RPGHQ

Thanks for creating this mod all by yourself @loregamer, you should also post a paypal page for people to properly reward you for all your hard work.

ArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 21:21

SlayerOfGods wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 21:06
I don't think it's a hot take to say that uploading someone else's content on a different site without their permission, claiming it's your own work and not giving proper credit to the actual creator is a bad thing. But maybe you're just THAT detached from reality lol.
Apologies monsieur, but wivout zee, 'ow you say, formal DMCA complaint, zerr is nothing ouie can do.

https://vocaroo.com/13JnRSAiRqUk

Tweed wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 21:38

ArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 21:21

SlayerOfGods wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 21:06
I don't think it's a hot take to say that uploading someone else's content on a different site without their permission, claiming it's your own work and not giving proper credit to the actual creator is a bad thing. But maybe you're just THAT detached from reality lol.
Apologies monsieur, but wivout zee, 'ow you say, formal DMCA complaint, zerr is nothing ouie can do.
https://vocaroo.com/13JnRSAiRqUk

Mazikeensa wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 19:16
Hello this is my mod, that I made. Please take it down, you did not contact me the proper way.

Although he could have put a few more text lines on this page to more clearly specify the author (do that @loregamer), he's directly linked to you on Nexus, (and then put work in to tweak it himself to work with the current patch).
He's clearly not claiming ownership of your work. What more do you want?

Did you ask Larian programmers if you could modify their code?

BobT wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:13

Mazikeensa wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 19:16
Hello this is my mod, that I made. Please take it down, you did not contact me the proper way.
(do that @loregamer, he's directly linked to you on Nexus, (and then put work in to tweak it himself to work with the current patch)

Why are you telling people what to do and why is it in order to make nexus ******** happier?

I hope someone posts the inevitable livejournal post about this incident here!

To be more on topic now that the **** have been scared off I appreciate @loregamer taking the time to update and post a mod that the mod author had clearly abandoned with no intention of actually fixing it after 4 months. The fact he only got off his *** and fixed his **** because he's so petty someone might click a download link on a different website is peak narcissism.

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:19
To be more on topic now that the **** have been scared off I appreciate @loregamer taking the time to update and post a mod that the mod author had clearly abandoned with no intention of actually fixing it after 4 months. The fact he only got off his *** and fixed his **** because he's so petty someone might click a download link on a different website is peak narcissism.

Checking the nexus mod, it appears to not be updated. In fact, there's a bug marked WONTFIX.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/ ... 4?tab=bugs

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:15

BobT wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:13

Mazikeensa wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 19:16
Hello this is my mod, that I made. Please take it down, you did not contact me the proper way.
(do that @loregamer, he's directly linked to you on Nexus, (and then put work in to tweak it himself to work with the current patch)
Why are you telling people what to do and why is it in order to make nexus ******** happier?

Because it's standard good practice dipshit, and renders ANY complaints impotent.
Better ModHQ be seen as a serious modding site.

BobT wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:24

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:15

BobT wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:13

(do that @loregamer, he's directly linked to you on Nexus, (and then put work in to tweak it himself to work with the current patch)
Why are you telling people what to do and why is it in order to make nexus ******** happier?
Because it's standard good practice dipshit, and renders ANY complaints impotent.

As opposed to the potent complaints they have now?

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:25

BobT wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:24

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:15

Why are you telling people what to do and why is it in order to make nexus ******** happier?
Because it's standard good practice dipshit, and renders ANY complaints impotent.
As opposed to the potent complaints they have now?

Greater clarity and transparency is not a bad thing.

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:21

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:19
To be more on topic now that the **** have been scared off I appreciate @loregamer taking the time to update and post a mod that the mod author had clearly abandoned with no intention of actually fixing it after 4 months. The fact he only got off his *** and fixed his **** because he's so petty someone might click a download link on a different website is peak narcissism.
Checking the nexus mod, it appears to not be updated. In fact, there's a bug marked WONTFIX.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/ ... 4?tab=bugs

Mod now set to hidden after I pointed it out. @Vergil being mean.

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:26

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:21

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:19
To be more on topic now that the **** have been scared off I appreciate @loregamer taking the time to update and post a mod that the mod author had clearly abandoned with no intention of actually fixing it after 4 months. The fact he only got off his *** and fixed his **** because he's so petty someone might click a download link on a different website is peak narcissism.
Checking the nexus mod, it appears to not be updated. In fact, there's a bug marked WONTFIX.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/ ... 4?tab=bugs
Mod now set to hidden after I pointed it out. @Vergil being mean.

