RPGHQ Curator Recommendations

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » April 27th, 2024, 03:30

Oyster Sauce wrote: ↑ April 27th, 2024, 03:23
Seems weird for a forum curator to review games for which we don't have threads or discussions

Make a thread and discussion about them.

Tweed · Post by **Tweed** » April 27th, 2024, 17:21

Gloomwood has a gay checkpoint save system and ugly aesthetic, consider it's place among HQ games disputed.

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » April 27th, 2024, 17:26

Tweed wrote: ↑ April 27th, 2024, 17:21
Gloomwood has a gay checkpoint save system and ugly aesthetic, consider it's place among HQ games disputed.

saar please make an official dispute thread saar

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » April 27th, 2024, 17:45

Stygian: Reign of the Old Ones was incorrectly marked as recommended, I fixed it, Not Recommended as the intention.

J1M · Post by **J1M** » April 27th, 2024, 17:50

Maybe there should be a second curated list of "HQ picks" where we select the best game from year/quarter (think of the high quality threads!). When there are dozens of recommendations a list is less useful for discovery.

Post by **rusty_shackleford** » April 27th, 2024, 17:54

I've removed most of the "This is HQ" reviews. I originally added them just because we needed 10 to appear on Steam. From now on I'll only be recommending games we have full reviews for, and marking shit games as Not Recommended(LQ).

1998 · Post by **1998** » May 1st, 2024, 17:45

rusty_shackleford wrote: ↑ April 27th, 2024, 17:45
Stygian: Reign of the Old Ones was incorrectly marked as recommended, I fixed it, Not Recommended as the intention.

Honestly I would give this an Informational rating. Yes, its unfinished. But knowing that, for pennies on a deep sale, the first ~15 hours are not bad. There are certainly many worse RPGs on Steam.