Idol to Satan erected in Iowa capitol, destroyed days later

[Nammu Archag]

"This shows the hypocrisy of the right on freedom of religion." These people have no clue that they aren't dealing with liberals anymore.

Who are we to judge what children liberals sacrifice in their own temples?



Liberalism, libertarianism, whatever you want to call it. This has always been Luciferianism. Do what thou wilt. This is what people have to understand.

Brazilians have gone bananas.

wtf is going on in brazil

[Xenich]

Is there some list of definitions people are using here to term various political ideologies? It seems all over the place, subjective, and without logical form.

Can someone point me to a list of those ideologies and the proper definitions of them that is used and understood here? They vary between the origins defining them and are constantly confused between common discussions.

Maybe we should form a list in a pinned thread that has the definitions all defined to everyone's agreement, that way there is no confusion?

[WhiteShark]

Maybe we should form a list in a pinned thread that has the definitions all defined to everyone's agreement, that way there is no confusion?

It's a nice idea but it will never work because our local communists will argue to the bitter end that it's not a form of liberalism.

[Xenich]

Maybe we should form a list in a pinned thread that has the definitions all defined to everyone's agreement, that way there is no confusion?

It's a nice idea but it will never work because our local communists will argue to the bitter end that it's not a form of liberalism.

Could always set the definitions, then poll them and do a majority decision on it (ie denote name with the vote, so the communists out themselves). Then those will be the referred to definitions for discussion here and the communists can go fuck themselves? Kind of what we should have been doing in protecting language for years when they began to change the meanings over time.

Edit:

Another solution is to define an ideology without a label, then just label it whatever we want (ie Ideology 123). Then, communists can't confuse it, because they would be arguing with the definition itself, not the label. Alinsky tactics need a label or word to confuse, in meaning. They don't want any specific understanding to be defined because it explains what they are exactly. Remove that conditional argument from them, and they get shown for what they are.

[Vergil]

"This shows the hypocrisy of the right on freedom of religion." These people have no clue that they aren't dealing with liberals anymore.

Who are we to judge what children liberals sacrifice in their own temples?



Liberalism, libertarianism, whatever you want to call it. This has always been Luciferianism. Do what thou wilt. This is what people have to understand.

Brazilians have gone bananas.

Yea the overton window has definitely shifted, you couldn't be pro mainstream liberal economics before.

[Nammu Archag]

Who are we to judge what children liberals sacrifice in their own temples?



Liberalism, libertarianism, whatever you want to call it. This has always been Luciferianism. Do what thou wilt. This is what people have to understand.

Brazilians have gone bananas.

Yea the overton window has definitely shifted, you couldn't be pro mainstream liberal economics before.

Latams are ideologically behind the rest of the world by about 40 years

[A Chinese opium den]

Brazilians have gone bananas.

Yea the overton window has definitely shifted, you couldn't be pro mainstream liberal economics before.

Latams are ideologically behind the rest of the world by about 40 years

God only knows how far behind in the other aspects of development.