We have a Steam curator now. You should be following it. https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44994899-RPGHQ/

Dune, Star Wars and its ilk are not sci-fi

Movies? TV shows? Books? Comics? Music? It goes here.
User avatar
rusty_shackleford
Site Admin
Posts: 10240
Joined: Feb 2, '23
Contact:

Dune, Star Wars and its ilk are not sci-fi

Post by rusty_shackleford »

That includes WH40k.
I just wanted to remind everyone of this.


"…It's a fantasy, it's not science-fiction"
User avatar
Jordy
Posts: 103
Joined: Dec 5, '23

Post by Jordy »

But... but... the Millennium Falcon made the Kessle run in less than 12 parsecs...
User avatar
Roguey
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 607
Joined: Feb 4, '23

Post by Roguey »

There are Starship Troopers truthers who insist that the meteor was a false flag because it doesn't obey the laws of science even though the director himself said the bugs sent it.
User avatar
ArcaneLurker
Posts: 889
Joined: Feb 6, '24

Post by ArcaneLurker »

Star Trek is boring and basically just made to paint a multiracial future for White people.
User avatar
Emphyrio
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mar 21, '23

Post by Emphyrio »

Fantasy is any story containing supernatural or impossible elements. Sci fi is a subgenre of fantasy. All the way back in the 1920s, there were always a few freaks who insisted that "scientifiction" was somehow transcendent and better, a group consisting mostly of communists and pedorasts.
User avatar
Vergil
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sep 6, '23

Post by Vergil »

Also I agree with the OP but using an interview with one of the (jewish) actors who had little to no input on the writing/worldbuilding and has been borderline hostile towards the project from the get go isn't the best evidence.
User avatar
maidenhaver
Posts: 4254
Joined: Apr 17, '23
Location: ROLE PLAYING GAME
Contact:

Post by maidenhaver »

Emphyrio wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:53
Fantasy is any story containing supernatural or impossible elements. Sci fi is a subgenre of fantasy. All the way back in the 1920s, there were always a few freaks who insisted that "scientifiction" was somehow transcendent and better, a group consisting mostly of communists and pedorasts.
Fantasy then developed into a smaller genre of its own.
User avatar
maidenhaver
Posts: 4254
Joined: Apr 17, '23
Location: ROLE PLAYING GAME
Contact:

Post by maidenhaver »

Vergil wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:53
And here's why thats a good thing.
Yeah, because as of now the White race has no future.
User avatar
Emphyrio
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mar 21, '23

Post by Emphyrio »

maidenhaver wrote: February 29th, 2024, 14:00
Emphyrio wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:53
Fantasy is any story containing supernatural or impossible elements. Sci fi is a subgenre of fantasy. All the way back in the 1920s, there were always a few freaks who insisted that "scientifiction" was somehow transcendent and better, a group consisting mostly of communists and pedorasts.
Fantasy then developed into a smaller genre of its own.
I don't know what you mean by that, unless you think "fantasy" means the hobbit and d&d. It's unfortunate that the good term "sword and sorcery" is disused. Fantasy includes everything from The Illiad, to Harry Potter, to A Rendezvous with Rama. All something needs to be fantasy is a fantastic element.

Clark Ashton Smith did a good takedown of scientifiction snobs, as a sci fi writer himself. He pointed out that in the future, most of what they believed in would probably be proven to be fantasy, rendering their assertions that they were superior to fantasy writers moot. History has vindicated him, and many things, such as aliens, transstellar travel and psychic powers, that were firmly in scientification, have now proven to be nothing but fantasy. Smith pointed out that the sorcery described by the Latin writer Apuleius " was regarded as science by the moiety of his contemporaries", and suggested that Sigmund Freud should be considered a sci fi writer.
User avatar
Rand
Posts: 1652
Joined: Sep 4, '23
Location: On my last legs

Post by Rand »

Once upon a time, what we would now call fantasy was believed to be possible, making it the SF of its era.

I'm not making any point. I just find it amusing.

Edit: damn it @Emphyrio !
Last edited by Rand on February 29th, 2024, 15:23, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Atlantico
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 947
Joined: Feb 23, '23

Post by Atlantico »

rusty_shackleford wrote: February 29th, 2024, 07:39
That includes WH40k.
I just wanted to remind everyone of this.


"…It's a fantasy, it's not science-fiction"
Fantastic information, if you are autistic.

