Hope Ed makes his way towards this site eventually
@Wife Scholar
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 27th, 2023, 21:45
by rusty_shackleford
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 27th, 2023, 22:07
by KnightoftheWind
Some of his "reviews" are longer than most feature-length films. Honestly looking back, I wish YouTube had kept their 15-minute runtime policy. Without it we just get needlessly bloated content like this.
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 28th, 2023, 01:00
by Tweed
Video essayists were a mistake.
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 28th, 2023, 01:04
by Dead
His reviews are good quality. Don't know why his reviews should be in quotation marks.
His reviews are good quality. Don't know why his reviews should be in quotation marks.
When was the last time you watched a movie review that went on longer than the movie itself?
They're documentaries, not reviews.
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 28th, 2023, 04:25
by Dead
Documentaries can be reviews.
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 28th, 2023, 08:52
by GothGirlSupremacy
Five hour reviews is why bullying is so important to the world.
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 30th, 2023, 16:05
by Wife Scholar
He sounds cute
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 30th, 2023, 21:02
by rusty_shackleford
I complained to Ed about this and he still hasn't fixed it.
I ≠ | you barbarian
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 30th, 2023, 21:11
by The_Mask
Crimson Skies was one of those titles that I wanted to play back in the day, but I never got around to because I wasted an evening playing Q3 Arena or Broodwar with the buddies.
I ought to give it a shot before I die.
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 30th, 2023, 22:12
by rusty_shackleford
The crimson skies video touches on one of the more interesting parts of board game/tabletop game companies in the 90s: their ridiculous search for new markets to expand to instead of being content with their current customer base.
Who the hell thought this was an acceptable use of resources?
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: March 30th, 2023, 23:58
by Dead
It looks like game developers in the 90s were regularly taking large doses of lysergic acid diethylamide. I wish developers were this ambitious today.
The crimson skies video touches on one of the more interesting parts of board game/tabletop game companies in the 90s: their ridiculous search for new markets to expand to instead of being content with their current customer base.
Who the hell thought this was an acceptable use of resources?
The later versions of those cabinets looked awesome.
I complained to Ed about this and he still hasn't fixed it.
I ≠ | you barbarian
Looks fine on YouTube, try upgrading your RAM
The retro reviews of MrEdders123
Posted: April 3rd, 2023, 10:51
by rusty_shackleford
re: flight-stick in manual:
Microsoft used to be in the gaming peripheral business, including flight sticks. Not surprising they'd use the manual to plug something they also sell. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SideWinder
re: flight-stick in manual:
Microsoft used to be in the gaming peripheral business, including flight sticks. Not surprising they'd use the manual to plug something they also sell. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SideWinder
It was called the "Angel Series 3" in the manual but there wasn't much info on that model.
Not true, I watched part of the Descent to Undermountain video! It was very informative and made the game look so cool that I was terribly disappointed at the twist reveal that the game is unplayably buggy.