>comes to site to demand mod gets taken down
>end result is an hour of seething and then him removing his own mod from the nexus instead

For evidence purposes.
OAuthor abandoned the mod. Had open usage permissions. Loregamer followed rules. Author comes screaming for takedown. Nope. Not putting up with this nonsense. This is anti-modder behaviour and should be stomped out.

@Mazikeensa I appreciate your work as a modder

I'm glad that author had enough in him to just set mod into hidden status, instead of coming here, screaming ownership and demanding takedown, while he gets the download of Lore's fix (and complete rework of code tbh) and proceeds to quietly upload not his fix to nexus.

Silver wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:38
I'm glad that author had enough in him to just set mod into hidden status, instead of coming here, screaming ownership and demanding takedown, while he gets the download of Lore's fix (and complete rework of code tbh) and proceeds to quietly upload not his fix to nexus.

I was gunna say that I was surprised they didn't do that, but then again, clearly not the brightest.

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:19
To be more on topic now that the **** have been scared off I appreciate @loregamer taking the time to update and post a mod that the mod author had clearly abandoned with no intention of actually fixing it after 4 months. The fact he only got off his *** and fixed his **** because he's so petty someone might click a download link on a different website is peak narcissism.

Appreciate it chief.

Really I'm just helping these mod authors be their best selves by motivating them to actually update and improve their mods hahaha

ArcaneLurker wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:41

Silver wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:38
I'm glad that author had enough in him to just set mod into hidden status, instead of coming here, screaming ownership and demanding takedown, while he gets the download of Lore's fix (and complete rework of code tbh) and proceeds to quietly upload not his fix to nexus.
I was gunna say that I was surprised they didn't do that, but then again, clearly not the brightest.

They are narcissists. If he cared about fixing the mod he would have done that. He just wanted to throw his weight around and brow beat someone into doing what he says so he can feel special about adding a trash can into a video game.

Vergil wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:27

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:26

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:21

Checking the nexus mod, it appears to not be updated. In fact, there's a bug marked WONTFIX.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/ ... 4?tab=bugs
Mod now set to hidden after I pointed it out. @Vergil being mean.
>comes to site to demand mod gets taken down
>end result is an hour of seething and then him removing his own mod from the nexus instead

Mazikeensa wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 19:16
Hello this is my mod, that I made. Please take it down, you did not contact me the proper way.

Not gonna take it down but I'll add a credits section to the post. The mod author names were on the file as well so people will know it was your mod.

In regards to the Messagebox issue, check this Github issue for a solution. I implemented something similar for this version of the mod. Feel free to unpack the mod and take a look at it! Just a warning about this bit of code, though:

Before, if you called OpenMessageBox a million times, it would stack a million different messageboxes on top of each other that you had to confirm for each one. But with the way we have to do messageboxes now, calling ReadyCheckSpecific won't stack on top of each other. You can only have one messagebox on the screen at a time, I think. That's why I changed the mod to not open a messagebox per item and just a general "Do you want to trash these items?" message. If you wanted to keep the original functionality, you'd probably have to do something hacky. I changed the mod to insert each item you're putting into the trashcan into a table:

And then when we check for ReadyCheckPassed, I request to delete them individually. Otherwise, it clears out the table:

Anyway that's all I did to update it. Get to work!

And some parting words:

I left some trash on the side of the road that I never intended to return for… But I just found out someone picked it up and made it into something useful. Now I’m mad and want my abandoned trash back!

RK-9 wrote: ↑ February 26th, 2024, 01:02
I left some trash on the side of the road that I never intended to return for… But I just found out someone picked it up and made it into something useful. Now I’m mad and want my abandoned trash back!

If only there was a working trashcan to put it in..

Unwanted wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 20:59
What a bunch of entitled twats you are

[citation needed]

loregamer wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:55

Mazikeensa wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 19:16
Hello this is my mod, that I made. Please take it down, you did not contact me the proper way.
Not gonna take it down but I'll add a credits section to the post. The mod author names were on the file as well so people will know it was your mod.