Normal people correctly do not give a shit :eyebrows:
User avatar
Atlantico
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 947
Joined: Feb 23, '23

Post by Atlantico »

Roguey wrote: February 29th, 2024, 10:57
There are Starship Troopers truthers who insist that the meteor was a false flag because it doesn't obey the laws of science even though the director himself said the bugs sent it.
We will name no names :goldfish:
User avatar
Dead
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 1688
Joined: Feb 6, '23

Post by Dead »

Verhoeven doesn't want to be suicided.
User avatar
Nooneatall
Posts: 509
Joined: Dec 4, '23

Post by Nooneatall »

Emphyrio wrote: February 29th, 2024, 15:16
maidenhaver wrote: February 29th, 2024, 14:00
Emphyrio wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:53
Fantasy is any story containing supernatural or impossible elements. Sci fi is a subgenre of fantasy. All the way back in the 1920s, there were always a few freaks who insisted that "scientifiction" was somehow transcendent and better, a group consisting mostly of communists and pedorasts.
Fantasy then developed into a smaller genre of its own.
I don't know what you mean by that, unless you think "fantasy" means the hobbit and d&d. It's unfortunate that the good term "sword and sorcery" is disused. Fantasy includes everything from The Illiad, to Harry Potter, to A Rendezvous with Rama. All something needs to be fantasy is a fantastic element.

Clark Ashton Smith did a good takedown of scientifiction snobs, as a sci fi writer himself. He pointed out that in the future, most of what they believed in would probably be proven to be fantasy, rendering their assertions that they were superior to fantasy writers moot. History has vindicated him, and many things, such as aliens, transstellar travel and psychic powers, that were firmly in scientification, have now proven to be nothing but fantasy. Smith pointed out that the sorcery described by the Latin writer Apuleius " was regarded as science by the moiety of his contemporaries", and suggested that Sigmund Freud should be considered a sci fi writer.
Remote viewing was proven though. Establishment snobs just turn up their nose if they don't like the results of an experiment. Aliens could be real to.
User avatar
maidenhaver
Posts: 4254
Joined: Apr 17, '23
Location: ROLE PLAYING GAME
Contact:

Post by maidenhaver »

Emphyrio wrote: February 29th, 2024, 15:16
maidenhaver wrote: February 29th, 2024, 14:00
Emphyrio wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:53
Fantasy is any story containing supernatural or impossible elements. Sci fi is a subgenre of fantasy. All the way back in the 1920s, there were always a few freaks who insisted that "scientifiction" was somehow transcendent and better, a group consisting mostly of communists and pedorasts.
Fantasy then developed into a smaller genre of its own.
I don't know what you mean by that, unless you think "fantasy" means the hobbit and d&d. It's unfortunate that the good term "sword and sorcery" is disused. Fantasy includes everything from The Illiad, to Harry Potter, to A Rendezvous with Rama. All something needs to be fantasy is a fantastic element.

Clark Ashton Smith did a good takedown of scientifiction snobs, as a sci fi writer himself. He pointed out that in the future, most of what they believed in would probably be proven to be fantasy, rendering their assertions that they were superior to fantasy writers moot. History has vindicated him, and many things, such as aliens, transstellar travel and psychic powers, that were firmly in scientification, have now proven to be nothing but fantasy. Smith pointed out that the sorcery described by the Latin writer Apuleius " was regarded as science by the moiety of his contemporaries", and suggested that Sigmund Freud should be considered a sci fi writer.
lol
User avatar
Xenich
Posts: 1055
Joined: Feb 24, '24

Post by Xenich »

ArcaneLurker wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:51
Star Trek is boring and basically just made to paint a multiracial future for White people.
A realization I came to understand, but I can't help that I like them. Not a fanatic fan, I enjoyed both franchises (watching them in the theaters on release), but there are layers to how woke the show/movies got depending on episode/movie. Over all though, its my youth, and so it is something I have tolerated to a given level (I prefer the original, NG, DS9, Voyager for some reason, I don't know why, and Enterprise for various reasons, as well as some of the fan made content). For Star Wars, while I have watched the Ep 1-3 and have them, not something I care for, mostly I just like the original series which I got the Despecialized Editions). Past that, to my knowledge no other Star wars or Star Trek exists (no, there are none.. seriously, I refuse to even acknowledge them).
User avatar
Tweed
Turtle
Turtle
Posts: 1635
Joined: Feb 2, '23

Post by Tweed »

Science Fantasy and Space Opera. /thread
User avatar
ArcaneLurker
Posts: 889
Joined: Feb 6, '24

Post by ArcaneLurker »

Xenich wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:13
ArcaneLurker wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:51
Star Trek is boring and basically just made to paint a multiracial future for White people.
A realization I came to understand, but I can't help that I like them. Not a fanatic fan, I enjoyed both franchises (watching them in the theaters on release), but there are layers to how woke the show/movies got depending on episode/movie. Over all though, its my youth, and so it is something I have tolerated to a given level (I prefer the original, NG, DS9, Voyager for some reason, I don't know why, and Enterprise for various reasons, as well as some of the fan made content). For Star Wars, while I have watched the Ep 1-3 and have them, not something I care for, mostly I just like the original series which I got the Despecialized Editions).
It reminds me of someone that tries so hard to be mature that they come off as infantile, or tries hard to appear clever, but it's all superficial.
There are still elements about it which I like, but it's all very sterile-- meaning not a lot of emotion or humour.
Episode 1-3, of Star Wars, I liked as a kid because cool designs and flashy nonsense, but now I like it for a different reason, probably not the reason that George intended :lol:

