023, 12:01
Humbaba wrote: ↑
September 1st, 2023, 09:37
maidenhaver wrote: ↑
August 31st, 2023, 21:17
They're good insofar as they're the main character, and its only their perspective that matters. I hate the god emperor kinds of mary sue, and how they're always depicted as stoical, to the point he's stuck in a high seat. Reddit's version of god.
That makes them the protagonist and the protagonist doesn't have to be good. The Emperor is explicitly not a mary sue, since he's depicted as a massive asshole and space communist, whose grand vision utterly failed and who's been stuck in a really painful coma for ten thousand years. Again, midwits see le ebin golden god emprah and think WOW COOL GOLD MAN. 40k haters adopt this view uncritically and come to the conclusion that the setting is bad.
No, there's no narrative, so they aren't protagonists. What's meant by Good is up to perspective, not objective moral truth. You're also lying to yourself if you think that a god emperor isn't a mary sue in a high chair. 40K is a setting that only gets worse the more that's explained, so ignoring all that dumb fluff shit's the only real option. It would have been better without aliens and superpowers.
I agree up until you call the God-Emperor a Mary Sue. The God-Emperor was never a self-insert of any kind, and was conceived as a spin on Frank Herbert's
God-Emperor of Dune and the Mule of the
Foundation Trilogy by Asimov. He didn't become le heckin' atheist superman until long, long after Priestley's conception, and the idea of him as a Mary Sue is entirely a consequence of things like the Horus Heresy book series, which has embedded itself in the setting as a demythologizing and capeshit-spawning cancer, cementing the transformation of WH40k into nu41k.
There's literally nothing wrong with the God-Emperor as originally conceived in the static narrative of the setting, namely as an icon of worship and an effectively absent central figure of a feudal structure that has collapsed in on itself, with a mythological past that was far less glorious than the legend it built. By Priestley's own statements, the Primarchs may or may not have been created by the Emperor, but they weren't five meter tall supermen, but mortal same as any space marine, and then the legend grew over time - and similarly, the Emperor was a supremely gifted psyker, but it was always hinted that the idea of him as this perfect being of light and good was a psychic projection he imposed upon those around him (i.e. for those familiar with Asimov, essentially the Mule).
At its core it's a timeline gone wrong, and the God-Emperor, insofar that he was an actual character at all (he wasn't conceived as such; he's a set-piece and a literary device by design, much like the Dark Age of Technology, the Primarchs, and more) was a tragic figure, not a Mary Sue, and the Imperium itself is absolutely 'good' in that it is the best humanity can do and have to offer, and that every concession made has been made in the interest of humanity because this is a universe in which this is the best we can do with the tools that we have - a common motif in the core material that influenced the setting to begin with, such as
2000 AD.
When it comes to Warhammer, we really need to institute a logic of reverse-release canonicity, where older sources hold a higher place in determining canon than newer pieces, because everything produced by James in the last decade has been an unmitigated disaster regarding everything that actually made the setting(s) good or even worthwhile to begin with.