In regards to the Messagebox issue, check this Github issue for a solution. I implemented something similar for this version of the mod. Feel free to unpack the mod and take a look at it! Just a warning about this bit of code, though:

Before, if you called OpenMessageBox a million times, it would stack a million different messageboxes on top of each other that you had to confirm for each one. But with the way we have to do messageboxes now, calling ReadyCheckSpecific won't stack on top of each other. You can only have one messagebox on the screen at a time, I think. That's why I changed the mod to not open a messagebox per item and just a general "Do you want to trash these items?" message. If you wanted to keep the original functionality, you'd probably have to do something hacky. I changed the mod to insert each item you're putting into the trashcan into a table:

And then when we check for ReadyCheckPassed, I request to delete them individually. Otherwise, it clears out the table:

Anyway that's all I did to update it. Get to work!

And some parting words:

She finally did it! Proud of you @Mazikeensa

I think you forgot to put me under credits, though. Just an error I'm sure, no worries.

loregamer wrote: ↑ March 22nd, 2024, 22:51

loregamer wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:55

Mazikeensa wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 19:16
Hello this is my mod, that I made. Please take it down, you did not contact me the proper way.
Not gonna take it down but I'll add a credits section to the post. The mod author names were on the file as well so people will know it was your mod.

In regards to the Messagebox issue, check this Github issue for a solution. I implemented something similar for this version of the mod. Feel free to unpack the mod and take a look at it! Just a warning about this bit of code, though:

Before, if you called OpenMessageBox a million times, it would stack a million different messageboxes on top of each other that you had to confirm for each one. But with the way we have to do messageboxes now, calling ReadyCheckSpecific won't stack on top of each other. You can only have one messagebox on the screen at a time, I think. That's why I changed the mod to not open a messagebox per item and just a general "Do you want to trash these items?" message. If you wanted to keep the original functionality, you'd probably have to do something hacky. I changed the mod to insert each item you're putting into the trashcan into a table:

And then when we check for ReadyCheckPassed, I request to delete them individually. Otherwise, it clears out the table:

Anyway that's all I did to update it. Get to work!

And some parting words:

She finally did it! Proud of you @Mazikeensa

I think you forgot to put me under credits, though. Just an error I'm sure, no worries.

If you're from UK you could file a lawsuit against Nexus, at least I'd bet UK doesn't let enterprises host defamatory content, and Nexus is hosting somebody wrongfully accusing you of being a thief.

Yeah, but, how do you steal a mod? lmao

Anon wrote: ↑ March 22nd, 2024, 22:54
If you're from UK you could file a lawsuit against Nexus, at least I'd bet UK doesn't let enterprises host defamatory content, and Nexus is hosting somebody wrongfully accusing you of being a thief.

Meh I don't care that much. I meant what I said here:

loregamer wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:41
Really I'm just helping these mod authors be their best selves by motivating them to actually update and improve their mods

If Mazi gets lazy again then I'll fix it, but I think I gave her the motivation she needed.

Acrux wrote: ↑ March 22nd, 2024, 22:56
Yeah, but, how do you steal a mod? lmao

You don't, that's factually impossible, that's why such accusation is obviously illegal.

loregamer wrote: ↑ March 22nd, 2024, 23:00

Anon wrote: ↑ March 22nd, 2024, 22:54
If you're from UK you could file a lawsuit against Nexus, at least I'd bet UK doesn't let enterprises host defamatory content, and Nexus is hosting somebody wrongfully accusing you of being a thief.
Meh I don't care that much. I meant what I said here:
loregamer wrote: ↑ February 25th, 2024, 22:41
Really I'm just helping these mod authors be their best selves by motivating them to actually update and improve their mods
If Mazi gets lazy again then I'll fix it, but I think I gave her the motivation she needed.

Yeah I wouldn't as well, but I think it'd be funny if somebody was willing to let **** hit the fan against Nexus and stupid uppity modders.

The obvious solution here is everytime we catalogue or update a mod someone has made before, we add the words '******' or '******' or the phrase 'total ****** death' into one of the files, in such a way that it does not impact the game, but leaves an indelible stain.

I've never understood it myself anyway, all the mods I ever made were just free to do whatever people wanted with them. What's so important about freely shared content that you have to throw a temper tantrum that someone is using it?

*typo

RPGHQ

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3

Trashcan 1.2.0 — Baldur's Gate 3