We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/

This meme makes me want to play Helldivers 2

No RPG elements? It probably goes here!
User avatar
Segata
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 1662
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Location: Sega Saturn, Shiro!
Gender: Watermelon

Post by Segata »

Even 1/10 landwhales will have an army of simps behind them in these dark times, your anecdote means nothing.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 545
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:35
Nammu Archag wrote: April 15th, 2024, 17:20
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:25
I know that I'm attractive to many men
hoeflation is outrageous these days
Well I've rejected most of those men lol. I just acknowledge that I fit some of the beauty standards that men find attractive. Attratcion doesn't equal to action.
Tell yourself whatever lies you need to.
Last edited by Nooneatall on April 17th, 2024, 16:40, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Xenich wrote: April 15th, 2024, 18:13
TKVNC wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:57
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:25
I don't want to reject beauty btw. But I think it's a subjective thing. For example, I know that I'm attractive to many men, but some men have rejected me because I'm not their type. And that's okay. I don't find all men/women attractive either.
I'm not saying you are, but then I'm not surprised a woman can't understand how averages and outliers work. Regardless, Slopdivers using the same model for both Sexes is textbook woke. orin put it pretty well:
orinEsque wrote: April 9th, 2024, 16:08
Erasing the female form is a direct attack on women by troons that can never have it.
I am also conflicted on the idea of subjective beauty - as I would argue certain opinions are demonstrable wrong, or the work of a corrupted mind. I will not go into much detail in this regard, as it opens the gateway to semantics, and pointless argumentation -- the short, and more interesting view, I would propose, is that the idea of 'subjective' beauty is a woke tool, employed to convince people that you cannot shame a view that is not commonly held, because, it's just like your opinion man. However, for nearly all of human history, certain standards have remained constant.
Yep... Terms like symmetry, consonance, etc... are all terms used to describe those standards you mention. Most people find such things pleasing being of that nature (ie shapes, sound, and colors), establishing it as the normality of the human perception. The contrast to them are established as such throughout history of various arts. One can certainly say they individually find asymmetry, dissonant sounds, or clashing colors appealing, but it is not because they are "pleasing" generally, as a rule, but more of an individual taste to which they subjectively established due to various reasons.

Ugly people are not "beautiful", they are homely due to the many factual aspects of their makeup. One can go against the grain and claim otherwise, but it would be as "normal" as claiming you like to put your appendage up the shit hole of another, it isn't just a different taste, it is a complete contradiction to the basis of human evaluation and practice.

The entire movement to promote fat, ugly, and clashing somehow as subjective is nothing more than the insane trying to convince the sane they are abnormal.

All of this goes back to the failed ideology of "relativism" which is the tool used by the abnormal to convince the world it is normal.

In the end, it is just another mentally ill person failing to cope with reality and because of such illness, they see nothing wrong with trying to change the reality of the entire world, rather than just accepting the truth of their place in it. Those types eventually will promote the destruction of those who do not share their qualities because they can never hide from this fact, hence the decimation of such standards throughout the industries.
What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
User avatar
Acrux
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2064
Joined: Feb 8, '23

Post by Acrux »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 545
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
She's probably like 300+ lbs. I bet she's eating ice cream and skittles right now.
User avatar
A Chinese opium den
Posts: 334
Joined: Dec 6, '23

Post by A Chinese opium den »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
You were born that way for a reason, what is good is beautiful what is bad is ugly. Simple as simple is. This is why makeup and plastic surgery is evil and a tool for women and jews btw, obfuscating your uglyness to trick someone just shows your poor character.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Anon wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:46
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:21
Anon wrote: April 9th, 2024, 21:21


And guess what, the large majority of the women (of any ethnicity btw) LOVE barbie. Go figure...
You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.
Which flaws do you see in Barbie? Imo she represents the feminine universe extremely well. And the "oh but you're a man" card can't be pulled considering her massive feminine fanbase.
I think the flaws are just stuff that doesn't make sense for me as a subjective thing. Like I'll be thinking where her organs go since her waist is too thin.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 545
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
I can't believe how ugly and fat you are, it's crazy. No wonder you are on this board larping as a lesbian no man would touch you.
User avatar
Oyster Sauce
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2132
Joined: Jun 2, '23
Gender: Dinosaur

Post by Oyster Sauce »

*woman posts for the first time in a week*
*thread instantly gets 40 replies*

Frig off. Some of us are bothered when we have unread threads
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Nooneatall wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:47
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42


Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
I can't believe how ugly and fat you are, it's crazy. No wonder you are on this board larping as a lesbian no man would touch you.
And I can't believe how you think I care. You have no evidence and you're just projecting your sexism and insecurities on me. Get a life.
User avatar
Acrux
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2064
Joined: Feb 8, '23

Post by Acrux »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
Fuck off. I hate porn.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:59
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:21
Anon wrote: April 9th, 2024, 21:21


And guess what, the large majority of the women (of any ethnicity btw) LOVE barbie. Go figure...
You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.
Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.
I didn't say pretty women shouldn't exist in media. They can and should exist. I just told about my own personal preferences.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 545
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:51
Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:59
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:21


You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.
Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.
I didn't say pretty women shouldn't exist in media. They can and should exist. I just told about my own personal preferences.
No one cares what women think
User avatar
Irenaeus
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sep 29, '23

Post by Irenaeus »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:35
I just acknowledge that I fit some of the beauty standards that men find attractive.
What's your bra size?
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 01:15
ArcaneLurker wrote: April 16th, 2024, 01:05
Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:59
Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.
:scratch: The AI pfp looks pretty ugly already. Mid at best.
Its a modded version of Clara from the Beamdog BG2.

Still has pretty, smell and perky nose and with big eyes and simmetrical facial features, with a heartshaped ratio of cheekbones and chin.


You know who also has those facial features?

Yup, none other than Ms. "Unrealistic Beauty Standard" herself, Malibu Barbie!

So, she wants to use an avatar of a pretty woman while crying about videogame characters being "unrealistic supermodels".

Its OK when she gets to LARP as a pretty women. Its everyone else that can't have pretty character models.

*Sighs*. Did you read it when I said that other people can play as pretty super model women for all I care? I was talking about my own personal prefences. Also. I don't know Clara's character. I used her pfp because I was like "ok this looks fine I'll use this" because her looks remind me of my dnd character.
User avatar
Anon
Posts: 1852
Joined: Jan 6, '24
Gender: Lemon

Post by Anon »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:45
Anon wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:46
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:21


You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.
Which flaws do you see in Barbie? Imo she represents the feminine universe extremely well. And the "oh but you're a man" card can't be pulled considering her massive feminine fanbase.
I think the flaws are just stuff that doesn't make sense for me as a subjective thing. Like I'll be thinking where her organs go since her waist is too thin.
There are plenty women with thin waist. Thinning waist using corsets was a common practice in victorian era, because it's a feature that both women and men find pleasing to look and have.

Btw what's your purpose of posting in this forum? What do you expect to obtain here? I've been intrigued.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Anon wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:58
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:45
Anon wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:46


Which flaws do you see in Barbie? Imo she represents the feminine universe extremely well. And the "oh but you're a man" card can't be pulled considering her massive feminine fanbase.
I think the flaws are just stuff that doesn't make sense for me as a subjective thing. Like I'll be thinking where her organs go since her waist is too thin.
There are plenty women with thin waist. Thinning waist using corsets was a common practice in victorian era, because it's a feature that both women and men find pleasing to look and have.

Btw what's your purpose of posting in this forum? What do you expect to obtain here? I've been intrigued.
I posted that to have a conversation. I'm very full aware some people will try to mock and troll me, so that was expected. I'm mostly just laughing at it.

Also I know that plenty of women with thin waists, I meant the uncannily thin waist that's not possible with organs.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:51
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42


Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
Fuck off. I hate porn.
Well so do I. I'm sorry, my bad.
User avatar
Vergil
Posts: 3372
Joined: Sep 6, '23

Post by Vergil »

Group of people who allegedly hate women and their attention seeking behavior bump another thread of a woman's attention seeking behavior for multiple pages :D
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 545
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

Vergil wrote: April 17th, 2024, 17:04
Group of people who allegedly hate women and their attention seeking behavior bump another thread of a woman's attention seeking behavior for multiple pages :D
Looks like another woman is getting jealous
User avatar
Anon
Posts: 1852
Joined: Jan 6, '24
Gender: Lemon

Post by Anon »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 17:01
Anon wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:58
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:45


I think the flaws are just stuff that doesn't make sense for me as a subjective thing. Like I'll be thinking where her organs go since her waist is too thin.
There are plenty women with thin waist. Thinning waist using corsets was a common practice in victorian era, because it's a feature that both women and men find pleasing to look and have.

Btw what's your purpose of posting in this forum? What do you expect to obtain here? I've been intrigued.
I posted that to have a conversation. I'm very full aware some people will try to mock and troll me, so that was expected. I'm mostly just laughing at it.

