Kingdom Come 2 - Your Same-Sex Adventure Awaits!

[Tag365]

Some people are claiming that the code of conduct they just added was a generic thing all popular games have in their Steam forums, is that actually true, or is that actually a sign of the game being woke?

[rusty_shackleford]

Some people are claiming that the code of conduct they just added was a generic thing all popular games have in their Steam forums, is that actually true, or is that actually a sign of the game being woke?

Those "some people" are called paid shills

[Shillitron]

#BASED Vavra statement confirming the presence of black and gay characters

"Our goal was, and still is, to show life in medieval Bohemia as it easily could of happened."



"AT THE SAME TIME.."

There was no "At the same time" qualifier for KCD 1. Dropped.

[Shillitron]

"AT THE SAME TIME....."

[1998]

Some people are claiming that the code of conduct they just added was a generic thing all popular games have in their Steam forums, is that actually true, or is that actually a sign of the game being woke?

Please, just don't. Read Cuckvras response, that gayme will be the wokest game ever.

[Gunnar]

These devs are an annoying breed of **** who ascribe to the horseshoe theory, in which they refuse to take a stand on any issue, while arrogantly looking at everyone who does with disdain and dishonesty lumping them all together so they can pretend they are morally superior. That is why they put culture war in quotes, as if they are above it and it’s why they are flipping on the issues, since they have no moral convictions whatever and never did. It’s a very weak and cowardly (and european) intellectual position and it always disgusts me when I hear it.

[loregamer]

Even if by some miracle all the rumors aren't true and they don't have this slop in the game, Warhorse deserves to sink for how they've responded

[Shillitron]

Some people are claiming that the code of conduct they just added was a generic thing all popular games have in their Steam forums, is that actually true, or is that actually a sign of the game being woke?

Please, just don't. Read Cuckvras response, that gayme will be the wokest game ever.

Musa teleporting around the world bro. It's an RPG bro.

[rusty_shackleford]

These devs are an annoying breed of **** who ascribe to the horseshoe theory, in which they refuse to take a stand on any issue, while arrogantly looking at everyone who does with disdain and dishonesty lumping them all together so they can pretend they are morally superior. That is why they put culture war in quotes, as if they are above it and it’s why they are flipping on the issues, since they have no moral convictions whatever and never did. It’s a very weak and cowardly (and european) intellectual position and it always disgusts me when I hear it.

it's not horseshoe, they're openly leftist while proclaiming they're not in an attempt to recoup some lost sales

[Gunnar]

These devs are an annoying breed of **** who ascribe to the horseshoe theory, in which they refuse to take a stand on any issue, while arrogantly looking at everyone who does with disdain and dishonesty lumping them all together so they can pretend they are morally superior. That is why they put culture war in quotes, as if they are above it and it’s why they are flipping on the issues, since they have no moral convictions whatever and never did. It’s a very weak and cowardly (and european) intellectual position and it always disgusts me when I hear it.

it's not horseshoe, they're openly leftist while proclaiming they're not in an attempt to recoup some lost sales

One of the warhorse devs uses those words on some codex thread i was reading and vaveas statement reads that way, this is what they believe of themselves, though they are actually leftists i agree with you

[rusty_shackleford]

These devs are an annoying breed of **** who ascribe to the horseshoe theory, in which they refuse to take a stand on any issue, while arrogantly looking at everyone who does with disdain and dishonesty lumping them all together so they can pretend they are morally superior. That is why they put culture war in quotes, as if they are above it and it’s why they are flipping on the issues, since they have no moral convictions whatever and never did. It’s a very weak and cowardly (and european) intellectual position and it always disgusts me when I hear it.

it's not horseshoe, they're openly leftist while proclaiming they're not in an attempt to recoup some lost sales

One of the warhorse devs uses those words on some codex thread i was reading and vaveas statement reads that way, this is what they believe of themselves, though they are actually leftists i agree with you

That warhorse dev is a homosexual who now works for larian.

[Shillitron]

These devs are an annoying breed of **** who ascribe to the horseshoe theory, in which they refuse to take a stand on any issue, while arrogantly looking at everyone who does with disdain and dishonesty lumping them all together so they can pretend they are morally superior. That is why they put culture war in quotes, as if they are above it and it’s why they are flipping on the issues, since they have no moral convictions whatever and never did. It’s a very weak and cowardly (and european) intellectual position and it always disgusts me when I hear it.

it's not horseshoe, they're openly leftist while proclaiming they're not in an attempt to recoup some lost sales

Name an industry where corporations know exactly what their customers want and what will make them fucktons of money.. and actively do the opposite to spite their own customers. To the point of cratering their stock and going bankrupt.

It's Clown World.

[Tweed]

Guess the only positive from that disaster is that, should there be any mods, we will see an influx of newfags.

Explain to me how this is positive.

[logincrash]

Guess the only positive from that disaster is that, should there be any mods, we will see an influx of newfags.

Explain to me how this is positive.

More people to appreciate your art.

[Tweed]

More people to appreciate your art.

Explain to me how this is positive.

[1998]

Guess the only positive from that disaster is that, should there be any mods, we will see an influx of newfags.

Explain to me how this is positive.

Well, every once in a while there is actually a newfag contributing. I wouldn't want to crawl back to DU

[logincrash]

More people to appreciate your art.

Explain to me how this is positive.

More people to be scared away by the swastika on your avatar.

