RPGHQ Responds to Misrepresentation in Academic Research

[rusty_shackleford]

I could almost certainly narrow it down to a handful of accounts just by limiting it by date and looking for IPs from germany.
I think we actually required 3 posts to be able to see members only stuff at the time, so, hmm

[rusty_shackleford]

I could almost certainly narrow it down to a handful of accounts just by limiting it by date and looking for IPs from germany.
I think we actually required 3 posts to be able to see members only stuff at the time, so, hmm

Just realized I don't care anywhere near enough to do this

[Shillitron]

Ok I'm fed up.

It's time to take matters in my own hands since Rusty stopped caring. As of writing this I've phoned 15 Sausage and Kabob huts.

I hope Eva-Maria likes honey garlic kabasa BITCH - 20 deliveries incoming.

[Jordy]

Ok I'm fed up.

It's time to take matters in my own hands since Rusty stopped caring. As of writing this I've phoned 15 Sausage and Kabob huts.

I hope Eva-Maria likes honey garlic kabasa BITCH - 20 deliveries incoming.

I demand the return of the sausages!

[1998]

The real crime here is that summarizing some posts in random forums can get you a master degree. I would be absolutely ashamed having any degrees in social "sciences".

[Tweed]

[NotAI]

"The real crime here is that summarizing some posts in random forums can get you a master degree."

Yep, that's the issue with super-soft "science". It's also the reason why so many more ppl tends to go into those pseudo-fields: most ppl can get a higher degree in that manner or not at all.

The issue is that sociology and related "work" used to be done by extremely erudite persons, such as Weber, Mead, Sumner, Spencer, Merton, Taine, Durheim, Spengler, Freud.

So regardless of whether all their stuff was correct or not, at least it had a "chance" to be correct. At least it stimulated others to think better...

In that sense even Kissinger is at least "readable". Even nonsense like from Fukuyama is at least "readable".

Most ppl today simply are not erudite enough (read: insufficiently literate) to write anything of value in any nonscientific modes, so in fields that are basically nonexperimental, unstructured observation plus arbitrary, subjective interpretation, except maybe by sheer accident.