Overall I prefer sci-fi with a mystical or magical side. Lots of whimsy and romanticism. I'd consider space opera to be a type of sci-fi, and sci-fi to be a type of fantasy fiction.
Past that, to my knowledge no other Star wars or Star Trek exists (no, there are none.. seriously, I refuse to even acknowledge them).
I too try to not acknowledge their desecration, even after recognising the flaws of what they desecrate.
Last edited by ArcaneLurker on February 29th, 2024, 16:43, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vergil
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sep 6, '23

Post by Vergil »

The prequels are more intelligent and well made films than the originals and Lucas' special edition changes are good/the definitive way to see the films.
User avatar
ArcaneLurker
Posts: 889
Joined: Feb 6, '24

Post by ArcaneLurker »

Vergil wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:45
The prequels are more intelligent and well made films than the originals
:scratch: The originals were a bit of a fluke, in the way they were developed, and his wife had a lot to do with their success. So I agree. Although George's Prequel dialogue is still amusing.
User avatar
Vergil
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sep 6, '23

Post by Vergil »

ArcaneLurker wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:53
and his wife had a lot to do with their success.
His wife's input is vastly overstated due to urban legends created by anti-lucas soyim.

EDIT: Most of which come from that God awful "How Star Wars was Saved in the Edit" video which is filled with enough misinformation the US government should hire the creators.
Last edited by Vergil on February 29th, 2024, 16:58, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ArcaneLurker
Posts: 889
Joined: Feb 6, '24

Post by ArcaneLurker »

Vergil wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:55
ArcaneLurker wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:53
and his wife had a lot to do with their success.
His wife's input is vastly overstated due to urban legends created by anti-lucas soyim.
The original ideas for the original trilogy are nothing like how it turned out so there must be some truth to it-- Whether it was his wife or some Jewish advisor, I don't really give a shit.
The prequels were more in line with what George originally wanted to create.
User avatar
Xenich
Posts: 1055
Joined: Feb 24, '24

Post by Xenich »

ArcaneLurker wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:43
Xenich wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:13
ArcaneLurker wrote: February 29th, 2024, 12:51
Star Trek is boring and basically just made to paint a multiracial future for White people.
A realization I came to understand, but I can't help that I like them. Not a fanatic fan, I enjoyed both franchises (watching them in the theaters on release), but there are layers to how woke the show/movies got depending on episode/movie. Over all though, its my youth, and so it is something I have tolerated to a given level (I prefer the original, NG, DS9, Voyager for some reason, I don't know why, and Enterprise for various reasons, as well as some of the fan made content). For Star Wars, while I have watched the Ep 1-3 and have them, not something I care for, mostly I just like the original series which I got the Despecialized Editions).
It reminds me of someone that tries so hard to be mature that they come off as infantile, or tries hard to appear clever, but it's all superficial.
Yeah, I do get that feeling from time to time, but they have always been kind of "corny" from the start, so it never bothered me so much. I think it often funny too, as a lot of the early sci-fi movies are that way as well.
User avatar
Nammu Archag
Posts: 1026
Joined: Nov 28, '23
Location: Tel Uvirith

Post by Nammu Archag »

Actual 40k is more realistic than 90% of science slop that gets put out. Few others actually deal with economies of scale or the absurd numbers involved with production on a galactic scale. Having aliens from another dimension with space magic or massive warships is more realistic than Star Trek teleporters or niggers being civilized.
User avatar
KnightoftheWind
Posts: 1618
Joined: Feb 27, '23

Post by KnightoftheWind »

Vergil wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:45
The prequels are more intelligent and well made films than the originals and Lucas' special edition changes are good/the definitive way to see the films.
All of Star Wars is juvenile tat. The prequels basically champion the redditor's view of politics, where the Republic is objectively good, and the Empire is objectively evil because...democracy good?. The prequels also undermined the mythology that had been set up by the original films. Rather than the "Force" being genuinely supernatural and mysterious, it was retconned into being just another form of physical phenomenon, caused by midichlorions. Regardless, I tire of Star Wars more than any other franchise at this point. I don't want to see or hear anything Star Wars for the rest of my days.
User avatar
maidenhaver
Posts: 4254
Joined: Apr 17, '23
Location: ROLE PLAYING GAME
Contact:

Post by maidenhaver »

Vergil wrote: February 29th, 2024, 16:45
The prequels are more intelligent and well made films than the originals and Lucas' special edition changes are good/the definitive way to see the films.
Ah, the latest revisionism.
Post Reply