We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/

Ross Scott's 'Stop Killing Games' Campaign

No RPG elements? It probably goes here!
User avatar
WhiteShark
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 2108
Joined: Feb 2, '23

Post by WhiteShark »

Ubisoft is now deleting licenses for The Crew from players' accounts, presumably as a ploy to get around Ross' legal efforts. I won't pretend to know EU law, but I can't help but think this is going to backfire spectactularly.

Image

https://archive.is/ZC43r

The archived page came out very badly for some reason, so I'm also putting the original link below:
https://www.pcgamer.com/games/racing/ub ... ership-is/
User avatar
anonusername
Posts: 22
Joined: Feb 17, '24

Post by anonusername »

The only correct answer is to clarify that using "purchase" or "buy" instead of "license" or "rent" means either
1. The consumer needs to have a perpetual and transferable right to use software with the functionality and terms of service as of the initial purpose. Any updates can introduce new terms of service, but they must either be optional or allow for a refund. Whether some portions of the functionality are implemented server-side is an implementation detail which should have no bearing on the consumer's right to use the original functionality. How the companies ensure consumers are able to use the functionality they paid for is up to them.
2. By using the terms "purchase", "buy", etc. the publisher is committing fraud and should be liable for treble damages. i.e. if the game you "bought" for $60 on steam ceases functioning because it is always-online and the servers go down, then you are entitled to a $180 refund, possibly much more if you are a professional streamer or competitive gamer.

If this were implemented in the American legal system the publishers would immediately change their behavior.
Last edited by anonusername on April 13th, 2024, 05:38, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply