We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/

This meme makes me want to play Helldivers 2

No RPG elements? It probably goes here!
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

Vergil wrote: April 17th, 2024, 17:04
Group of people who allegedly hate women and their attention seeking behavior bump another thread of a woman's attention seeking behavior for multiple pages :D
dont worry i will find sometime to insult u my french, choker wearing, cumbucket faglet.
User avatar
Oyster Sauce
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2123
Joined: Jun 2, '23
Gender: Dinosaur

Post by Oyster Sauce »

Red7 wrote: April 17th, 2024, 18:33
Oyster Sauce wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:49
*woman posts for the first time in a week*
*thread instantly gets 40 replies*

Frig off. Some of us are bothered when we have unread threads
im just here to bully (alleged) vagina till it quits. its my duty
Nothing makes a woman feel less wanted than unlimited attention
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:56
Nicer try but I won't fall for this.
u just too lazy to shave your chest first.
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

Oyster Sauce wrote: April 17th, 2024, 18:39
Red7 wrote: April 17th, 2024, 18:33
Oyster Sauce wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:49
*woman posts for the first time in a week*
*thread instantly gets 40 replies*

Frig off. Some of us are bothered when we have unread threads
im just here to bully (alleged) vagina till it quits. its my duty
Nothing makes a woman feel less wanted than unlimited attention
yes cause stonning a whore is all the attention whore wants

just ask ahmed

edit
i guess she may get aroused after first stone. after her brain fluids start to leak she wont like they way she gets wet tho
Last edited by Red7 on April 17th, 2024, 18:42, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Oyster Sauce
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2123
Joined: Jun 2, '23
Gender: Dinosaur

Post by Oyster Sauce »

Back on topic, you should all want to play HD2 with me, my pal Gary, and my other pal @A Chinese opium den who never showed up
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

Irenaeus wrote: April 17th, 2024, 17:18
She didn't answer my question :scratch:
i probably have bigger tits than her when squezze my chest for narrow pushups
User avatar
A Chinese opium den
Posts: 329
Joined: Dec 6, '23

Post by A Chinese opium den »

Oyster Sauce wrote: April 17th, 2024, 18:44
Back on topic, you should all want to play HD2 with me, my pal Gary, and my other pal @A Chinese opium den who never showed up
I just forget things easily if no one reminds me, Invite me next time you're playing if I'm online and I'll probably accept.
User avatar
Cipher
Posts: 139
Joined: Jan 6, '24

Post by Cipher »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:51
Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:59
AliciaDurge wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:21


You can love something and still see the flaws in the thing you love, btw.
Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.
I didn't say pretty women shouldn't exist in media. They can and should exist. I just told about my own personal preferences.
Exactly. And those preferences include not wanted characters to look like "supermodels" because "not every woman looks like a supermodel" but, YOU are using an avatar of a woman with facial features that are very much in common with Barbie, the "unrealstic beauty standard" icon herself.

So, its fine for you to have a pretty woman in your avatar, but others shouldn't allowed to.
User avatar
Cipher
Posts: 139
Joined: Jan 6, '24

Post by Cipher »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:55
Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 01:15
ArcaneLurker wrote: April 16th, 2024, 01:05

:scratch: The AI pfp looks pretty ugly already. Mid at best.
Its a modded version of Clara from the Beamdog BG2.

Still has pretty, smell and perky nose and with big eyes and simmetrical facial features, with a heartshaped ratio of cheekbones and chin.


You know who also has those facial features?

Yup, none other than Ms. "Unrealistic Beauty Standard" herself, Malibu Barbie!

So, she wants to use an avatar of a pretty woman while crying about videogame characters being "unrealistic supermodels".

Its OK when she gets to LARP as a pretty women. Its everyone else that can't have pretty character models.

*Sighs*. Did you read it when I said that other people can play as pretty super model women for all I care? I was talking about my own personal prefences. Also. I don't know Clara's character. I used her pfp because I was like "ok this looks fine I'll use this" because her looks remind me of my dnd character.
There we go. Clara looks "fine" and "like your D&D character".

Why is your D&D character a pretty woman instead of a REAL (TM) one?
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Cipher wrote: April 17th, 2024, 20:52
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:51
Cipher wrote: April 16th, 2024, 00:59


Then practice what you preach. Don't use a profile picture of a pretty woman. Use a picture of quote unquote "REAL(TM)" woman who doesn't look like a supermodel.
I didn't say pretty women shouldn't exist in media. They can and should exist. I just told about my own personal preferences.
Exactly. And those preferences include not wanted characters to look like "supermodels" because "not every woman looks like a supermodel" but, YOU are using an avatar of a woman with facial features that are very much in common with Barbie, the "unrealstic beauty standard" icon herself.

So, its fine for you to have a pretty woman in your avatar, but others shouldn't allowed to.
OTHER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PLAY AS PRETTY WOMEN. I haven't said that you shouldn't play as one. And I said that SOMETIMES I like to play as the pretty girl/boy in a video game in the starting message. And I know it ain't that deep, it's just my personal preference to sometimes look different. I don't care how other people play their games. I don't know if you're trolling or intentionally misunderstanding me. Others can play as run away models for all I care.
User avatar
Breathe
Posts: 589
Joined: Nov 16, '23

Post by Breathe »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
Do you mean stretch marks? Or have you been visited by a poltergeist...
User avatar
Oyster Sauce
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2123
Joined: Jun 2, '23
Gender: Dinosaur

Post by Oyster Sauce »

@AliciaDurge report the trolls and haters and the HQ's top notch janitorial staff will be obligated to quarantine their posts :smile:
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 542
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

Oyster Sauce wrote: April 17th, 2024, 22:06
@AliciaDurge report the trolls and haters and the HQ's top notch janitorial staff will be obligated to quarantine their posts :smile:
She would but she's double fisting cheeseburgers
User avatar
WhiteShark
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2112
Joined: Feb 2, '23

Post by WhiteShark »

This thread is very problematic. I have no choice but to take action.

Moved to General Video Games because Helldivers 2 is not an RPG.
User avatar
Manny V
Posts: 162
Joined: Mar 19, '24
Location: Castle Drakenhof, Sylvania

Post by Manny V »

alicia shows bobs and vagene
User avatar
Nammu Archag
Posts: 1049
Joined: Nov 28, '23
Location: Tel Uvirith

Post by Nammu Archag »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41

What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Okay so what about people who are stupid or awful. Should they be shamed in any capacity?

Also, I have never seen a woman with stretchmarks before who wasn't a mother or straight-up fat :scratch:
Last edited by Nammu Archag on April 18th, 2024, 08:46, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

Manny V wrote: April 18th, 2024, 06:20
alicia shows bobs and vagene
i think she better not. if it was even barely passable she would be on only kuks instead obscure gaming forum
User avatar
Manny V
Posts: 162
Joined: Mar 19, '24
Location: Castle Drakenhof, Sylvania

Post by Manny V »

Red7 wrote: April 18th, 2024, 08:46
Manny V wrote: April 18th, 2024, 06:20
alicia shows bobs and vagene
i think she better not. if it was even barely passable she would be on only kuks instead obscure gaming forum
ye but if theyre nasty we can all laugh at them
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41
Xenich wrote: April 15th, 2024, 18:13
TKVNC wrote: April 15th, 2024, 16:57


I'm not saying you are, but then I'm not surprised a woman can't understand how averages and outliers work. Regardless, Slopdivers using the same model for both Sexes is textbook woke. orin put it pretty well:



I am also conflicted on the idea of subjective beauty - as I would argue certain opinions are demonstrable wrong, or the work of a corrupted mind. I will not go into much detail in this regard, as it opens the gateway to semantics, and pointless argumentation -- the short, and more interesting view, I would propose, is that the idea of 'subjective' beauty is a woke tool, employed to convince people that you cannot shame a view that is not commonly held, because, it's just like your opinion man. However, for nearly all of human history, certain standards have remained constant.
Yep... Terms like symmetry, consonance, etc... are all terms used to describe those standards you mention. Most people find such things pleasing being of that nature (ie shapes, sound, and colors), establishing it as the normality of the human perception. The contrast to them are established as such throughout history of various arts. One can certainly say they individually find asymmetry, dissonant sounds, or clashing colors appealing, but it is not because they are "pleasing" generally, as a rule, but more of an individual taste to which they subjectively established due to various reasons.

Ugly people are not "beautiful", they are homely due to the many factual aspects of their makeup. One can go against the grain and claim otherwise, but it would be as "normal" as claiming you like to put your appendage up the shit hole of another, it isn't just a different taste, it is a complete contradiction to the basis of human evaluation and practice.

