Interesting. What are your thoughts on this position (the video). I will do a quick summary, but the videos cover in the first, and then maybe a few other places.hilandar777 wrote: ↑ March 13th, 2024, 16:48You jest, but Jesus was Gaul. He was not a brown semite. Daughters of Josiah (David's line, who in turn comes from Japheth's line, who is basically the father of the white race) when the Babylonians conquered Judah, found refuge in Gaul (France), then other Celtic lands where they married kings and chieftains. Eventually their descendant Mary, who was white, gave birth to Yeshua... Jesus was French.Vergil wrote: ↑ March 11th, 2024, 19:03Niggers killed all the Frenchmen and as divine punishment for harming his chosen people God cursed them forever with terminal niggeritis.
But yeah, if you have 99% percentage of negro colored population that country is developmentally degrading back from bronze to stone age.
Anyway, it reasons that there were two main groups created during creation, that there were Hunter Gather groups created, then Adam was created. That these hunter groups had lived on the planet during that time and had evolved without Gods instructions (do not eat from the tree of knowledge) and that when he created Adam, he walked with him, and instructed him. This is explained as why there were so many people around when Cain murdered Able and that he went off to marry with those groups.
It then goes on but eventually gets to (edit: Noah) where it says that (edit: Noah) sons were Caucasian and that this is reasoned also by the location the flood occurred, where the ARK landed and lines up with the sons as they left and went to other areas of the world (mixing with the existing groups). I think it is video 5 that gets into this about the Greek translations being able to be translated to either direction, but somehow were favored to lean it polytheism .
Anyway, this coincides with a lot of secular accounts (confirmed in the Bible) that seem suggest the sons moved out and mixed with the various regions (which explains why we now show the early Egyptian leaders to be white). Anyway, it is an interesting series and one that seems to have a lot of logical support and if reasoned this way actually removes a lot of the "mysticism" and really odd unexplained things that seem to conflict with what we know about genetics nowadays. Is it true? No sure, but it is very well reasoned.
https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/RoA5siMHE79y/