Higher Quality
https://rpghq.org/forums/
It's already up on multiple torrent sites if anyone is feeling adventurous. I will, of course, not download it.Segata Sanshiro wrote: ↑ March 7th, 2023, 21:45
Reviews are in: it runs like fucking shit apparently. Very Negative at this moment
Modding UE4/5 games is painful. Slightly less so if they have blueprints('visual scripting'), but still nowhere near as easy as a Unity game.
Yeah, Obsidian already tanked their reputation with the base Outer Worlds!.Roguey wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 14:40Obsidian must be seething that Private Division is tanking their reputation with this lazy, counterproductive remaster. They should petition to have their name removed as a developer so it's just credited to Virtuos.
It sold millions and has a good Steam user score (though the $10 remaster has resulted in quite a number of recent downvotes), so I'd say not.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 14:53Yeah, Obsidian already tanked their reputation with the base Outer Worlds!.
Oh I don't care if it's "popular", that doesn't make it a quality game in it's own right. The game is filled to the brim with poz, and it's visuals are nauseating.Roguey wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 16:59It sold millions and has a good Steam user score (though the $10 remaster has resulted in quite a number of recent downvotes), so I'd say not.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 14:53Yeah, Obsidian already tanked their reputation with the base Outer Worlds!.
Ah fair enough, so it isn't reflective of a lack of interest among their community but a consequence of the engine itself.rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 13:28Modding UE4/5 games is painful. Slightly less so if they have blueprints('visual scripting'), but still nowhere near as easy as a Unity game.
I don't think you understand what reputation means.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 17:37Oh I don't care if it's "popular", that doesn't make it a quality game in it's own right. The game is filled to the brim with poz, and it's visuals are nauseating.Roguey wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 16:59It sold millions and has a good Steam user score (though the $10 remaster has resulted in quite a number of recent downvotes), so I'd say not.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 14:53Yeah, Obsidian already tanked their reputation with the base Outer Worlds!.
Marvel films have a positive reputation, does that make them inherently good films?. Do not confuse mass appeal for genuine quality.Roguey wrote: ↑ March 9th, 2023, 00:49I don't think you understand what reputation means.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 17:37Oh I don't care if it's "popular", that doesn't make it a quality game in it's own right. The game is filled to the brim with poz, and it's visuals are nauseating.Roguey wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 16:59
It sold millions and has a good Steam user score (though the $10 remaster has resulted in quite a number of recent downvotes), so I'd say not.
If you check the comments on reddit and other vidya-related forums, you'll see how the opinion has shifted for the worse since release. Even the normies feel lukewarm at best, lots of posters complain how Obsidian has declined and how their current output can't be compared to the games they were churning out a decade ago.Roguey wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 16:59It sold millions and has a good Steam user score (though the $10 remaster has resulted in quite a number of recent downvotes), so I'd say not.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 14:53Yeah, Obsidian already tanked their reputation with the base Outer Worlds!.
Eh, internet forums represent vocal minorities but not necessarily consensus.wndrbr wrote: ↑ March 9th, 2023, 01:19If you check the comments on reddit and other vidya-related forums, you'll see how the opinion has shifted for the worse since release. Even the normies feel lukewarm at best, lots of posters complain how Obsidian has declined and how their current output can't be compared to the games they were churning out a decade ago.
If you check newsposts about Obsidian's possible involvement in the potential New Vegas sequel, you can see commenters claiming that they don't expect anything good after playing TOW.
I get what you're saying and I'm sure Roguey does too, but you did start off this chain talking about reputation, not quality:KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 9th, 2023, 00:58Marvel films have a positive reputation, does that make them inherently good films?. Do not confuse mass appeal for genuine quality.
TOW was apparently popular, sadly. The remaster is a much worse hit to Obsdidian's reputation.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ March 8th, 2023, 14:53Yeah, Obsidian already tanked their reputation with the base Outer Worlds!.
The early seasons of R+M were occasionally funny and witty. TOW is not. In fact the "funniest" joke in the game is a toilet full of peepee poopoo.KnightoftheWind wrote: ↑ February 28th, 2023, 21:12Outer Worlds is the Rick and Morty of RPGs, in other words- shit.
You realize games today are always online. Don't you?Kalin wrote: ↑ March 9th, 2023, 10:36Exhilarating to see a remaster of the masterpiece that made world history being the first game ever to censor the word Pakistani. That and 1000 other "bad" words from the PC list straight from ADL of insensitive character names a person must not input (never mind it being single player).
I just run my games in firejail with networking disabled.Atlantico wrote: ↑ March 9th, 2023, 13:03You realize games today are always online. Don't you?Kalin wrote: ↑ March 9th, 2023, 10:36Exhilarating to see a remaster of the masterpiece that made world history being the first game ever to censor the word Pakistani. That and 1000 other "bad" words from the PC list straight from ADL of insensitive character names a person must not input (never mind it being single player).
Single player lmao you're always being watched, your inputs registered.
