Rand wrote: ↑
February 23rd, 2024, 20:54
Why do you think misandrist feminism split?
Half want to encourage men deleting their maleness, the other half (correctly, but for the wrong reasons) see them as males, and their intent as gaming women's spaces and such.
I do not think they split at all, at least when it comes to misandry, they are infighting of course but they would never ally with men to combat the troon menace. Some even claim that trans-rights are men's rights in disguise, which is absolute nonsense, even though in certain circumstances I would defend a man pretending to be a woman for example when misandry generalizes his maleness into being a rapist.
Feminists like Lorber have always argued for decades now that Sex is not real and that all differences between the sexes are societal the people following that idea, which you correctly see as the eradication of anything male (props for that, it eludes many, they think it's solely celebrating of femaleness or a cope to avoid the sin of maleness) this is just feminism thought until it's logical conclusion.
Most feminists are *not* true believers in the Dogma though, they are simple female supremacists, while all of them think maleness is the devil the TERFs realize that men becoming women would mean the end for their movement, namely that they would give men some privileges back that they really want to keep for themselves. It's also the reason why they don't care about FtM transitioners, it's fine as long less people occupy the victim stack, but it's certainly not okay for men to become more than a victim on the stack as a woman.
I have yet to see TERFs in any quantity (or at all, not to say there may exist the odd one) exclaiming that FtM is a problem it's also just pure misandry from what I am seeing.
EDIT: I was writing at the time of the post
@Segata Sanshiro if there is need to be futher discussion I will debate it there.