The entire movement to promote fat, ugly, and clashing somehow as subjective is nothing more than the insane trying to convince the sane they are abnormal.

All of this goes back to the failed ideology of "relativism" which is the tool used by the abnormal to convince the world it is normal.

In the end, it is just another mentally ill person failing to cope with reality and because of such illness, they see nothing wrong with trying to change the reality of the entire world, rather than just accepting the truth of their place in it. Those types eventually will promote the destruction of those who do not share their qualities because they can never hide from this fact, hence the decimation of such standards throughout the industries.
What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
weak men and ugly vags should just die
surgery is waste of resources and another fake job from commie wealth redistrubution to vags, we should have positive eugenics so all ugly vags removed from gene pool

imagine all vags were grade A fuckmeats. so much wasted energy of males competing about top fuckmeats would be saved. each fuckmeat would be sold on fair price of 1 goat and we could move on all resources to important things like catching up with technology and consciousness output/focus to fight aliens.
User avatar
Red7
Posts: 2148
Joined: Aug 11, '23

Post by Red7 »

Manny V wrote: April 18th, 2024, 08:47
Red7 wrote: April 18th, 2024, 08:46
Manny V wrote: April 18th, 2024, 06:20
alicia shows bobs and vagene
i think she better not. if it was even barely passable she would be on only kuks instead obscure gaming forum
ye but if theyre nasty we can all laugh at them
u cant unsee it tho
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Breathe wrote: April 17th, 2024, 22:02
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:46
Acrux wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:42


Landwhale detected.
Normal weight women with scratch marks and stomach exists. Porn is not reality.
Do you mean stretch marks? Or have you been visited by a poltergeist...
Lmao yes. Stretch marks. Not being a native speaker does create funny situtations sometimes.
Last edited by AliciaDurge on April 18th, 2024, 14:53, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
AliciaDurge
Posts: 193
Joined: Mar 18, '24

Post by AliciaDurge »

Nammu Archag wrote: April 18th, 2024, 08:45
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41

What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Okay so what about people who are stupid or awful. Should they be shamed in any capacity?

Also, I have never seen a woman with stretchmarks before who wasn't a mother or straight-up fat :scratch:
You can do something about being stupid or awful. But some things are out of our control.

Well, every body has some fat in it, and for women it goes differently than men. You can be in normal, healthy weight and still have stretch marks. Women with big boobs and ass usually have bit of stomach too due to the fat restoring in differently. You can have stretch marks in other places too, not just on your belly.
User avatar
Xenich
Posts: 1111
Joined: Feb 24, '24

Post by Xenich »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 18th, 2024, 14:52
Nammu Archag wrote: April 18th, 2024, 08:45
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41

What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Okay so what about people who are stupid or awful. Should they be shamed in any capacity?

Also, I have never seen a woman with stretchmarks before who wasn't a mother or straight-up fat :scratch:
You can do something about being stupid or awful. But some things are out of our control.

Well, every body has some fat in it, and for women it goes differently than men. You can be in normal, healthy weight and still have stretch marks. Women with big boobs and ass usually have bit of stomach too due to the fat restoring in differently. You can have stretch marks in other places too, not just on your belly.
The problem with your position is it tries to defy reality and promote that which is false. You argue against the existence of beauty because it does not praise that which is not so. It is a failure to accept truth, an envious position of hate for that which it does not have. In fact, those who promote this line of thinking are actually shaming beauty because it exists and then admonishing all who admire it. It is petty, self absorbed, and malicious. Stop coveting that of others, be content in that which you have.

Troons/gays are the very picture of someone who refuses to accept who they are and fights against nature to change it while condemning all who do not accept their own faults.

It is the essence of self hatred to which they revel in.
Last edited by Xenich on April 18th, 2024, 15:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kalarion
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 367
Joined: Feb 2, '23

Post by Kalarion »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 18th, 2024, 14:52
You can do something about being stupid or awful. But some things are out of our control.
Now I'm curious what your position on the OG incel phenomenon is.