Also I know that plenty of women with thin waists, I meant the uncannily thin waist that's not possible with organs.
► Show Spoiler
This is a traditional barbie doll. Thin waist but definitely enough to fit organs.

Some real women with thin waist for comparison:

► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Xenich
Posts: 1112
Joined: Feb 24, '24

Post by Xenich »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
Xenich wrote: April 15th, 2024, 18:13
TKVNC wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:57


I'm not saying you are, but then I'm not surprised a woman can't understand how averages and outliers work. Regardless, Slopdivers using the same model for both Sexes is textbook woke. orin put it pretty well:



I am also conflicted on the idea of subjective beauty - as I would argue certain opinions are demonstrable wrong, or the work of a corrupted mind. I will not go into much detail in this regard, as it opens the gateway to semantics, and pointless argumentation -- the short, and more interesting view, I would propose, is that the idea of 'subjective' beauty is a woke tool, employed to convince people that you cannot shame a view that is not commonly held, because, it's just like your opinion man. However, for nearly all of human history, certain standards have remained constant.
Yep... Terms like symmetry, consonance, etc... are all terms used to describe those standards you mention. Most people find such things pleasing being of that nature (ie shapes, sound, and colors), establishing it as the normality of the human perception. The contrast to them are established as such throughout history of various arts. One can certainly say they individually find asymmetry, dissonant sounds, or clashing colors appealing, but it is not because they are "pleasing" generally, as a rule, but more of an individual taste to which they subjectively established due to various reasons.

Ugly people are not "beautiful", they are homely due to the many factual aspects of their makeup. One can go against the grain and claim otherwise, but it would be as "normal" as claiming you like to put your appendage up the shit hole of another, it isn't just a different taste, it is a complete contradiction to the basis of human evaluation and practice.

The entire movement to promote fat, ugly, and clashing somehow as subjective is nothing more than the insane trying to convince the sane they are abnormal.

All of this goes back to the failed ideology of "relativism" which is the tool used by the abnormal to convince the world it is normal.

In the end, it is just another mentally ill person failing to cope with reality and because of such illness, they see nothing wrong with trying to change the reality of the entire world, rather than just accepting the truth of their place in it. Those types eventually will promote the destruction of those who do not share their qualities because they can never hide from this fact, hence the decimation of such standards throughout the industries.
What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.

So the world is supposed to change its view of what is pleasing because a bunch of fat, ugly, unintelligent narcists can't come to terms with their own reality? Sounds reasonable.

The problem isn't society, its the individuals whining and moaning over not being represented. People don't want to play/watch games/movies where the women look like men and men don't want to watch some fat lard dancing around like they are sexy. Forcing it on to society is going to create a backlash (already is happening) and it won't be pleasant for those who pushed it.

Learn to live with yourself honestly, and you will not be concerned about this. Ever met a woman who knows they are ugly, accepts it, and just doesn't care what people think? They aren't out demanding representation, whining about not being paid attention to, they just don't care about that petty garbage because they aren't insecure little babies who haven't come to terms with reality.

Those are your strong women. They live their life and they don't give two thoughts to the emotional servitude to which all the infantile out there have imprisoned themselves in (and they don't lie to themselves about what is actually beautiful). This normally would have been learned by the feminists if they weren't so busy trying to get rid of the "The Patriarchy". It is a lesson fathers teach their children and it is something most women can't get their head around (which is why they fail as sole family units). Those that do understand this are called exceptional, the rest are just a bunch of breathing emotions.
Last edited by Xenich on April 17th, 2024, 17:26, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2149
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:45
Anon wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:46
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:21


You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.
Which flaws do you see in Barbie? Imo she represents the feminine universe extremely well. And the "oh but you're a man" card can't be pulled considering her massive feminine fanbase.
I think the flaws are just stuff that doesn't make sense for me as a subjective thing. Like I'll be thinking where her organs go since her waist is too thin.
intenstines are fitting in same place as horse cock. vagina insides are like alien spaceships. much bigger inside than on outside.
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2149
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
thats not normal, thats just unbeaten, undsciplined fat cow; jewish vagina rights/fat acceptance distortion
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2149
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

Oyster Sauce wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:49
*woman posts for the first time in a week*
*thread instantly gets 40 replies*

Frig off. Some of us are bothered when we have unread threads
im just here to bully (alleged) vagina till it quits. its my duty
Post Reply