[Tweed]

More people to appreciate your art.

Explain to me how this is positive.

More people to be scared away by the swastika on your avatar.

yes.jpg

[rusty_shackleford]

for no reason at all, I felt like posting this


rpghq; the rpg forum that doesn't split on-topic discussions and move them to a hidden subforum to hide jewish lies

[Roguey]

Gildersleeve : Say, are you trying to pull a fast one?
Bugs Bunny : Well, confidentially, chubby... I just did.

[Rand]

They banned like 10 accounts I made and deleted all messages asking about the controversies as soon as they could

****troversy

[TKVNC]

"they refuse to take a stand on any issue... they have no moral convictions whatever and never did"

Hmm... Could it be that Vara is a... Jew?

[logincrash]

They banned like 10 accounts I made and deleted all messages asking about the controversies as soon as they could

****troversy

10 a****ts
as **** as they ****d

[NezahualDoomer]

The grifters are still playing defense for this, one ****** actually said that faggotry isn't wokenes and then the other agreed, after that they probably got themselves into a room pinches PUTOS.

[Rand]

It's a sort of medium crossbow. Clearly the type that requires strength and a long lever (goat's foot) to **** it.
Still should have a stirrup, though. Only the lightest hand-drawn ones didn't. And that one would take a VERY strong man to hand-draw those arms.
Few women could do it even with the stirrup and lever, though. It'll be a 200 pound plus draw or so and even with mechanical advantage and the legs, it'll be hard.
Windlass heavy crossbows with steel arms could have a 1000 pound draw.

It's remarkable that people actually think Crossbows are an 'easier' weapon than a bow; the reason they became more popular than bows was never ease of use - it was raw power

I thought ease of use was a benefit as in you could train a group of men to use crossbows in a matter of weeks versus the years it took to become proficient with the bow, but I guess I was wrong. Both require upper body strength to use properly.

No, you're right.
You can train a qualified man to use a crossbow quickly.
It's easier to both load and aim a crossbow by an order of magnitude if not more.
Loading drills for green troops for a few weeks with target drills will make them reasonably competent.
You cannot do that for war bows. They will be useless troops.

The downsides for crossbows are expense and a much slower rate of fire (for armor piercing strength crossbows).

[maidenhaver]

This culture war is so rather bizarre. Maybe I should find one post I don't like and call him a name for clout. Maybe I should give a public defense in corpospeak. Why aren't my fans lapping up my slop?

[NezahualDoomer]

LMAO

Guys, you can't make this **** up seriously.

Guess who is playing defense for faggotry and saying it's not WOKE?

WHAT TIME IS IT GUYS???

[Brother Chad]

Is this the biggest fall from chud grace of modern gaming?

[Shillitron]

This culture war is so rather bizarre. Maybe I should find one post I don't like and call him a name for clout. Maybe I should give a public defense in corpospeak. Why aren't my fans lapping up my slop?

"Guys trust me. You'll understand our vision once the 2 hour refund window elapses."

Wasn't this exactly what the Assassin Creed Shadow producer said 4 months back?

[TKVNC]

It's a sort of medium crossbow. Clearly the type that requires strength and a long lever (goat's foot) to **** it.
Still should have a stirrup, though. Only the lightest hand-drawn ones didn't. And that one would take a VERY strong man to hand-draw those arms.
Few women could do it even with the stirrup and lever, though. It'll be a 200 pound plus draw or so and even with mechanical advantage and the legs, it'll be hard.
Windlass heavy crossbows with steel arms could have a 1000 pound draw.

It's remarkable that people actually think Crossbows are an 'easier' weapon than a bow; the reason they became more popular than bows was never ease of use - it was raw power

I thought ease of use was a benefit as in you could train a group of men to use crossbows in a matter of weeks versus the years it took to become proficient with the bow, but I guess I was wrong. Both require upper body strength to use properly.

No, you're right.
You can train a qualified man to use a crossbow quickly.
It's easier to both load and aim a crossbow by an order of magnitude if not more.
Loading drills for green troops for a few weeks with target drills will make them reasonably competent.
You cannot do that for war bows. They will be useless troops.

The downsides for crossbows are expense and a much slower rate of fire (for armor piercing strength crossbows).

That's not actually entirely true. Bows were generally easier to employ quickly, and to train for. From a modern perspective, we can see that crossbows might seem more obvious to us, who are familiar with guns. But crossbows are different. While technically easier to operate, they are no easier to aim than a bow, and with the slower rate of fire, it's far more relevant that you can aim accurately.

They were very expensive to make, very highly sought after, and the men who could use them well were paid handsomely. They also required more men to field. Usually 2 to 3 per crossbow.

Conversely, Bows were cheaper to make, easier to field, and actually required less effort to learn - most war bows were not the extreme examples of 130lb, most would have been 80-100, which required significantly less muscle, as the requirement tends to be logarithmic. For what it's worth; archers were not the 'cheap, and generic' troop, that honour goes to spearmen. Archers were still pretty well paid, and very well trained. Ranged weapons were never actually the low-quality troops.

For what it's worth, by even the 14th Century fighting as a professionals job, 'reasonable' competency was not good enough; there's a lot of written sources that say men would train (with various weapons) till their hands were calloused, and that a poorly trained force was effectively worthless on the battlefield.

Guess who is playing defense for faggotry and saying it's not WOKE?

With **** - you lose.