I'm not, I already know your opinion, shut the fuck up and go away.
User avatar
Nammu Archag
Posts: 1049
Joined: Nov 28, '23
Location: Tel Uvirith

Post by Nammu Archag »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 18th, 2024, 14:52
You can do something about being stupid or awful.
What if I told you that most people literally can't? That something like our IQ range (which has the most impact on how stupid someone is) is predetermined before we are even born, and is the same as height, skin color, or build etc.?
Last edited by Nammu Archag on April 18th, 2024, 19:58, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
anonusername
Posts: 22
Joined: Feb 17, '24

Post by anonusername »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 9th, 2024, 15:10
Image

Seriously tho, I don't like the unrealistic armor where you can just stick a sword through the ribs and the female pc going around in bikini armor should die due to it. Same goes for male pc going around with skimpy armor, but it's rarely that way. Not every female character needs to look like a run away model while going around killing enemies, there is a time and place for that. Disclaimer btw, this is just my opinion and I just use mods if I'm turned off too much by the unrealistic armor in games. I sometimes like to make my pc look like a pretty girl or boy, but usually I like to run with a realistic armor. Tho if it's planned for women to go around looking like run away models all the time, at least it should be made equal. Let male characters have skimpy armors too, please.
Have you seen what women wear IRL without an official dress code? Bikini armor is absolutely realistic. The unrealistic part is that the average female character is effective in combat.

Also, women do actually need differently shaped armor; male armor tends to be uncomfortable for them. This is especially the case for those with more "womanly" figures. This is less true for flexible armors like mail than it is for plates, but a properly fitted piece will still be more comfortable.
User avatar
Xenich
Posts: 1111
Joined: Feb 24, '24

Post by Xenich »

Nammu Archag wrote: April 18th, 2024, 19:57
AliciaDurge wrote: April 18th, 2024, 14:52
You can do something about being stupid or awful.
What if I told you that most people literally can't? That something like our IQ range (which has the most impact on how stupid someone is) is predetermined before we are even born, and is the same as height, skin color, or build etc.?
You will get into statistical outliers being used as a standard for their argument, I doubt they will understand.
User avatar
anonusername
Posts: 22
Joined: Feb 17, '24

Post by anonusername »

AliciaDurge wrote: April 18th, 2024, 14:52
Nammu Archag wrote: April 18th, 2024, 08:45
AliciaDurge wrote: April 17th, 2024, 16:41

What about stuff considered ugly but a person can't do anything about it? I think we shouldn't shame people for stuff they have no control over. You can't change your face symmetry unless you go under surgery which a) costs your life savings and b) can go horribly wrong. I've been shamed for having little stomach and scratch marks even though I'm at normal weight, but that stuff is normal. Also, stuff like BMI is not always accurate.
Okay so what about people who are stupid or awful. Should they be shamed in any capacity?

Also, I have never seen a woman with stretchmarks before who wasn't a mother or straight-up fat :scratch:
You can do something about being stupid or awful. But some things are out of our control.

Well, every body has some fat in it, and for women it goes differently than men. You can be in normal, healthy weight and still have stretch marks. Women with big boobs and ass usually have bit of stomach too due to the fat restoring in differently. You can have stretch marks in other places too, not just on your belly.
If a woman with big boobs and ass spends the same amount of time in the gym as a guy with no belly fat, then she probably won't have much belly fat at all. The healthy percentage of body fat is about 5-10% higher for women, but that doesn't mean women who look fat are healthy. It means that an attractive amount of fat in the breasts, hips, ass, thighs, etc. adds up to 5-10% of body weight. The reality is that even the average "thin" and "fit" person has some excess fat, but criticizing a man for not having a six-pack is acceptable whereas criticizing a woman for having a belly is not acceptable. Your BMI is probably pretty accurate and you simply don't build as muscle or burn as much fat as you like to think. BMI is mostly inaccurate for powerlifters, bodybuilders, and others who spend 10+ hours a week at the gym and are *far* above the average when it comes to muscle weight. Every normie I have heard say "BMI is not always accurate" IRL has been visibly overweight. The guys (and girls) whose biceps put them into the "overweight" BMI don't feel a need to soothe their insecurities by bringing BMI up for no reason.

EDIT: I have literally never seen a woman IRL who was at a healthy weight, didn't have danger hair, and was still ugly. Not everyone can be a 9 or a 10, but in 99% of cases being ugly is a choice. Even being a 9+ basically just requires having naturally large tits+hips and being in good shape.
Last edited by anonusername on April 21st, 2024, 18:59, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply